Conventional and constitutional conflicts in the light of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation

Introduction: the article deals with the enforcement of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights under convention-constitutional conflicts. Materials and Methods: regulatory acts became the normative basis of the study. Russian specialists in constitutional law became the theoretical basis of the study. General dialectical method of scientific cognition, methods of logical deduction, induction, and cognitive methods provided the methodological basis of the study. Results: the detailed study of the essence of the conventional and constitutional conflicts showed the ambiguity of the causes of their occurrence. Contradictions arise as a result of a conflict of interpretation due to different views on legal values, the lack of a single definition of various legal terms. The article presented some options for solving problems that arise in the execution of the decision of the European Court of Justice. Discussion and Сonclusions: the article substantiates the conclusion that it is necessary for the state to create an effective mechanism of conciliation procedures for the execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.