Methods for analyzing economic and social development of smart cities

Methods for analyzing economic and social development of smart cities

Автор: Popov Evgeny V., Semyachkov Konstantin A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Development of science, technology and innovation

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The purpose of the study is to develop a typology of methods for analyzing economic and social development of smart cities. Having reviewed the works indexed in the global database Web of Science Core Collection we selected one and a half hundred articles on economic problems of smart cities development published in 2015-2021 and available in the public domain. We identify various methods for analyzing economic and social development of smart cities, differentiate them using the method of describing the objects under consideration (static and dynamic) and the method of model description (tables, diagrams, matrices, graphs). Static methods include methods for assessing ecosystem characteristics, input-output analysis, development diagrams, data ecosystems coordination analysis, assessment of the ecosystem for elderly residents. Dynamic methods include the Value Creation - Value Capturing matrices, stimulating management elements, “digital ecosystems - entrepreneurial ecosystems”, graphs showing the life cycle of the smart city ecosystem, evolution of civil ecosystems, stage-by-stage digital transformation, dynamic opportunities for innovation and the quadruple helix. We show the applicability of methods for analyzing the development of smart cities for various territories. We present our own results of assessment of the development of smart cities in Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Oslo, Singapore based on the 7I-model (infrastructure, institutions, intranet, integration, interfaces, innovations, implementation). Theoretical significance of the results obtained consists in the development of a theory of ecosystem analysis related to assessing the formation of smart cities; practical significance of the results lies in the development of applied tools for strategic planning in the field of smart city project development.

Еще

Smart cities, analysis methods, static methods, dynamic methods, tables, diagrams, matrices, graphs

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238034

IDR: 147238034   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.7

Список литературы Methods for analyzing economic and social development of smart cities

