Klein model of macroeconomic model: BRICS
Автор: Gabrielyan O.R.
Журнал: Экономика и социум @ekonomika-socium
Статья в выпуске: 4-1 (13), 2014 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140124518
IDR: 140124518
Текст статьи Klein model of macroeconomic model: BRICS
The purpose of this work is to analyze the Klein’s Investment function. The initial equation of the Klein’s Investment function looks like this:
Ii=a0+a1Yt+a2rt+Ƹi
In this research work I have constructed econometric models of this function for the analysis of the Gross capital formation formerly gross domestic investments and the influence of GDP and Interest rate on its value.
Yi=a0+a1X1t+a2x2t+Ƹi; E(w)=0; Ϭ=const
(Yi) is the Gross Capital Formation or just Gross domestic investment.
(X1t) - is Gross Domestic Product that is defined by OECD as an aggregate measure of production.
(X2t) – is interest rate is the rate at which interest is paid by a borrower from a creditor.
A0, a1 and a2 are the coefficients of our linear equation
Ƹi is an unobserved random variable, or disturbance term.
In this work I estimated 5 countries that are BRICS
Tests:
Correlation matrix ;
R2 – helps to calculate rate of explanatory ability between independent and dependent variables.
F – test is any statistical test in which the test statistic has an F -distribution under the null hypothesis.
T – test is any statistical hypothesis test in which the test statistic follows a Student’s t distribution if the null hypothesis is supported.
Goldfield-Quandt test is a test for heteroscedasticity.
F test |
|||||
Brazil |
Russia |
India |
China |
South Africa |
|
F |
28,161 |
8646,2 |
71,141 |
109,527 |
11,467 |
Ftest |
3,8055 |
3,682 |
3,315 |
3,3403 |
3,315 |
F>Ftest |
True |
True |
True |
True |
True |
T-test
Brazil and Russia have the same =СТЬЮДРАСПОБР(0,05;18) = 2,1009
India and South Africa have the same =СТЬЮДРАСПОБР(0,05;33) = 2,034
China has =СТЬЮДРАСПОБР(0,05;31) = 2,039
Brazil:
StatY= -0,63655< t-crit – coefficient is not significant
StatX1= 6,29969> t-crit coefficient is significant
StatX2= 0,85583< t-crit coefficient is not significant
Russia:
StatY= -1,55070> t-crit coefficient is not significant
StatX1= 10,1174> t-crit coefficient is significant
StatX2= -1,07447< t-crit coefficient is not significant
India:
StatY= -1,60219< t-crit – coefficient is not significant
StatX1= 9,41773> t-crit coefficient is significant
StatX2= 0,3488< t-crit coefficient is not significant
China:
StatY= -8,7702> t-crit coefficient is not significant
StatX1= 14,7326> t-crit coefficient is significant
StatX2= -0,8807> t-crit coefficient is not significant
South Africa:
StatY= -1,86310> t-crit coefficient is not significant
StatX1= 4,61979> t-crit coefficient is significant
StatX2= 0,8576> t-crit coefficient is not significant
In all countries we have not got significant coefficients it means that it is possible that after checking adequacy of this model we will have to reestimate them without this variables or change the time limits.
GQ-test
GQ |
|||||
Brazil |
Russia |
India |
China |
South Africa |
|
GQ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
1/GQ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
For all countries the residuals are heteroscedastic
DW-test
0 dl du 2 4-du 4-dl 4
0 |
1,114 |
1,358 |
2,642 |
2,886 |
4 |
|
Country |
Stat |
Brazil |
1,31766 |
Russia |
0,79695 |
India |
1,19083 |
China |
0,89328 |
South Africa |
1,73473 |
-
• The DWstat for Brazil, South Africa and India lies between DU and
4-DU – it means that the residuals aren’t autocorrelated and 3rd Gauss-Markov condition is not broken
-
• DWstat for Russia, China lies between 0 and DL, which means that
residuals are positively autocorrelated
Adequacy:
For South Africa model is not adequate, as Yreal is not lay between two boundaries. It means that we cant use this model to predict changes in Investment in Netherlands. In other cases Y real lay in the interval between two boundaries. For other countries this model is adequate and can be used for predictions.
Conclusion:
For South Africa model is not adequate, as Yreal is not lay between two boundaries. It means that we cant use this model to predict changes in Investment in Netherlands. In other cases Y real lay in the interval between two boundaries. For other countries this model is adequate and can be used for predictions.