Medicamentous therapy of stable coronary artery disease sensu the guidelines on myocardial revascularization

Автор: Olga M. Posnenkova, Ekaterina N. Genkal, Yulia V. Popova, Anton R. Kiselev, Vladimir I. Gridnev

Журнал: Saratov Medical Journal @sarmj

Статья в выпуске: 2 Vol.1, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Objective: based on the Russian Federation multicenter registry data, to assess the comprehensiveness of medicamentous therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) from the perspective of 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC-2018) recommendations for myocardial revascularization and 2017 American Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC-2017) for the expediency of revascularization. Materials and methods. Anamnestic data of 1531 patients with stable CAD (average age: 61.7 ± 9.8 years; 76% men) were studied. The data source was the Russian Federation multicenter registry of patients with arterial hypertension, CAD, and chronic heart failure. We identified the prescription of optimal medical therapy (OMT) sensu ESC-2018, maximal anti-ischemic therapy (MAT) sensu AUC-2017, and compliance of drug therapy with ESC-2018 and AUC-2017 simultaneously. OMT included at least one anti-ischemic medication + antiplatelet agent + statin + short-acting nitrate + blocker of the renin-angiotensin system in the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or heart failure. MAT included at least two anti-ischemic pharmaceutical drugs. Compliance with these criteria was determined in the groups of patients who underwent, or did not undergo, myocardial revascularization, as well as among those, for whom invasive treatment was indicated as the first priority, as the second priority, or was not indicated at all, according to ESC-2018 and AUC-2017. Results. Among patients who received solely medicamentous therapy (n=924), OMT was prescribed in 18%, while in the revascularization group (n= 07), in 9% of cases (p <0.001). MAT was also prescribed more often in the conservative therapy group (34%) than in the revascularization group (24%): p = 0.001. OMT sensu ESC-2018 and AUC-2017 in the groups with, or without, intervention was prescribed in 3% vs. 7% of cases, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusion. According to the Russian Federation multicenter registry, medicamentous therapy of stable CAD complies with the provisions of European and American clinical guidelines for myocardial revascularization in a small proportion of patients, regardless of the chosen treatment tactics.

Еще

Stable coronary artery disease, myocardial revascularization, optimal medicamentous therapy, maximum anti-ischemic therapy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149135012

IDR: 149135012   |   DOI: 10.15275/sarmj.2020.0202

Список литературы Medicamentous therapy of stable coronary artery disease sensu the guidelines on myocardial revascularization

  • Kiselev AR, Korotin AS, Posnenkova OM, et al. Discrepancy between the European clinical guidelines and myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease in Russia. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2019; 31 (4): 269-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy140.
  • Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease / The Task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal 2013; 34 (38): 2949-3003. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.
  • Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 356 (15): 1503-16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070829.
  • Korotin AS, Popova YuV, Genkal EN, et al. Evaluation of myocardial revascularization in stable coronary heart disease patients and factors associated with invasive strategy choice. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2017; 16 (4): 18-24. https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2017-4-18-24 (In Russian).
  • Windecker SI, Falk V, Jun P, et al. 2014 ESC/EACT Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio Thoracic Surgery (EACT). European Heart Journal 2014; 35: 2541-619.
  • Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention 2019; 14 (14): 1435-534.
  • Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal 2019; 00: 1-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
  • Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2017; 24: 1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0917-9.
  • Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 391 (10115): 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9.
  • Gridnev VI, Kiselev AR, Posnenkova OM, et al. Objectives and design of Russian Registry of Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Heart Failure. Russian Open Medical Journal 2017; 6: e0201.
  • Posnenkova OM, Genkal EN, Popova YuV, et al. Applying IT for treatment strategy selection in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Cardio-IT 2019; 6 (1): e0201. (In Russian).
  • Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976; 54 (3): 522-3.
  • Borden WB, Redberg RF, Mushlin AI, et al. Patterns and intensity of medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2011; 305 (18): 1882-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.601.
  • Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356 (15): 1503-16.
  • Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, et al. Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve: FAME 2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (3): 250-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1803538.
Еще
Статья научная