Methodology for determining the spatial potential of agglomeration effects: the case of the Saint Petersburg agglomeration

Автор: Olifir D.I.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Regional economy

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Modern methodological approaches and techniques for studying agglomeration effects are aimed at determining and evaluating the spatial potentials of development and interaction of territories of various hierarchical levels. But the possibilities of modern software that allows detecting intraagglomeration spatial reserves - spatial potentials - on cartographic models are not taken into account. The work uses spatial-functional and synergetic (agglomeration) approaches, as well as potential method, statistical method and cartographic modeling. We reveal the theoretical basis for the formation of spatial potentials in the intra-agglomeration environment and propose a methodological approach to their determination based on agglomeration effects of demographic, settlement and economic structures of the Saint Petersburg agglomeration. According to the calculations obtained, we design cartographic models that correspond to the structures under consideration and reflect spatial potentials of agglomeration effects, which are represented by groups of five clusters. The levels of clusters of spatial potentials and their configurations are obtained with the help of the neural network software “Surfer Golden Software”. We find that groups of clusters within the demographic and settlement potentials structure - gravitational, high-potential, medium-potential and low-potential - have smaller territorial impact areas in contrast to similar groups of clusters of economic structure. At the same time, a very low-potential cluster of demographic and settlement structure significantly exceeds the area of the similar cluster of economic structure and spreads beyond the cities located in the eastern and southeastern parts of the Saint Petersburg agglomeration periphery. The areas for future research are related to the development of new methodological approaches and techniques aimed at searching for and modeling agglomeration effects and their spatial potentials in the functional structures of individual cities, urban agglomerations or regions (investment, innovation, environmental, transport, service, cultural and other structures). Another promising area consists in determining spatial potentials based on the agglomeration effects of individual large enterprises with the help of quantitative indicators reflecting their performance effectiveness; this direction is difficult to implement due to the lack of open statistical data.

Еще

Urban agglomeration, saint petersburg agglomeration, intra-agglomeration environment, agglomeration effect, potential, demographic and settlement structure, economic structure, cluster

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147243849

IDR: 147243849   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.2.92.6

Список литературы Methodology for determining the spatial potential of agglomeration effects: the case of the Saint Petersburg agglomeration

  • Burakov N.A., Rubinstein A.Ya. (2020). Theoretical and applied aspects of measuring the economic growth potential of Russian regions. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 16(1), 24–50. DOI: doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.1.024-050 (in Russian).
  • Cellmer R. (2023). Local amenities – spatial modeling of market potential based on open data. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 31(4), 57–64. DOI: 10.2478/remav-2023-0030
  • Chen L., Yu L., Yin J., Xi M. (2023). Impact of population density on spatial differences in the economic growth of urban agglomerations: The case of Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China. Sustainability, 19(15), 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/su151914601
  • Encarnacion R., Magnaye D., Castro A.G. (2023). Spatial analysis of local competitiveness: Relationship of economic dynamism of cities and municipalities in major regional metropolitan areas in the Philippines. Sustainability, 15(2), 1–24. DOI: 10.3390/su15020950
  • Evteev O.A. (1969). Map of the potential of the settlement field as a special type of representation of the population of the territory. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya=Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography, 2, 72–76 (in Russian).
  • Friedmann J. (1966). Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press.
  • Gusein-Zade S.M., Mikheeva V.S., Khanin S.E. (1988). Modeling of territorial socio-economic systems. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya=Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography, 3, 14–20 (in Russian).
  • Kolomak E.A., Sherubneva A.I. (2023). Assessment of the significance of agglomeration effects in the South of Siberia. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 19(1), 52–69. DOI: 10.14530/se.2023.1.052-069 (in Russian).
  • Lavrikova Yu.G., Suvorova A.V. (2020). Optimal spatial organization of the regional economy: Search for parameters and dependencies. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 16(4), 1017–1030. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-1 (in Russian).
  • Lima L., Maraschin C., Giaccom B., Giusti C. (2023). Urban spatial configuration and interactions with retail activities: An approach based on contact. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4355129. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4355129
  • Makarova M.N. (2021). Modeling socio-demographic asymmetry of territorial development. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 14(2), 29–42. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.2 (in Russian).
  • Manesh S.N., Choi J.O., Shrestha B.K. et al. (2020). Spatial analysis of the gender wage gap in architecture, civil engineering, and construction occupations in the United States. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4), 1–15. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000780
  • Mansour Sh., Saleh E., Al-Awadhi T. (2020). The effects of sociodemographic characteristics on divorce rates in Oman: Spatial modeling of marital separations. The Professional Geographer, 72(3), 332–347. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1730196
  • Medvedkov Yu.V. (1965). Ekonomgeograficheskaya izuchennost’ raionov kapitalisticheskogo mira. Vyp. 2. Prilozheniya matematiki v ekonomicheskoi geografii [Economgeographic Study of the Areas of the Capitalist World. Issue 2. Applications of Mathematics in Economic Geography]. Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii AN SSSR.
  • Mezhevich N.M., Olifir D.I. (2023). Comparative analysis of the territorial support frame of settlement in coastal areas: The case of St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad regions. Baltic Region, 1(2), 23–40. DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-2
  • Naumov I.V. (2019). Investigation of the interregional relationships in the processes of sharping the territories’ investment potential using the methods of spatial modelling. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 15(3), 720–735. DOI: 10.17059/2019-3-8 (in Russian).
  • Olifir D.I. (2022). Comparative analysis of the spatial structures of the Moscow and St. Petersburg agglomerations. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 18(1), 73–100. DOI: 10.14530/se.2022.1.073-100 (in Russian).
  • Olifir D.I. (2023). Spatial differentiation of socio-economic development of the St. Petersburg Agglomeration. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 34(1), 42–50. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700723010148
  • Pankratov A.A., Musaev R.A., Badina S.V. (2021). Approaches to identifying, measuring and predicting cluster effects. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 186(3), 126–134. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-186-126-134 (in Russian).
  • Rastvortseva S.N., Snitko L.T. (2020). Regional specialization and agglomeration effects in the Russian economy. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(3), 46–58. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.4 (in Russian).
  • Rybkin A.V., Baburin V.L. (2019). Estimating agglomeration processes potential in territorial socio-economic systems (Irkutsk urban agglomeration case). Regional’nye issledovaniya, 66(4), 4–19. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2019-4-1 (in Russian).
  • Spijker J., Recaño-Valverde J., Martínez S., Carioli A. (2021). Mortality by cause of death in Colombia: A local analysis using spatial econometrics. Journal of Geographical Systems, 23(2), 161–207. DOI: 10.1007/s10109-020-00335-1
  • Stewart J.Q. (1941). An inverse distance variation for certain social influences. Science, New Series, 93(2404), 89–90.
  • Suvorova A.V. (2019). Development of growth poles in the Russian Federation: Direct and reverse effects. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(6), 110–128. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.6 (in Russian).
  • Yang Y., Caset F., Derudder B. (2023). Does urban polycentricity contribute to regional economic growth? Empirical evidence from a panel of Chinese urban regions. Regional Studies, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2023.2255623
  • Zhang S., Ding J., Zheng H., Wang H. (2023). Does spatial functional division in urban agglomerations reduce negative externalities in large cities? Evidence from urban agglomerations in China. Heliyon, 9(10), 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20419
Еще
Статья научная