Manifestations of digital socialization among young people: findings of a pilot survey of high school students

Manifestations of digital socialization among young people: findings of a pilot survey of high school students

Автор: Golovchin Maksim A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 5 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In the modern world, the processes of socialization (personality formation) are gradually moving from the real world to the online space. However, due to the increasing risks of digitalization, the impact of digital socialization on the younger generation becomes an object of controversy among scientists and the public. The paper proposes our own two-stage typology of Internet users, based on the signs of manifestation of online temperament as a behavioral model formed in the course of digital socialization. According to the classification, Internet users have features of the following types: “opportunist / idealist” (using the Internet for deception), “enthusiast / skeptic” (trust / distrust of the content), “aggressor / tolerant” (manifestation of online aggression), “addictive / autonomous” (presence of Internet addiction). Combinations of features of particular types make up the general types of users (adaptive, substitutional, passive), which reflect the results of digital socialization and network acculturation. We propose an algorithm for identifying the types of Internet users in the course of a sociological study. Having tested the proposed solution within the framework of an intelligence study (in the case of a pilot group of schoolchildren from the city of Vologda) we formulate working hypotheses about the diverse impact of digital socialization on modern schoolchildren; dynamics, instability and flexibility of online behavior models of the younger generation; close connection of the socializing influence of the Internet with the development of interpersonal communication. The hypotheses will be taken into account in the course of elaboration of the research topic. The article puts forward a model for organizing digital socialization based on the harmonization of interests of the widest possible range of agents. The findings of the research can be used in the formation of strategic plans for the development of the digital industry and educational policy. Scientific novelty of the research consists in the development of a new methodological solution for using the socializing influence of the Internet environment in the process of generalization.

Еще

Digital socialization, expected socialization, non-expected socialization, network acculturation, typology of users, sociological survey

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147239119

IDR: 147239119   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.13

Список литературы Manifestations of digital socialization among young people: findings of a pilot survey of high school students

