Nature and antroposocial phenomenon of nuclear energy

Here is my mission - to sit quietly by the water and reduce the life of one section of a grain of sand and stars. Lead to a system of the heart of the sun and me.

And hear, as in spring grove oriole sings.

And see how the fathomless sky - is no room for the chest!

Salt crust of bread, eat it and ...

Again, in a way…

Т. Polejaeva

Echo of field’s seasons. Poems. Arkhangelsk.

During more than 10 years of different researchers on the base of more than 10 Russian and foreign universities formed the scientific and pragmatic attitude, experience the problem and obtain some results. It is useful, of course, outline the conceptual space to natural, anthropic and social aspects of nuclear energy, and suggest the working version of the main concepts.

The phenomenon of nuclear energy. The appearance of the phenomenon of nuclear energy (controlled and uncontrolled fission and fusion reactions) is varied. Material and essentially it is formed as a natural (known and unknown to man) and man-made entities. In a simple listing of the "first approximation" - is the star, cosmic radiation, the heat of the subsoil and the natural radioactivity of the Earth, the natural nuclear reactors. As well as nuclear weapons, nuclear deterrence and nonproliferation, civil nuclear energy, military and civilian nuclear power, submarines and surface ships, surface and underground nuclear facilities for various purposes. In addition, this durable energy sources for space exploration, scientific instrumentation and process control and impact in medicine, agriculture and industry, radioactive waste with a shelf life of hundreds of thousands of years. Well-known (and unknown as a separate part of) the natural and man-made nuclear entities represent, albeit in varying degrees, the scope of intellectual and practical interests and actions of people associated "ether" of human attention.

Antropo – social component of the phenomenon of the nuclear energy. It's all positive and negative, of natural and man-made signs and effects of nuclear energy in people's lives, that nuclear energy by the different systems of characters in one way or another been identified by the society in his mental space. All of our problems and challenges, hope and caring, successful and unsuccessful ideas and practices with which it directly or indirectly. All the phenomena of humanity, which depends on nuclear energy. All the phenomena of humanity, on which the "being" of nuclear energy in contact with humanity. All the phenomena of humanity, which are developed in conjunction with the phenomenon of nuclear energy. Communication, dependence and interaction in the cosmological sense, the former for the most part, at least with respect to the period of existence of living matter, almost always, but especially now, with the emergence of nuclear techno sphere - the eternal and important components of the environment of human existence. And our natural science and technical, philosophical and religious, spiritual and humanitarian based on other and different kinds of social knowledge of reflection, as well as our changing them. In other words, a component of nuclear antropo - social phenomenon - it is therefore the material and spiritual dichotomy of man, a complex material and spiritual existence of man in the universe of nuclear and nuclear society.

Sozio –nuclear atrophic principe – is the requirement of reflection and action in the future antropo – social component of the phenomenon of nuclear energy formed in the overall secularreligious "field" of the best spiritual and humanitarian and man-made heritage of humanity, it was adequate and positively involved in the generation of new layers of material and spiritual culture "to nuclear man "was a humane and positive" kulturogennym."In other words, this requirement optimize "parameters antropo –social and nuclear universe" in terms of human welfare, through liberalization and humanization of intellectual and practical activity in the nuclear field.

The phenomenon of nuclear energy in the past, present and future was, is and will be extremely important for the people. Nuclear energy is associated with strong bonds of humanity. And mankind has felt like one that exists and fragile for the first time a nuclear threat. Man-made nuclear or nuclear risk benefit for mankind - for the most part still on the individual and society. And then, and another - is a "flesh" of the mind, heart and hands of men. This forms the feedback - the impact of such person as it is and what will be the possible consequences of nuclear phenomena. Super global values, negative and positive possibilities of the challenges of nuclear energy should correspond to an adequate effort, complexity and completeness, and consistency of activity approaches for understanding and action, containment or adapting to the real conditions of humanity of these properties of the phenomenon. As well as serious questions about the readiness of people to take heart and mind of coexisting with nuclear energy, now and in the future.

