Place and role of the institute of predition in civil proceedings

In the modern legal institution of prejudice in civil proceedings, it has undergone significant changes, namely in terms of the list of enforcement acts, which the legislator has endowed with prejudicial significance. In the scientific world, and in law enforcement practice, the question remains about how to correctly assess the information contained in a decision to terminate a criminal case on non-rehabilitating grounds, if such a decision is not made at the judicial stage of criminal proceedings. The issue of reforming the institution of prejudice in the civil procedure, in the inter-sectoral prejudice of judicial acts adopted in criminal proceedings, remains quite relevant, since the ongoing reform of procedural legislation, in the development of extrajudicial reconciliation procedures, enables the legislator, in conditions of discretion, to establish other procedures for terminating criminal cases on non-rehabilitating grounds, in the condition of establishing with the participation of the victim of a crime and describing in the decision to terminate the criminal case the circumstances that are important for the correct resolution of the civil case on the legal consequences of the crime committed.