  • Avdulova T.P. (2011). Teenagers’ socialization in the information space. Mir psikhologii, 3(67), 196–205 (in Russian).
  • Bochaver A.A., Dokuka S.V. Novikova M.A. et al. (2019). Blagopoluchie detei v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Children’s Well-Being in the Digital Age]. Moscow: NIU VShE.
  • Brandtzaeg Р.В. (2010). Towards a unified Media User Typology (MUT): A meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media user typologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 940–956 (in Russian).
  • Brodovskaya E.V., Dombrovskaya A.Yu. (2014). Profiles of Internet users and the national mentality in Russia and Sweden: Results of a comparative cluster analysis. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya=Fundamental Research, 11-3, 661–664 (in Russian).
  • Danby S.J., Fleer M., Davidson C. Hatzigianni M. (2018). Digital Childhoods: Technologies and Children’s Everyday Lives. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6484-5
  • Dudina O.V. (2021). Digital socialization structure in modern education. Vestnik ChGPU im. I.Ya. Yakovleva=I. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 3(112), 161–166 (in Russian).
  • Ershova R.V. (2019). Digital socialization of the individual in the era of global change. In: Prikladnaya psikhologiya na sluzhbe razvivayushcheisya lichnosti [Applied Psychology in the Service of Developing Personality]. Kolomna: Gosudarstvennyi sotsial’no-gumanitarnyi universitet (in Russian).
  • Folieva T.A. (2012). Expected/unexpected socialization: A few critical notes. Vestnik AGTU=Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University, 2, 113–117 (in Russian).
  • Golovchin M.A. (2019). Influence of Internet activity on life in the epoch of digitalization of the society and economy, by the data of regional research. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava=Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 13(3), 1356–1369. DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.3.1356-1369 (in Russian).
  • Golovchin M.A. (2022). Net culture of school children in the view of free and controlled formation: Experimental results. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki, 1(53), 149–163 (in Russian).
  • Golubeva N.A. (2020). Digital identity features of teenagers and youth in modern technological society. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie”=RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Psychology. Pedagogics. Education” Series, 1, 130–150 (in Russian).
  • Grevtseva G.Ya. (2022). Digital socialization of a person in educational environment. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki=Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences, 1, 40–49 (in Russian).
  • Gunina E.V., Dudina O.V. (2020). On the issue of studying the digital environment as a factor for individual socialization. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal=Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 6(143), 89–97 (in Russian).
  • Ignatova N.Yu. (2017). Digital natives: View from the outside. Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie, 1(65), 58–65. DOI 10.17223/16095944/65/8 (in Russian).
  • Zhavoronko E.S., Niyazova A.A. (2022). Formation of the student teachers’ functions in the digital educational environment. Kontsept=Koncept, 4, 79–94. DOI: 10.24412/2304-120X-2022-11025 (in Russian).
  • Khlebodarova O.B. (2010). Personality as a result of socialization. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 6, 266–271 (in Russian).
  • Kolpinets E.V., Kozharinova M.V. (2022). Female role models in the Russian segment of Instagram. Teoriya mody: odezhda. telo. kul’tura, 63, 268–286 (in Russian).
  • Kondratyeva O.N. (2020). A typology of social network users in the metaphorical mirror of the Russian mass-media. Filologicheskii klass=Philological Class, 25(1), 62–72. DOI: 10.26 170/FK20-01-06 (in Russian).
  • Kosik Yu.A. (2015). Online acculturation of personality in modern integration conditions. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Pedagogicheskie nauki”=Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part E. Pedagogical Sciences, 15, 104–107 (in Russian).
  • Kozhevnikov A.M., Maslikov V.A. (2020). The impact of internet communications on value orientations: A review. Sotsiologiya=Sociology, 1, 149–158 (in Russian).
  • Lazutkina E.V. (2017). Forms of manipulation of information in Runet’s social media. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 2(24), 221–225 (in Russian).
  • Livingstone S., Helsper E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children. young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
  • Luchinkina A.I., Luchinkina I.S. (2017). Methodological problems of the study of the communicative behavior of users in the Internet space. Gumanitarnye nauki=The Humanities, 4(40), 42–46 (in Russian).
  • Lukov V.A. (2002). Thesaurus concept of socialization. In: Diskurs: sotsiologicheskaya studiya. Vyp. 2 [Discourse: Sociological Studio. Issue 2]. Moscow: Sotsium (in Russian).
  • Maslennikov R.M. (2009). Khaos i poryadok v Internete. Osnovy setevoi samoorganizatsii. Ontologicheskoe issledovanie [Chaos and Order on the Internet. Fundamentals of Network Self-Organization. Ontological Research]. Moscow: Litres.
  • Morozova A. (2018). Typology of social network users. In: Mul’timediinaya zhurnalistika [Multimedia Journalism]. Minsk: Izdatel’skii tsentr BGU (in Russian).
  • Morozova E.V., Plotichkina N.V., Popova K.I. (2019). The state as an agent of digital socialization. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya=Bulletin of Perm University. Political Sciences, 13(2), 5–16 (in Russian).
