Staffing as a factor of effective innovation management in construction

A comparative analysis of the structure of university training for the construction industry with its real needs is carried out. It is established that the system of university and postgraduate training of personnel for construction is practically not structured, which does not correspond to the actual needs of the construction industry in innovative personnel. On the example of St. Petersburg: the author's structure is given, which gives a general idea of the needs of the city's construction industry in innovative personnel; an example of calculation for one of the formed product groups is given. The conclusion is made about the need, on the one hand, to differentiate the direction of training "construction", and on the other, to consolidate the actually existing product groups to the level of groups (subgroups) of construction specialties, without which the construction industry will be doomed to degradation. The conclusion is supported by a similar assessment of the effectiveness of the current system of university training for construction, made by the Ministry of Construction of the Russian Federation, in which the Bologna system is named as the root cause of the lack of influx of qualified personnel. The analysis was carried out and the geopolitical interests of the countries participating in the Bologna Process of 1999, antagonistic to Russia, were revealed, namely: the circle of countries that signed the Bologna Declaration was limited to the euro-zone, the European Union and the NATO bloc, to which Russia does not belong. In this regard, it is proposed to immediately reform the current system of university and postgraduate training, which is based on the principles of the "Bologna process".