Модель сети соавторства научного журнала
Автор: Бредихин С.В., Щербакова Н.Г.
Журнал: Проблемы информатики @problem-info
Рубрика: Прикладные информационные технологии
Статья в выпуске: 3 (60), 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Традиционный подход к изучению сети научного соавторства основан на бинарных отношениях, возникающих между авторами, создавшими по крайней мере одну совместную публикацию. В работе представлена модель сети соавторства, учитывающая групповые отношения, возникающие между соавторами. Сеть моделируется с помощью гиперграфа, вершины которого соответствуют авторам, а ребра - публикациям. Представлен метод построения гиперграфа сети соавторства, основанный на данных, извлеченных из архива журнала. Измерены параметры гиперграфа и выявлены его топологические свойства. Данная работа продолжает изучение и апробацию методов анализа сетей соавторства (см. [1]).
Комплексная сеть, гиперграф, соавторство, архив научных статей, библиометрия
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143181006
IDR: 143181006 | УДК: 519.177 | DOI: 10.24412/2073-0667-2023-3-5-18
Scientific journal co-authorship network model
The traditional representation of a complex system (CS) in the form of a network or a graph makes it possible to identify many aspects of the system’s behavior, see [2-4]. The network is based on pairwise relationships between network objects. In this case, the nodes of the co-authorship network correspond to the authors, and the edge between the nodes is constructed if there is at least one publication in which both authors participated, see the fundamental works [5, 6]. Such a model is able to express many complex properties of CS, its advantage lies in its simplicity and the ability to use graph theory in the analysis. The model has been studied quite well in terms of the distribution of degrees of network nodes [5], ranking of authors [6], dynamics of evolution [7, 8], identification of communities [9], and prediction of new co-author relations [10, 11]. However, this CS modeling does not reveal all the information that can be extracted directly from the list of articles and their authors, for example, does not reflect the total number of articles prepared by co-authors. To overcome this shortcoming, several methods for constructing networks of co-authorship, extending the traditional approach, were considered, see [6, 12]. But fixing only binary relations between system objects excludes interaction involving groups of network objects. A possible solution to the problem is to generalize the pair interaction to the interaction of an arbitrary set of nodes. In this case, the networks are called hypcrnctworks. The main mathematical structures used as a CS model include bipartite graphs, hypergraphs, and simplicial complexes [13]. The concept of a hypcrgraph [20] was proposed in [21] as applied to the analysis of CSs and providing a computationally feasible tool that can be adapted to many analytical situations. In the study of co-authorship, as a rule, the nodes corresponding to the authors form a hyperedge in the case of a joint publication [22, 23]. This paper presents a co-authorship network model that takes into account group relationships that arise between co-authors. The network is modeled using a hypcrgraph whose vertices correspond to authors and whose edges correspond to scientific articles (SA). The data we analyze is extracted from the electronic archive (https://www.dia-endojournals.ru/jour/issue/archive) of the quarterly scientific and practical medical peer-reviewed journal Diabetes Mellitus (ISSN 2072-0378), published since 1998. The journal is indexed in the international abstract and full-text databases. The hypcrgraph Hca, built oil the basis of the selected archive data, has size m(Hca) = 991 and order n(Hca') = 1694. Since only those SAs that have two or more authors are considered, there are no loops in the constructed hypergraph. The hypergraph Hca is not connected, it consists of 97 components, of which 68 components have one edge, the maximum component includes about 64.75 % vertices (authors) and 67.4% edges (articles). The parameters of the hypcrgraph (and its components) are measured and its topological properties (simple, star, strong star, conformal, Holly) are revealed. The use of the hypcrgraph language allows to get an idea of the shape of cooperation in the system under consideration. Most of the authors of the co-authored journal articles are indirectly related to each other due to the presence of joint works. The vertex degree distributions (the maximal component) have a long tail, i.e. most authors have a small number of joint SAs. The same can be said about the distribution of edge degrees, indicating that most SAs have a small number of co-authors. All components, except for the maximal, have one or another considered property. Moreover, the properties of conformity and Helly are common to all components, regardless of size and order. The property of simplicity is more characteristic of components with a small number of edges, the same can be said about the probability of being a star. Two components have all the considered properties. It should be noted that based on the incidence matrix of a hypergraph, a traditional network of co-authorship can be built, in which two authors are connected if they have at least one joint work. The associated multigraph G(Hca') is one of the models of such a network in which the weight of an edge between two authors is equal to the number of joint works. This work continues the study and approbation of methods for analyzing networks of co-authorship, see [1].
Список литературы Модель сети соавторства научного журнала
- БРЕДИХИН С. В., ЛЯПУНОВ В. М., ЩЕРБАКОВА Н. Г. Гиперсеть научного соавторства. Анализ данных БД Repec // Пробл. информ. 2022. К2 4. С. 70-83. DOI: 10.24412/2073-0667-2022¬4-70-83.
- NEWMAN М. Е. J. Networks: An introduction. Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. ISBN: 9780199206650.
- ESTRADA Е. The structure of complex network: Theory and applications. Oxford Univ. Press, 2011. ISBN: 9780199591756.
- LATORA V., NICOSIA V., Russo G. Complex networks: Principles, methods and applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017. ISBN: 9781316216002.
- NEWMAN, M. E. J. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results // Phys. Rev. 2001. E 64, 016131. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.
