Methodology for assessing regional specifics of interaction between foreign scientists and Russian scientific organizations and universities

Автор: Vasilyeva Irina N., Pokrovsky Dmitry S., Demidov Andrey V., Bitkina Inna V., Rebrova Tatyana P.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article examines the features of interactions between Russian scientific organizations and universities and foreign scientists. Despite the effort to collect and compile data on different types of international interactions between scientists, Russian academic literature does not pay sufficient attention to the activities of foreign scientists working in Russia. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to close the gaps in scientific knowledge connected to the research on academic mobility including identification of types and features of interactions between Russian scientific organizations and foreign scientists, to discover the connection between academic mobility and productivity of scientists, and to improve methods of arrangement for the data related to the status and performance of the academia. To accomplish this goal, we propose a methodology for monitoring the interaction of Russian organizations with foreign scientists. We carry out the monitoring taking into account the priorities formulated in the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - STD Strategy of Russia). The monitoring provided the data about the quantity of foreign scientists, who visited Russian scientific organizations and higher education institutions in 2018 and 2019, the statistics on the distribution of foreign scientists working in Russia by age groups, by scientific fields, by types of interaction, and by Russian regions. The following issues require thorough consideration: the choice of parameters for assessing the work of educational and scientific organizations and the need to take into account priorities of STD Strategy of Russia for monitoring and evaluating the interaction between Russian organizations and foreign scientists, the presence or absence of stable links between the mobility of scientists and their scientific productivity, the absence and fragmentation of data on foreign scientists working in Russia, and flaws in the methods for collecting and monitoring such data. The methodology has been tested using data from previous surveys. Following the test, we propose specific steps for improving data collection on broad participation of Russia in global science processes. The obtained results can be used by private and state organizations, including the management of higher education organizations, heads of scientific organizations (scientific departments), which will serve as the basis for accurate positioning of Russia on the world map of scientific and technological cooperation.

Еще

Circulation of scientific personnel, researchers, international academic mobility, monitoring, international scientific and technological cooperation

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147237316

IDR: 147237316

Список литературы Methodology for assessing regional specifics of interaction between foreign scientists and Russian scientific organizations and universities

  • Antoshchuk I.A., Ledeneva V.Yu. (2019). From Russia to the UK. On migration mechanism of young Russian computer scientists. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2, 108–118. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004015-9 (in Russian).
  • Azoulay P., Zivin J.S.G., Sampat B.N. (2011). The diffusion of scientific knowledge across time and space: Evidence from professional transitions for the superstars of medicine. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w16683
  • Bolli T., Schläpfer J. (2015). Job mobility, peer effects, and research productivity in economics. Scientometrics, 104, 629–650.
  • D’yachenko E.L., Nefedova A.I., Strel’tsova E.A. (2017). Recruitment of foreign scientists in Russian research organizations and universities: Opportunities and barriers. Universitetskoe upravlenie: Praktika i analiz=University Management: Practice and Analysis, 21(5), 132–143. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2017.05.069 (in Russian).
  • Dostie B., Léger P. (2009). Self-selection in migration and returns to unobservable skills. Journal of Population Economics, 22(4), 1005–1024. Available at: https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/1942/self-selection-in-migration-and-returns-to-unobservable-skills
  • Drugova E.A., Nuzhina N.I., Koryakovtseva P.V. (2016). International academic recruitment at the leading Russian universities: Current position and prospects of further development. Universitetskoe upravlenie: Praktika i analiz= University Management: Practice and Analysis, 101(1), 32–43 (in Russian).
  • Dubois P., Rochet J.-C., Schlenker J.-M. (2014). Productivity and mobility in academic research: Evidence from mathematicians. Scientometrics, 98, 1669–1701.
  • Dyachenko E.L. (2017). Internal migration of scientists in Russia and the USA: The case of physicists. Scientometrics, 113(1), 105–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2478-8
  • Ejermo O., Fassio C., Källström J. (2020). Does mobility across universities raise scientific productivity? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 603–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12346
  • Gahungu A. (2011). Integration of foreign-born faculty in academia: Foreignness as an asset. The International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1), 1–22.
  • Gomez C.J., Herman A.C., Parigi P. (2020). Moving more, but closer: Mapping the growing regionalization of global scientific mobility using ORCID. Journal of Informetrics, 14(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101044
  • Halevi G., Moed H. F., Bar-Ilan J. (2016). Researchers’ mobility, productivity and impact: Case of top producing authors in seven disciplines. Publishing Research Quarterly, 32, 22–37.
  • Koksharov V.A., Agarkov G.A. (2018). International scientific migration: Progress or a threat to Russia’s scientific and technological security. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 14(1), 243–252. DOI: 10.17059/2018–1–19 (in Russian).
  • Melikyan A.V., Zheleznov B.V. (2012). A portrait of an international employee of a Russian higher education institution. Voprosy obrazovaniya=Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 259–277 (in Russian).
  • Robinson-Garcia N. et al. (2019). The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 50–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.002
  • Welch A.R. (1997). The peripatetic professor: The internationalization of the academic profession. Higher Education, 34, 323–345.
  • Yurevich M.A., Aushkap D.S. (2018). Brain drain in computer and information sciences: A bibliometric estimate. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo=Information Society, 6, 46–53 (in Russian).
  • Zadumkin K.A., Terebova S.V. (2009). The international technical and scientific cooperation: The nature, content and forms. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 3, 22–30 (in Russian).
  • Zheleznov B.V., Melikyan A.V. (2012). Participation of international faculty in the development of Russian universities. Universitetskoe upravlenie: Praktika i analiz=University Management: Practice and Analysis, 82(6), 38–44 (in Russian).
  • Zolotarev D.V. et al. (2019). Monitoring of interaction of Russian scientific and educational organizations with foreign scientists. Upravlenie naukoi i naukometriya=Science Governance and Scientometrics, 14(2), 292–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33873/2686-6706.2019.14-2.292-330 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная