Effectiveness of application from of sport disputes resolution in modern conditions

The article presents the results of the analysis of theoretical and organizational aspects of sports disputes resolution, which allowed to prepare offers on the use of effective forms of their resolving in the view of the conflict-free society concept. Under the conditions of the workload of the judiciary and the lack of performance guarantees of made solutions (according to the literature, the failure of judicial decisions is 48%) an effective (as shown by foreign experience) is the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (mediation, arbitration in national and international sports arbitration courts). The research purpose is identification and analysis of the problematic aspects of the application of effective forms of sports disputes resolution. The study revealed the following: 1. The forms of sports dispute resolution depend on the public sector management model and include their consideration: in the jurisdictional bodies established in national and international sports federations; in the public or the arbitration court. The legislation provides conflict resolution through alternative mechanisms - negotiations, mediators participate (mediation), conciliation. When choosing the form you should take into account participants status and dispute category. 2. In spite of the various forms of sports disputes resolution, taking into account Russian and foreign practice, benefits have nongovernmental - conciliation, mediation, arbitration sports, jurisdictional bodies of sports organizations, whose competence is determined by the regulations.