Nuclear phenomenon has rightly become the subject of careful study of philosophy, political science, economics and ecology. Came to the attention of other sciences, religion, spiritual creativity, and human culture. And this attention is the prospect of there age. Two German philosophers in the context of the general methodology can be considered as key players in the treatment of the topic. This Jaspers and E. Cassirer. The first (mostly the work of [1], see also its fragmentary translation and analysis in [2]), motivation, and asked the way to finding antropo – social and nuclear angles, as well as establishing the scope of scientific problems. The second (by a series of works on the philosophy of human culture and symbolic forms, which are described in detail in [3, 4]) "suggests" a socio-cultural nature of the knowledge and tools along the way.

There is a tendency in the line with the spiritual and humanitarian understanding of global issues to the ambivalent perception of the phenomenon of nuclear energy in the entire available today its fullness. It is advisable to strengthen integrated in meaningful ways, the general cognitive experience, poly-and interdisciplinary respect to the sciences of man and society and non-scientific knowledge about human, system and activity-oriented joint reflection of human civilization, and nuclear energy. Reflection combines them to coexist-existence and interaction as a respect for each other external objects, and the fact that nuclear is an integral part of the phenomenon of humanity.

You can define the basic context of nuclear energy with other important events in the destiny of mankind - existential contours antropo - social components of nuclear phenomena. Based on the "logical chain", following the well-known idea of universal unity and unity in diversity, the different faces of which are interpreted by many philosophers, naturalists, writers and politicians, proposed an image diagram of a connected set antropo – social and nuclear combinations of modern "neighborhoods" of nuclear energy. Space of associative links, explicit, semantic, and random coincidences, or as a coincidence, relationships, correlations, it mates and other global phenomena using. As a rule, the social aspects of the interaction of each "chain" doubly directed. The image of the "continuum" manifestations of nuclear energy and antropo - social the phenomenon of "neighborhoods" and nuclear energy contributes to the synthesis and integration of highly specialized "institutional" approach to reflection, the transition from quantity to quality, a jump of thought to understand the need for broad and deep antropo – social -nuclear "watching" integrated and comprehensive action.

Some examples of "logical chain" that characterize the direct or indirect connection, dependence, interaction, correlation, coupling between the nuclear energy (JE) and other important human and human phenomena:

NE – substance, energy, space, time – the universe – the whole world;

NE – The Sun - natural processes in geo-and biospheres - life on Earth;

NE - eschatological potential - a real "quality" of the individual and society;

NE – weapons of mass destruction - the knowledge of mass destruction;

NE – uranium, thorium, underground facilities, nuclear waste - geology, mining;

NE – Fukushima - starting and self-development of disasters;

NE – accident at nuclear power plants, nuclear submarines and nuclear materials - the environment;

NE - Radioactive waste - waste of life in general;

NE - ambivalence - information, bio and other technologies - the person;

NE - nuclear community (NEA, FNCA) - International economic unions;

NE - nuclear activities - oil and gas - the economic and political priorities;

NE – apolegts and opponents - education and awareness;

NE - nuclear Ethics - cultural and religious traditions.

The list of these "chains" of major philosophical and pragmatic and intellectual priority issues, those tasks, activities, and similar facets of society, of course, only as a private limited sample reflects the actual antropo – social and nuclear space and is open to continue. Here it is, above all, the idea of an illustration of the need of an integrated approach to studying the phenomenon of nuclear energy in conjunction with a wide range of scientific topics, practical tasks and reflective, with a variety of symbols and images, possibilities of humanity.

Outlines approaches to strengthening Human Dimension, humanistic and humanitarian things and motivations in antropo - social component of the phenomenon of nuclear energy, a kind of anthropic and social - nuclear positions, or antropo – social and nuclear principle. Successfully appeal to the well-known classical analogue of the anthropic principle, meaningful and consistent for both the major socio-cultural paradigms - the natural sciences, philosophy and religion. Social and nuclear anthropic principle enhances the prospects for the synthesis of a unified secular-religious social and mental (in addition to technology) and the total pragmatic platform for nuclear phenomena. She is oh so necessary now, when, for example, after Fukushima, as well as after the Chernobyl fall sharply again "shares" of nuclear power.