  • Bliss D., Garbos R., Kane P., Kharchenko V., Kochanski T. Rucinski A. (2021). Homo digitus: Its dependable and resilient smart ecosystem. Smart Cities, 4, 514–531.
  • Brock K., Ouden E., Klauw K., Podoynitsyna K., Langerak F. (2019). Light the way for smart cities: Lessons from Philips Lighting. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 142, 194–209.
  • Certoma C. (2020). Digital social innovation and urban space: A critical geography agenda. Urban Planning, 5(4), 8–19.
  • Chambers J., Evans J. (2020). Informal urbanism, and the Internet of Things: Reliability, trust, and the reconfiguration of infrastructure. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2918–2935.
  • Claudel M. (2018). From organizations to organizational fields: The evolution of civic innovation ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(6), 34–47.
  • Colding J., Wallhagen M., Sorqvist P., Marcus L., Hillman K., Samuelsson K., Barthel S. (2020). Applying a system perspective on the notion of the smart city. Smart Cities, 3(22), 1–10.
  • Coletta C., Heaphy L., Kitchin R. (2019). From the accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of “smart Dublin”. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 349–364.
  • Derlukiewicz N., Mempel-Sniezyk A. (2018). European cities in the face of sustainability development. Ekonomia I Pravo. Economics and Law, 17(2), 125–135.
  • Elberzhager F., Mennig P., Polst S., Scherr S., Stupfert P. (2021). Towards a digital ecosystem for a smart city district: Procedure, results, and lessons learned. Smart Cities, 4, 686–716.
  • Engel J.S., Berbegal-Mirabent J., Pique J.M. (2018). The renaissance of the city as a cluster of innovation. Cogent Business and Management, 5, 1532777, 1–20.
  • Engin Z. Dijk J., Lan T., Longley P.A., Treleaven P., Batty M., Penn A. (2020). Data-driven urban management: Mapping the landscape. Journal of Urban Management, 9, 1140–1150.
  • Gorelova I., Dmitrieva D., Dedova M., Savastano M. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of digital entrepreneurial ecosystems in the interaction process with smart city development. Administrative Sciences, 11(94), 1–14.
  • Gupta A., Panagiotopoulos P., Bowen F. (2020). An orchestration approach to smart city data ecosystems. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153, 119929, 1–12.
  • Hajikhani A. (2020). Impact of entrepreneurial ecosystem discussions in smart cities: Comprehensive assessment of social media data. Smart Cities, 3, 112–137.
  • Hamalainen M. (2020). Digital transformation in the Helsinki smart city. In: Ratten V. (Ed.). Entrepreneurship and the Community: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Creativity, Social Challenges, and Business. Springer.
  • Hazell E.C. (2020). Disaggregating ecosystem benefits: An integrated environmental-deprivation index. Sustainability, 12, 7589, 1–20.
  • Hirvensalo A., Teerikangas S., Reynolds N.-S., Kalliomaki H., Mantysalo R., Mattila H., Granqvist K. (2021). Agency in circular city ecosystem – a rationalities perspective. Sustainability, 13, 2544, 1–15.
  • Iqbal A., Olariu S. (2021). A survey of enabling technologies for smart communities. Smart Cities, 4, 54–77.
  • Jo S.-S., Han H., Leem Y., Lee S.-H. (2021). Sustainable smart city, and industrial ecosystem; structural and relational changes of the smart city industries in Korea. Sustainability, 13, 9917, 1–17.
  • Kitchin R., Moore-Cherry N. (2020). Fragmented governance, the urban data ecosystem and smart city-regions: The case of metropolitan Boston. Regional Studies, 1735627, 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1735627
  • Kundu D. (2019). Blockchain and trust in a smart city. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 10(1), 31–43.
  • Lee J.W. (2020). Big data strategies for government, society and policy-making. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 475–487.
  • Linde L., Sjodin D., Parida V., Wincent J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 166, 120614, 1–12.
  • Macrorie R., Marvin S., While A. (2021). Robotics and automation in the city: A research agenda. Urban Geography, 42, 2, 197–217.
  • Marston H.R., Shore L., White P.J. (2020). How does a (smart) age-friendly ecosystem look in a post-pandemic society? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 8276, 1–43.
  • Moore J.F. (1997). The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Myeong S., Jung Y., Lee E. (2018). A study on determinant factors in smart city development: An analytical hierarchy process analysis. Sustainability, 10, 2606, 1–17.
  • Nochta T., Wan L., Schooling J.M., Parlikad A.K. (2021). A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: The case of city-scale digital twins. Journal of Urban Technology, 28, 1-2, 263–287.
  • Ooms W., Caniels M.C.J., Roijakkers N., Cobben D. (2020). Ecosystems for smart cities: Tracing the evolution of governance structures in a Dutch Smart City Initiative. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1225–1258.
  • Paskaleva K., Evans J., Watson K. (2021). Co-producing smart cities: A quadruple helix approach to assessment. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28, 4, 395–412.
  • Pierce P., Ricciardi F., Zardini A. (2017). Smart cities as organizational fields: A framework for mapping sustainability-enabling configurations. Sustainability, 9, 1506, 1–21.
  • Popov E., Semyachkov K. (2020). 7I-model for smart city development. Archives of Business Research, 8(7), 143–157.
  • Popov E., Semyachkov K. (2021). Smart city assessment matrix. SHS Web of Conferences, Socio-Economic Sciences, 94, 01019, 1–5.
  • Popov E.V. (2020). Ekonotronika [Econotronics]. Tyumen: Izdatel’stvo Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
  • Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A. (2020). Umnye goroda: monografiya [Smart Cities: Monograph]. Moscow: Yurait.
  • Pulkkinen J., Jussila J., Trotskii A., Laiho A. (2019). Smart mobility: Services, platforms and ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9), 15–24.
  • Raven R., Sengers F., Spaeth P., Xie L., Cheshmehzangi A., Jong M. (2019). Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 258–281.
  • Rehm S.-V., McLoughlin S., Maccani G. (2021). Experimental platforms as bridges to urban sustainability. Smart Cities, 4, 569–587.
  • Robaeyst B., Baccarne B., Duthoo W., Schuurman D. (2021). The city as an experimental environment: The identification, selection and activation of distributed knowledge in regional open innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 13, 6954, 1–18.
  • Rochet C., Correa J.D.P. (2016). Urban lifecycle management: A research program for smart government of smart cities. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado -GeSec, São Paulo, 7(2), 1–20.
  • Ruohomaa H., Salminen V., Kunttu I. (2019). Towards a smart city concept in small cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9), 5–14.
  • Storolli W.G., Makiya I.K., Cesar F.I.G. (2019). Comparative analyses of technological tools between Industry 4.0 and smart cities approaches: The new society ecosystem. Independent Journal if Management & Production, 10(3), 1134–1158.
  • Yuan J., Xie H., Yang D., Xiahou X., Skibniewski M.J., Huang W. (2020). Strategy formulation for the sustainability development of smart cities: A case study of Nanjing, China. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(6), 379–399.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp