Modern territorial and socio-demographic specifics of long-distance commuting in Russia

Автор: Korolenko A.V., Kalachikova O.N.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The uneven spatial development of Russia is manifested not only in the heterogeneity of residents’ settlement, but also in the transformation of the socio-economic sphere, including local labor markets shrinkage, which inevitably affects migration mobility. One of the most common types of migration is return short-term labor migration (otkhodnichestvo), in particular, long-distance commuting. Taking into account the socio-economic and socio-cultural contrasts of urban and rural areas, it is important to understand the differences in the scale of long-distance commuting and in the portrait of migrants themselves. The aim of the research is to assess regional differences in the contribution of rural and urban population to long-distance commuting, to identify socio-demographic characteristics of rural and urban rotational labor migrants. The information base includes data from the All-Russian Population Census-2020 and the selective monitoring of the use of the daily temporal resource by the It is confirmed that rural population is more involved in long-distance commuting. Despite the fact that urban and rural long-distance commuting workers are involved mainly in long-term migration, the proportion of long-term departures is noticeably higher among the former, while shortterm trips are more common among the latter. It is established that the majority of urban residents leave for work to other regions, while every third long-distance commuting migrant from rural areas leaves for work within the region of their residence. It is shown that Russia’s regions are markedly differentiated by the share of urban and rural residents in the total number of long-distance commuting migrants, and by the ratio of the contribution of urban and rural residents to general, short-term and long-term longdistance commuting, as well as intraregional and interregional long-distance commuting work. Typical features were confirmed in the socio-demographic portrait of long-distance commuting migrants, and rural-urban differences were revealed.

Еще

Otkhodnichestvo, long-distance commuting, rural-urban differences, socio-demographic portrait

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147245852

IDR: 147245852   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.12

Список литературы Modern territorial and socio-demographic specifics of long-distance commuting in Russia