I showed in various publications (in particular, see list below) some examples of fragments considered antropo – social components, their secular and religious, philosophical, economic, historical and political science aspects. As well as information, communication, mental, and ecological modes of modern nuclear society. And methodological way, the tools of their joint judgment, known from history and contoured for the future. In the perspective antropo – social and nuclear challenges and expectations, negative and positive potential denotes the reflexive ideological systems (philosophy, religion), the sciences of man and society, spiritual creativity (art, literature, and myth) and moral traditions. Denotes the potential in the process of information and analysis of socio-nuclear activities.

At the same time in the works I often had to build on the experience antropo – social and nuclear Japan. This is a fairly "rolled" numerous research fellows path (mainly with regard to nuclear strikes in 1945), as well as the experience of Russia and Japan. The potential ligament in this context not only of specific historical events, but also the spiritual and humanitarian heritage of both countries. The works of other authors on a tandem I do not know, but most are unlikely to have been able to do more than hope, to define the contour of «paths

Here are just some aspects of the spiritual and humanitarian considerations. Russia and Japan as the main "suppliers" for the source of the tragic facts of philosophy and humanities understanding of nuclear phenomena. Special of the social group of humanity - are hibakusha, and Chernobyl, and now nuclear kamikaze / samurai. Nuclear images, including fiction (eg, [5]). Hiroshima - is a push to a reassessment of the prospects of humanity and religious concepts (J. Garrison [6] and others). A. Kurosawa, who considers the value of the atomic bombs and civilian nuclear power in the eschatological perspectives of nuclear destruction of Japan through the images of "Fuji in Red" colored radioactive cloud (similar to dark clouds in hell), concentric zones around the lesion epicenter of the explosion in Hiroshima (similar to examples of the hell in Dante).

In The Hiroshima Peace Institute, universities, Memorial and other institutions of Hiroshima international and interdisciplinary research focuses on the integration of the experience of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the strategy of global peace. On such a basic human capacity in Japan, many wrote. In particular, all R. J. Lifton [7] soon after World War II. Perhaps the story so ordered to Japan in the future, had the right to actively and as a leader to make sense of the social implications of nuclear energy and to encourage other countries to this, other people of different faiths. After Fukushima significance of the Japanese mission, no doubt intensify.

Maybe if you look wider, Russia and Japan are destined to share "forge" at least the contours of moral and political life of nuclear targets, checking, including, and Dostoevsky? The creators of the film "In Japan in search of ... Russia" (coordinator K. Yuka, a studio of the Far Eastern University with support from the Japanese Foreign Ministry) believe that Japan and Russia can help each other in the knowledge of ourselves and the world.

In practical terms, nuclear ties between the two countries and was available for. To name just a few examples. Japan has helped to dispose of nuclear submarines Pacific Fleet. She got right to work on uranium ores in Yakutia. Russia and Japan are complicit in the ITER project. Now the country's highest level of Chernobyl nuclear disasters combined and Fukushima. Russia has offered Japan the equipment for cleaning radioactive water, dosimeters and personal protection people. But, in fact, in Fukushima in the liquidation of known effects of greater use of the means of Western origin.

Apparently, the Japanese experts ahead of time, while being on their NPP took into account the Russian practice of seismic constraints on the choice of sites for the stations. But not fully accustomed to the logic and the experience of mistakes and achievements of the first, most difficult weeks of the Chernobyl liquidators. Logic and experience, which have been described [8]. If Chernobyl was a tragic experience learned in full, would hardly, in particular, Fukushima for so long and persistently flooded with water damaged reactor building, which was inefficient in terms of cooling, but has led to significant radioactive contamination of surrounding waters and territory. Only more than a month after the disaster manager’s work, it was announced on the need for (yet to develop!) Alternative cooling water is the new measure. In addition, while Fukushima from the first day was a tragedy not only for Japan but also of universal concern across the globe, many experts, nuclear physicists, meteorologists, physicians and environmentalists, including the Russian, were concerned about the insufficient data on the professional situation, provided by the Japanese side.