  • Muench R. (1981). Socialization and personality development from the point of view of action theory, the legacy of Emile Durkheim. Sociological Inquiry, 51(3-4), 311–354.
  • Ortega E., Menendez M.R., Gonzalez M.V.R. (2007). Diffusion and usage patterns of Internet services in the European Union. Information Research, 12(2), 302.
  • Pashkovsky E.A. (2019). Internet as a communication problem. Diskurs=Discource, 5(1), 92–97. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-1-92-97 (in Russian).
  • Pescaru M. (2018). The importance of the socialization process for the integration of the child in the society. Revista Universitara de Sociologie, 0(2), 18–26.
  • Pleshakov V.A. (2009). Cybersocialization as innovative socially-pedagogical phenomenon. Prepodavatel ХХI vek, 3-1, 32–39.
  • Pleshakov V.A. (2012). Kibersotsializatsiya cheloveka: ot Homo Sapiens’a do Homo Cyberus’a [Human Cybersocialization: From Homo Sapiens to Homo Cyberus]. Moscow: Prometei.
  • Popova D.A. (2019). Digital personality as a central element of interpersonal Internet discourse. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Yazyk. Literatura. Kul’tura=Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture, 2, 87–91 (in Russian).
  • Prensky M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants (part 1). On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. DOI:10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Prokhorova V.A. (2019). Social networks as an agent of student socialization. In: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i demograficheskie aspekty realizatsii natsional’nykh proektov v regione. T. II [Socio-Economic and Demographic Aspects of the Implementation of National Projects in the Region. Volume 2]. Yekaterinburg: Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN (in Russian).
  • Radionova O.R., Alieva E.F., Avalueva N.B. et al. (2021). Digital socialization. Children and adolescents in the modern information space. Obrazovatel’naya politika=The Educational Policy, 3(87), 38–51. DOI: 10.22394/2078-838X-2021-3-38-51 (in Russian).
  • Romm T.A.. Romm M.V. (2021). Teaching personal development in the digital age. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya “Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya”=Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 4(40), 360–366 (in Russian).
  • Schiopu U., Verza E. (1995). The Age Psychology. The Life Cycles. Bucharest: Didactica si Pedagogica.
  • Shamionov R. (2013). Socialization of personality: Systematic-diachronic approach. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya=Psychological Studies, 6(27), 1–9. DOI: 10.54359/ps.v6i27.725 (in Russian).
  • Shcheglov I.A. (2016). Socialization: Agents, institution, factors. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya. psikhologiya. pedagogika=Society: Sociology. Psychology. Pedagogics, 4, 14–17 (in Russian).
  • Shih C.-F., Venkatesh A. (2004). Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 59–72.
  • Smith J., Hewitt B., Skrbis Z. (2015). Digital socialization: Young people’s changing value orientations towards Internet use between adolescence and early adulthood. Information Communication & Society, 18(9), 1022–1038. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1007074
  • Sobkin V.S., Fedotova A.V. (2019). Social media as a field of a modern teenager’s socialization. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya=Consulting Psychology and Psychotherapy, 27(3), 119–137. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2019270308 (in Russian).
  • Soldatova G.U. (2018). Digital socialization in the cultural-historical paradigm: A changing child in a changing world. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo=Social Psychology and Society, 9(3), 71–80. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2018090308 (in Russian).
  • Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Rasskazova E.I., Zotova E.Yu. (2013). Tsifrovaya kompetentnost’ podrostkov i roditelei. Rezul’taty vserossiiskogo issledovaniya [Digital Competence of Teenagers and Parents. Results of the All-Russian Study]. Moscow: Fond Razvitiya Internet.
  • Starodubtseva G.A. (2021). On information and digital socialization of preschool children. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal meditsiny i psikhologii=International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 4(8), 77–86 (in Russian).
  • Sutcliffe A.G., Binder J.F., Dunbar R.I.M. (2018). Activity in social media and intimacy in social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 227–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.050
  • Tapscott D., Barry B. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Tsymbalenko S., Sharikov A., Maiorova-Shcheglova S., Makeev P. (2012). Vliyanie interneta na rossiiskikh podrostkov i yunoshestvo v kontekste razvitiya rossiiskogo informatsionnogo prostranstva [The Impact of the Internet on Russian Teenagers and Young Adults in the Context of the Development of the Russian Information Space]. Moscow: Liga yunykh zhurnalistov.
  • Zherebin V.M., Alexeeva O.A., Vershinskaya O.N. (2017). Socio-psychological features of Internet users. Narodonaselenie=Population, 1(75), 116–124 (in Russian).
  • Zizek B. (2017). Digital socialization? An exploratory sequential analysis of anonymous adolescent internet-social interaction. Human Development, 60, 203–232. DOI: 10.1159/000479082
  • Zubok Yu.A., Lyubutov A.S. (2021). Semantic space of reality: Structural taxonomy of the foundations of self-regulation on interactions in the youth environment. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty. tendentsii. prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts. Trends. Forecast, 14(3), 167–181. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.10 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp