The quality of appeal decisions in labor disputes

Purpose: To consider the quality of legal reasoning in the judicial acts of the second instance on labor disputes, in particular, and in civil cases, in general, and to develop, if necessary, proposals for its improvement. Methodology: We used both general scientific (analysis and synthesis, induction, logical method) and private scientific research methods (comparative legal and statistical). Results: The existence of a problem with the quality of judicial acts adopted by the second instance on labour disputes, in particular, and civil cases, in general, and the ways to solve it. Novelty/originality/value: We proposed a new approach to determining the qualitative characteristics of a judicial act is suggested, as the presence of a ratio decidendi in it, which indicates the novelty and originality of the article. A detailed analysis of the identified systemic problem with the availability of legal reasoning in the judicial acts of the second instance and proposals for its solution indicate the value of the study.