At the conference, which was titled "Nuclear energy systems for future generations and the global stability of GLOBAL 2005", held in Japan with a significant share of the Japanese participants, the narrow scope of the specific problems emerged only my report, "Nuclear power: the social and humanitarian aspects." This is one of the reflections of the fact that in the global nuclear energy community, as well as in Japan, developed the ideology of sustainable energy development in the future. But the advantage is that it is a respective branch of the ideology of science, engineering and technology.

In order to build interactive forms of research and the formation of a network of partners I had (at that time as an employee of one of the institutions of United Nations University, UNU)

been published on the Internet and sent more than 90 locations in Japan, a questionnaire on the role and forms of understanding the phenomenon of nuclear energy. A kind of attempt to "philosophical sociology." The response to the questionnaire, it must be said, that it was a negligible. In Murmansk, there was one journalist who refused to answer questions honestly explained: "There is need to think!" From Japan received only two responses. One of them is very remarkable. High-level employee of Nuclear Technology and Education Center of Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute wrote that a long time doubted whether the connection will, if he will take part in the questioned. He explained his desire to respond, first of all, in respect for the brand, which I represent, and the fact that by virtue of their professional interests and the need to have experience of contact with UNU. And evaluates the usefulness of these contacts is very positive. Furthermore, thinking on issues of form, in particular, about antropo - social components, he came to a sudden thought for himself. According to him, surprisingly, almost nothing is known about the complex substantive discussion of the classified nuclear energy, with the exception of issues related to a nuclear bomb.

For the comparison, in the work [9] concluded that the nuclear community in Finland, Sweden and Norway generally have quite positive view of the generated outside interests to him. In particular, on my own, as an ordinary employee of one of the universities of the northern Finland, a request for help in analyzing the characteristics of their external information activities of 100% of the respondents responded to the major nuclear companies. Russian nuclear scientists, in fact, just slightly opened independent humanitarian studies, as well as, probably, their Japanese counterparts.

It is useful to understanding the phenomenon antropo - social components of nuclear energy through international efforts in the field of image SAMPO: meaning in the context of regional Scandinavian (or Slavic, Saida, Severodvinsk, Spitsbergen, Saamen, Syktyvkar, Solikamsk, Siberian, Streltsovsky, Selenge, Salekhard, Sakha, Sakhalin, Simushir , Semipalatinsk, Sarov, Seversk, Slavutich, Sosny) Atomic Mission (the Proliferation's Oikumene) and the universal Special Anthropic Mission (the Power (Prometheus) Obedience). The methodology of the image corresponds to the spirit of the SAMPO initiative of the President of the Russian Federation (2006) for the Global Nuclear Infrastructure and Sciences developed and Rosatom [A. A.Sarkisov.URL: mid=386] for the ideology of the Russian North integrative approach to the problems of nuclear waste. After Fukushima contributed to the debate on the main issue of nuclear technology – is storage of turnover derived from civil and military nuclear materials, as well as the possible return of interest in a small underground nuclear power plants. The methodology takes into account of the obvious desire of Western countries to increase control over the readily available hydrocarbons in the Middle East and Africa. It can be an integral part of reinforcing regional and national programs to create technology platforms "Infrastructure in the Arctic." In an environment where independent estimates (see [10, 11], participants telecast "In Focus" on Channel RBC from 09/03/11 and 23/03/11) indicate the absence of a stable and positive trend of the development of oil and gas business in the Arctic, as well as in the case of projects " Sakhalin-1, 2 "[12] lead to the conclusion that the hope for the attractiveness of offshore development and the economy of the region of the conjugate is not always true.

Semantic content of the image begin to seriously discuss SAMPO. One of my articles is reflected in the official list of bibliographical material to the consideration of the bill of the Republic of Belarus "On the use of nuclear energy." Other published materials fair of innovative projects Atom - Eco 2008. I think the continuation of the discussions to follow, as, for example, specialists of Kola Science Centre proposed to build an underground nuclear storage facility in Kola Bay of the throat (Saida Guba - "underbelly" of Severomorsk and Murmansk) [13]. Foster a kind of "appendix of the first century," the largest city in the Arctic. The second version of the object (Long Zelentsy) offers scientists "at hand" of the future infrastructure of Gazprom and the landfill, which was lost "Kursk". It should be recalled that in Japan (2011), external influences, with catastrophic consequences, not only did not stand the reactors, and storage of nuclear fuel-worked.