  • Antonov E.V. (2016). Labor mobility of the population in Russia (according to the 2010 All-Russian Census data). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya=Lomonosov Geography Journal, 2, 54–63 (in Russian).
  • Averkieva K.V. (2013). Sel’skaya mestnost’ Nechernozem’ya: depopulyatsiya i vozmozhnye puti adaptatsii k novym usloviyam [Rural Areas of the Non-Black Earth Region: Depopulation and Possible Ways of Adaptation to New Conditions]. Moscow: Kodeks (in Russian).
  • Averkieva K.V. (2016). Labor markets and role of “otkhodnichestvo” in the employment of rural residents of Non-Chernozem zone of Russia. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya, 1, 25–37 (in Russian).
  • Averkieva K.V., Antonov E.V., Kirillov P.L. (2016). Mezhdu domom… i domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobil’nost’ naseleniya Rossii [Between Home... and Home. Return Spatial Mobility of the Russian Population]. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf (in Russian).
  • Burkin S.L. (1978). The number of otkhodniki in Russia at the end of the 19th century. Voprosy istorii, 9, 201–205 (in Russian).
  • Fielding A. (1989). Migration and counter urbanization in Western Europe since 1950. Geographical Journal, 155, 60–69. DOI: 10.2307/635381
  • Florinskaya Yu.F., Mkrtchyan N.V., Maleva T.M. (2015). Migratsiya i rynok truda [Migration and Labor Market.]. Moscow: Delo.
  • Fokin V.Ya. (2016). Agricultural enterprises’ liquidation influence on shift migration of villagers. Diskussiya=Discussion, 6(69), 84–90 9 (in Russian).
  • Halfacree K. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter-urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), 209–224. DOI: 10.1002/psp.665
  • Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. (2012). Spatial mobility potential of the unemployed in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2, 40–53 (in Russian).
  • Kasatkina N.P., Kirdyashkina T.I., Kurmyshkina O.N. (2023). Vakhtovye rabotniki iz Mordovii: kontury sotsia’noi gruppy [Long-Distance Workers from Mordovia: Contours of the Social Group]. Saransk: Mordovia State University.
  • Korolenko A.V. (2023). Long-distance commuting as a kind of otkhodnichestvo: Scale, causes and effects. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 27(6), 191–212. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.6.128.12 (in Russian).
  • Leksin V.N. (2021). New otkhodnichestvo and shift labor organization in the processes of depopulati on and settlement of territories. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya=Region: Economics and Sociology, 3(111), 133–153. DOI: 10.15372/REG20210306 (in Russian).
  • Makhrova A.G., Babkin R.A., Kirillov P.L. (2022). Studying and estimating temporary mobility and population pulsations in space of modern Russia. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya, 86(3), 332–352. DOI: 10.31857/S2587556622030104 (in Russian).
  • Mkrtchyan N.V., Florinskaya Yu.F. (2016). Socio-economic effects of labor migration from small towns of Russia. Voprosy ekonomiki, 4, 103–123 (in Russian).
  • Mkrtchyan N.V., Florinskaya Yu.F. (2019). Residents of small and mid-size towns of Russia: Labor migration as an alternative to permanent transfer. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=Journal of the New Economic Association, 3(43), 78–94. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2019-43-3-4 (in Russian).
  • Nefedova T.G. (2015a). Employment of population and a phenomenon of seasonal work in the Stavropol Krai. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya=Lomonosov Geography Journal, 2, 93–100 (in Russian).
  • Nefedova T.G. (2015b). Migration activity of population and migrant workers in modern Russia. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya, 3, 41–56 (in Russian).
  • Nefedova T.G., Mkrtchyan N.V. (2017). Migration of rural population and dynamics of agricultural employment in the regions of Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya=Lomonosov Geography Journal, 58–67 (in Russian).
  • Nefedova T.G., Pokrovskii N.E., Treivish A.I. (2015). Urbanization, desurbanization and rural-urban communities in the context of increasing horizontal mobility. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 12, 60–69 (in Russian).
  • Plyusnin Yu.M., Zausaeva Ya.D., Zhidkevich N.N. (2013). Otkhodniki: monografiya [Otkhodniki: Monograph]. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf.
  • Roshchina T.G. (2007). Labor migration as a factor in improving the standard of living of the population of small towns in Russia. Vestnik RAN, 77(9), 827–830 (in Russian).
  • Ryndzyunsky P.G. (1983). Krest’yane i gorod v kapitalisticheskoi Rossii vtoroi poloviny XIX veka: vzaimootnoshenie goroda i derevni v sotsial’no-ekonomicheskom stroe Rossii [Peasants and the City in Capitalist Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century: the Relationship between the City and the Village in the Socio-Economic System of Russia]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Shabanova M.A. (1992). Modern otkhodnichestvo as a socio-cultural phenomenon. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 4, 55–63 (in Russain).
  • Sheller M., Urry J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. DOI: 10.1068/a37268
  • Sokolova A.A., Kalachikova O.N. (2023). Modern return labor migration: Analysis of territorial specificity according to the Russian census. In: Demograficheskie faktory adaptatsii naseleniya k global'nym sotsial'no-ekonomicheskim vyzovam: sb. nauch. st. [Demographic Drivers of Population Adaptation to Global Socio-Economic Challenges: Collection of Scientific Articles]. Yekaterinburg: Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN. DOI: 10.17059/udf-2023-3-7 (in Russian).
  • Solodnikov A.Yu. (20150. The state of hydrocarbon resources base in Tyumen Region. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekologiya i prirodopol’zovanie=Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology, 2(2), 50–61 (in Russian).
  • Swiaczny F., Graze P., Schlömer C. (2009). Spatial impacts of demographic change in Germany. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 33, 181–205. DOI: 10.1007/s12523-009-0010-9
  • Tikhonov B.V. (1978). Pereseleniya v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX v.: po materialam perepisi 1897 g. i pasportnoi statistiki [Resettlement in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century: On the Materials of the 1897 Census and Passport Statistics]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Turakaev M.S., Baimurzina G.R. (2022). A fly-in fly-out work through the eyes of temporary labor migrants from Bashkortostan. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 26(6), 115–133. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2022.6.122.7 (In Russian).
  • Valetov T.Ya. (2008). Self-organized seasonal brigades (shabashniki) in the USSR in the 1960s–1980s: Economic and social aspects. In: Borodkin L.I (Ed.). Ekonomicheskaya istoriya. Obozrenie. Vypusk 14 [Economic History. Review. Issue 14]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU (in Russian).
  • Zaionchkovskaya Zh.A. (1991). Demograficheskaya situatsiya i rasselenie [Demographic Situation and Settlement]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Zelinsky W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2), 219–249. DOI: 10.2307/213996
  • Zhidkevich N.N. (2016). Social portrait of a modern Russian otkhodnik. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 19(1), 73–89 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная