On the issue of introducing the concept of architectural heritage into the conceptual apparatus of political science

The article delves into the potential integration of architectural heritage as a distinct concept within the wider field of political science. The authors aim to demonstrate the merits of distinguishing architectural heritage from the broader category of cultural heritage. This distinction stems from the unique attributes inherent in architectural heritage. Firstly, architectural heritage is characterized by its inherent immobility. Consequently, decisions regarding their preservation or alteration carry significant political and economic weight, influencing a city's landscape and identity. Secondly, the preservation of architectural heritage often entails significant financial investment. Consequently, governments and policymakers must carefully weigh the costs and benefits of preservation efforts, considering factors like tourism revenue, cultural identity, and urban development. Moreover, unlike other forms of cultural heritage, architectural heritage is directly intertwined with the daily lives of citizens. The presence of historical landmarks can foster local pride, attract tourism, and shape a city's image. This inherent link to everyday life necessitates a political science lens to understand the power dynamics, decision-making processes, and competing interests surrounding architectural heritage. Furthermore, the article acknowledges a recent trend - the increasing emphasis on architectural heritage preservation within the broader context of urban renewal and environmental improvement. The authors stress the importance of not overlooking the inherent cultural and historical value of architectural heritage. Therefore, the article advocates for a holistic approach that considers both the practical implications and the intrinsic worth of preserving these tangible links to the past.