The situation is "fueling" the decision of Barack Obama in spite of the current "Policy Act with respect to nuclear waste" in 22 years since the beginning of construction and after the cost of 9 billion dollars to stop the project "guiding star", the prototype of many similar buildings - a national repository of high-level materials Yucca Mountain. Like "postfukusimskoe tsunami" appeared decisions to close nuclear power plants (e.g. in Germany), a logical extension of which should be considered as measures to dismantle the stations with operating large amounts of additional waste, but also appeared earlier in a globalizing world economy, and projects the idea of internationalizing the last stage of treatment nuclear waste, and their reliable isolation from the biosphere.

There are specific questions "how" and "where?" Especially after the entry into force (end 2010) US-Russia Agreement number 123, opening the opportunity for countries to "exchange" of nuclear materials. Perhaps the logic of the answer to one of the options will tell V.A. Perovsky article with the eloquent title, "Where do I get radioactive waste to Said?" The author shows the redundancy of multiple constructed (for lobbying already Germany) in Said Bay facilities for recycling, if you focus only on delivery of the North and the icebreaker fleet [URL: .

Russia has long been actively seeking to positively respond to new opportunities within the concept of international long-term storage underground type on its territory. Storage of the third (highest) level, complementing the system of federal and regional repositories. Accommodation options for international storage sites, the most formal "advanced", no new comprehensive analysis and additional justifications for the nuclear industry has traditionally been "docked" with the objects of heritage, "Cold War" are still the site near Krasnoyarsk, Chelyabinsk, and border with China and Mongolia (Krasnokamensk) At the same time dominated by the choice of sites in areas paleo volcanoes (as in the case of Yucca Mountain). A reference to the interest shown to Krasno-kamensk operated and the largest in Russia uranium ore field. Although the dominant platform is "assigned", even loyal to his analysis (IGEM RAS) based on the geological situation is extremely low intelligence over the recognition that Russia is in the initial stages of program implementation of this concept and make decisions about the suitability of sites is premature [14]. In Kazakhstan and Ukraine are planning similar facilities in the area, respectively, Semipalatinsk test site and the Chernobyl zone.

It is important to remember that the military-industrial nuclear facilities to the Soviet Union, which is now in Russia "tie" international underground nuclear repository located (hidden in the wilderness) is about 60 years ago in full confrontation with the West in general are not on geological criteria, excluding uranium mining and enrichment plants. But in this case, the initial geological problem fundamentally different from those in justifying the location of the store. Safety as repositories for thousands of years is determined, above all, quality rock masses (mechanical resistance and the ability to isolate the radionuclide’s), and the complex geological, geophysical, hydro - geological and geochemical conditions of their continued existence. Yes, and socio-political situation "in the yard," is quite different. To apply the new time for the former approach a new task - error. Therefore, the first (and possibly the key), the arguments in this matter shall be for an international geology, should be based on the results of the international complex geological projects.

After the lessons of Fukushima in the walls of the National University of Nuclear Engineering Physics Institute formed an important message: the priority of nuclear-think of the Geological symbiosis on an international basis. "The challenge is to establish a plant for the site match between the level of natural risks and the amount of measures needed to ensure proper safety. In this case the assessment should be given on the basis of a single universally accepted methodology (which also has yet to create) a group of qualified experts provided always respecting the principle of internationality of its composition. At the same time, the said method shall include the criteria for an unconditional unsuitable areas (or regions) to construct and operate nuclear power stations "[A. B. Koldobskii. URL: ]. And again: "The construction of nuclear power plants should not be left to the discretion of individual countries. We need some kind of globalization, universalization ... Maybe in some cases even worth thinking about international projects» [URL: news/; .

