Minor Act: Conflict of Theory and Practice

The text discusses the problem of applying the institute of insignificance in legal practice. The author points out the contradictions and difficulties associated with recognizing acts as insignificant, especially in the context of justice and rehabilitation of individuals. The text discusses the problem of applying the institute of insignificance in legal practice. The author notes the contradictions and difficulties associated with recognizing acts as insignificant, and suggests eliminating the institution of insignificance as a basis for rehabilitation. The main problem is that government agencies are often unable or unwilling to recognize acts as insignificant. This may be due to a desire to increase the disclosure rating or to show protection of citizens’ rights. The author also points to the problem of the unlawful conviction of persons whose actions subsequently do not contain elements of a crime. It is proposed to exclude the institution of insignificance as a basis for rehabilitation, so that law enforcement officers can more fairly approach the issue of applying insignificance.