Leading Russian economists on ideology in economic science

Автор: Volchik V.V., Maslyukova E.V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article considers the role of ideological component in the works of leading Russian economists. In this paper the mutual influence of ideology and economic theory is considered. Addressing ideology explicitly is important in order to be able to track how ideological processes in economic science itself influence our lives through ways of thinking and politics. The analysis of the use of the concept of “ideology” by leading Russian economists is conducted. With the help of quantitative content analysis of the formed base of scientific articles of 21 leading Russian economists, a categorical grid (dictionary) of content analysis, including 406 word-combinations, was formed. To identify key microthemes, factor analysis (principal component analysis) was used; as a result, nine thematic groups were identified based on the interpretation of the obtained factor loads of the principal components: relationship of ideology with the formation of world economic patterns in the context of the formation of a new configuration of the global economy; relationship of market mechanisms and economic development; economic reproduction, state planning and control; global dominance and hegemony of the United States; state regulation with an emphasis on issues of entrepreneurship and capital reproduction and public interests; liberal globalization in the context of international cooperation and social responsibility; administrative reform, regulation and executive power of the Russian Federation; development of information technologies and information economy in the context of meeting needs, decision-making and organization of production and regional and spatial development of Russia. The analysis of microthemes from texts of leading Russian economists, using in explicit form the concept of ideology, allows showing the influence of the ideological component on positive and normative aspects of research within the framework of Russian economic science.

Еще

Ideology, economic theory, economic ideology, methodology of economic science, factor analysis, leading russian economists

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147245870

IDR: 147245870   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.4.94.3

Список литературы Leading Russian economists on ideology in economic science

  • Arthur W.B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208
  • Backhouse R.E. (2010). The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology? Cambridge University Press.
  • Badiei S. (2024). Normative Economics in the History of Economic Thought: Marx, Mises, Friedman and Popper. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
  • Balatsky E.V. (2020). “Institutional trap”: Both a productive concept and a fine metaphor. Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(3), 24–41. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.3.024-041 (in Russian).
  • Colander D. (2013). On the ideological migration of the economics laureates. Scholarly Comments on Academic Economics, 1(3), 240–254.
  • Coleman W.O. (2002). Economics and Its Enemies. Palgrave Macmillan Books.
  • Demicheva T.N. (2008). Ideologiya i nauka (diskussii sovetskikh uchenykh serediny XX veka) [Ideology and Science (Discussions of Soviet Scientists in the Middle of the 20th Century]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.
  • Gieryn T.F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 781–795.
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2014). Conservatism and the new economy. Tetradi po konservatizmu, 1, 61–69 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2020). Noonomy as the forming linchpin for the new technological and world economic order. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii=Economic Revival of Russia, 2(64), 15–32 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2022). Global transformations from the perspective of technological and economic world order change. AlterEconomics, 19(1), 93–115 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2023) Technologies and sovereignty: Is the state in the grip of digital revolution? Problemy natsional'noi strategii=National Strategy Issues, 6(81), 60–75 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu., Aivazov A.E., Belikov V.A. (2019). Cyclic-wave theories of economic development and prospects of the world economy. Is the medium-term and long-term development of the world economy predictable? Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii, 219(5), 177–211 (in Russian).
  • Gulbina N.I., Artibyakina T.Yu. (2015). Ideology and economics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 1(29), 31–41 (in Russian).
  • Holcombe R.G., Hobbes T., Locke J., Rousseau J.J., Rawls J., Buchanan J.M. (2021). Contractarian ideology and the legitimacy of government. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(3), 379–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000521
  • Javdani M., Chang H.J. (2023). Who said or what said? Estimating ideological bias in views among economists. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 47(2), 309–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/CJE/BEAC071
  • Kirdina S.G. (2006). “The glory and the poverty” of political economy of socialism (institutional analysis hypothesis of the Russian society). Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii, 2, 19–39 (in Russian).
  • Kirdina-Chandler S.G. (2022). Economic theory, ideology, and economic interests. AlterEconomics,19(1), 71–92 (in Russian).
  • Leksin V.N. (2006). Administrative reform and public administration quality assessment. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 22, 113–132 (in Russian).
  • Leksin V.N. (2019). The roads that we do not choose (on the government “Strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025”). Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 3, 3–24 (in Russian).
  • Leksin V.N. (2023). Secret passages of the state ideologyю Svobodnaya mysl', 5(1701), 147–158 (in Russian).
  • Makarov V.L., Grebennikov V.G., Dementiev V.E., Ustyuzhanina E.V. (2019). Ideology and science (based on the discussion in CEMI RAS). Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 4, 55–69 (in Russian).
  • Minakir P.A. (2016). The national strategy of spatial development: Is it the conscientious delusion or deliberate simplification? Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 3, 7–15 (in Russian).
  • North D. (1997). Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance]. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi “Nachala”.
  • North D. (2010). Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmenenii [Understanding the Process of Economic Change]. Moscow: Izd-vo GU VShE.
  • North D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  • North D.C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.
  • Nureev R.M., Orekhovsky P.A. (2021). Debates around the basic production relationship in political economy of socialism: The cognitive deadlock in the 1970s. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii=Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 185–196 (in Russian).
  • Orlov A.I., Reut D.V. (2017). About the effect of the scale of an agro-industrial system on tasks and apparatus of controlling subsystems in its control system. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta=Polythematic Online Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, 129(5), 532–562 (in Russian).
  • Piketty T. (2020). Capital and Ideology. Harvard University Press.
  • Polterovich V.M. (2005). Towards a manual for reformers: Some conclusions from the theory of economic reform. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii, 1, 7–25 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2008). Interviewing oneself (on the book by Janos Kornai “By the Strength of Thought. Nonordinary Reсollections about One Intellectual Journey”). Voprosy ekonomiki, 5, 127–133 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2017). Designing the strategies for socio-economic development: Science vs. ideology. VTE, 1, 55–65 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2022). On the way to a general theory of socio-economic development: Towards the synthesis of two canons. Voprosy teoreticheskoi ekonomiki, 1, 48–57 (in Russian).
  • Romer P.M. (2015). Mathiness in the theory of economic growth. American Economic Review, 105(5), 89–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151066
  • Samuels W.J. (1992). Ideology in Economics. Essays on the Methodology and Discourse of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12371-1_12
  • Sedlachek T. (2017). Economics is similar to religion: It raises much more expectations than could fulfill (interview with Tomas Sedlacek). Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy, 12(4), 250–269 (in Russian).
  • Shleifer A., Treisman D. (2004). A normal country. Ekovest, 4(1), 44–78 (in Russian).
  • Sokolov M.M., Chechik E.A. (2022). Academic reputations of Russian economists and their scientometric estimates. Voprosy ekonomiki, 11, 117–135 (in Russian).
  • Sugden R. (1986). The Economics of Rights, Co-operation, and Welfare. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Volchik V.V. (2022). Increasing return and Russian innovation system. Upravlenie naukoi: teoriya i praktika=Science Management: Theory and Practice, 4(4), 88–116 (in Russian).
  • Volkonsky V.A. (2024). On ideologies and their bearers: Revisiting the issue. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 17(1), 41–59. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.1.91.2 (in Russian).
  • Weber I.M. (2021). How China Escaped Shock Therapy: The Market Reform Debate. Routledge.
  • Yun J.J. (2022). About Capital and Ideology by Thomas Piketty. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(2), 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC8020076
Еще
Статья научная