- NEWMAN, M. E. J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality // Phys. Rev. 2001. E 64, 016132. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132.
- BARABASI A. L., JEONG H., NEDA Z., RAVASZ E., SCHUBERT A., VICSEK T. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations // Physica A. 2002. V. 311. P. 590-614. DOI: 10.1016/S0378- 4371(02)00736-7.
- UDDIN S., HOSSAIN L., ABBASI A., RASMUSSEN K. Trend and efficiency analysis of coauthorship network // Scientometrics. 2012. V. 90, No 2. P. 687-699. DOI: 10.1007/sl 1192-011-0511-x.
- SAVIC M., IVANOVIC NT, RADOVANOVIC NT, OGNJANOVIC Z., PEJOVIC A. Exploratory analysis of communities in co-authorship networks: A case study // Intern. Conf, on ICT Innovations. Springer, 2019. P. 55-64. ISBN 978-3-319-91194-6.
- Сно H., YU Y. Link prediction for interdisciplinary collaboration via co-authorship network // Soc. Network Analysis and Mining. 2018. 8, 25. DOI: 10.1007/sl3278-018-0501-6.
- CHUAN P.M., SON L.H., ALI M. ET AL. Link prediction in co-authorship networks based on hybrid content similarity metric // Appl. Intell. 2018. V. 48. P. 2470-2486. DOI: 10.1007/sl0489-017- 1086-x.
- YOSHIKANE F., NOZAWA T., TSUJI K. Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas// Scientometrics. 2006. V. 68, iss. 3. P. 643-655. DOI: 10.1007/slll92-006-0113-l.
- ЩЕРБАКОВА H. Г. Моделирование групповых взаимодействий комплексных систем. Обзор // Пробл. информ. 2022. № 3. С. 24-45. DOL 10.24412/2073-0667-2022-3-24-45.
- WILSON Т. Р. Relational networks: An extension of sociometric concepts // Soc. Networks. 1982. V. 4, iss. 2. P. 105-116. DOL 10.1016/0378-8733(82)90028-4.
- BORGATTI S. P., EVERETT M. G. Network analysis of 2-mode data // Soc. networks. 1997. V. 19. P. 243-269. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2.
- FAUST K. Centrality in affiliation networks // Soc. Networks. 1997. V. 19. P. 157-191. DOI: 10.1016/80378-8733(96)00300-0.
- WASSERMAN S., FAUST K. Social network analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984. ISBN 9780511815478.
- BENKO G., FLAMM C., STADLER P. F. Generic properties of chemical networks: Artificial chemistry based on graph rewriting//Leet. Notes Comput. Sci. 2003. V. 2801, 10. DOL 10.1007/978- 3-540-39432-7_2.
- BANERJEE S., JENAMANI NL, PRATHAR D. K. Properties of a projected network of a bipartite network // arXiv:1707.00912vl. DOL 10.48550/arXiv.l707.00912.
- BERGE C. Graphs and hypergraphs. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976. ISBN 10.0444103996.
- SEIDMAN S. Structures induced by collections of subsets: A hypergraph approach // Math. Soc. Sci. 1981. V. 1, iss. 4. P. 381-396. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4896(81)90016-0.
- ESTRADA E., RODRIGUEZ-VELAZQUEZ J. A. Complex networks as hypergraphs // arXiv: physics/0505137, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.002.
- HAN Y., ZHOU B., PEI J., JIA Y. Understanding importance of collaborations in coauthorship networks: A supportiveness analysis approach // Proc. 2009 SIAM Internal. Conf, on Data Mining. 2009. P. 1112-1123. DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611972795.95.
- LUNG R. L, GASCO N., SUCIU M. A. A hypergraph model for representing scientific output // Scientometrics. 2018. V. 117. P. 1361-1379. DOL 10.1007/sl 1192-018-2908-2.
- ATKIN R. Н. From cohomology in physics to q-connectivity in social science // Intern. J. Man-Machine Studies. 1972. V. 4, iss. 2. P. 139-167. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7373(72)80029-4.
- ATKIN R. H. An algebra for patterns on a complex, I // Intern. J. Man-Machine Studies. 1974. V. 6, iss. 3. P. 285-307. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7373(74)80024-6.
- ATKIN R. H. An algebra for patterns on a complex, II // Intern. J. Man-Machine Stud. 1976. V. 8, iss. 5. P. 483-498. DOI: 10.1016/80020-7373(76)80015-6.
- PATANIA A., PETRI G., VACCARINO F. The shape of collaborations // EPJ Data Science. 2017. V. 6, 18. DOI 10.1140/epjds/sl3688-017-0114-8.
- ZHOU D., ORSHANSKIY S. A., ZHA H., GILES C. L. Co-ranking authors and documents in a heterogeneous network // 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007), Omaha (USA), 2007. P. 739-744. DOI: 10.1109/ICDM.2007.57.
- VOLOSHIN V. I. Introduction to graph and hypergraph theory. NY: Nova Science Publ., 2009. ISBN: 978-1-60692372-6.
- BRETTO A. Hypergraph theory. Springer, 2013. ISBN 978-3-319-00079-4.
- КОРМЕН T., ЛЕЙЗЕРСОН Ч., РИВЕСТ T. Алгоритмы: построение и анализ. М.: МЦНМО. 2002. ISBN: 978-5-907114-11-1