I should add that the position of internationalization is even more relevant when selecting the site and the creation of a nuclear repository. For example, the Japanese disaster not has been in vain and for the Swedes. The most famous project is the operator of the Swedish nuclear waste management SKB, providing for the construction of an underground vault near the national nuclear plant Oskarshamn and developed three decades, suspended in March 2011. The supervisory authority has announced the convening of an international commission of experts that will test how the waste will be disposed of underground. Apparently, the construction of an underground storage Swedish can be postponed indefinitely [URL: , 14939212, 00. Html]. A project of SKB - the world leader in its "niche" along with Yucca Mountain and the Finnish design - largely conjugated with the Swedish version.

In the Northwest of Russia designers of Ros atom (Min atom) has consistently offered as insulating subsurface of the permafrost of Novaya Zemlya test site limestone and salt deposits of the Republic of Komi. By the way, Uhta works known in radioecology geologist VA Kopeikin, who has serious developments in relation to geochemical barriers of protection against the spread of radio nuclides, heading some of the most difficult years of the Working Party of the USSR Ministry of Geology at Chernobyl. Perhaps, and this resulted in a series of other "drift" Ros atom interest from Novaya Zemlya to the geological structures of the Komi Republic. An alternative to the official sites of Ros atom, and the Far Zelentsov Saida Guba Pechenga is.

Again, think of the geological criteria for selecting sites. Sure, they exist at the national and sectoral level. But what is that such inhumane and comfortable only for individuals criteria that allow you to design a nuclear repository for thousands of years for conditions potentially swamp the world of the New Earth or to build nuclear power plants and storage (Fukushima and others) in the region displays the most destructive forces of nature? Most likely, the most reasonable criteria are the Swedish-Finnish. Necessary in connection with the SAMPO noted the dominance of the principle of non-proliferation of nuclear materials, and the continuity of the relationship is not only a Russian nuclear-religious centers, and international energy projects. In the diagram: the left - the basic concept of the relationship SAMPO, right - the very religious context with the addition of futuristic motifs on the prospects of nuclear-religious and mystic St. Petersburg:

GNEP PECHENGA

Sarov Rechenga S ergiev P osad

S ankt- P eterburg /?\

P ripyat или P echenga \

Ohta-Center

E      I         | /

ARIUS - S - S-S-S - SAMPO (ru, kz, ua)

P A N T /        \

O P E C SAROV “ OPEC SYSTEM ”

I /

E T

R PR

One of the authors of works that contributed to the abolition of the rather high stages of low quality, from a scientific point of view, but the priority projects of the former underground storage of nuclear Yucca Mountain and the New Earth, is a geologist and caver Novosibirsk with Ukrainian "roots" Yurii Dublyansky [Yurii Dublyansky . URL: ]. A unique situation: its general erudition and knowledge in the field of engineering geology and hydrogeology, low-temperature hydrothermal processes, double-isotope studies significantly influenced the formation of solutions of the leading nuclear powers with respect to the location of natural and man-made, with elements of self-organization, facilities, safe to operate according to the standards that have not less than ten thousand years. And indirectly - might expect delayed effects of these factors and events on the future of universal nuclear issues. He also described the style of their own impartial geological studies of such objects by the Russian and American nuclear agencies and funding of independent evaluations. No, unfortunately, like Yurii Dublyansky of objectivity, professionalism and experience of working with foreign partners of people who have expressed interest in the organization and implementation of internationally-based analysis of viability, the replacement vacuum after the close of the said projects, the hypothesis SAMPO (ru, kz, ua). Although it would be the natural science component.

It should be mentioned that in the Pechenga rocks, where possible materialization of one of the options SAMPO (in the form of an underground nuclear power plants or storage), Norwegian and Russian geologists found fossil specimens of ancient, older than 2 billion years, microorganisms (Pechengia melezhiki). Microorganisms that formed on Earth the most important conditions for future biological evolution (development on the basis of oxygen) up to the higher forms. These fossils are preserved to us may probably be considered a sign of long-term stability of the regional geology, the much-needed nuclear facilities. A kind of talisman, amulet. A combination of open Pechengia melezhiki with SAMPO - a symbol of transformation and continuity of life energy.

On the other hand, volcanologists [15] justify the presence in the depths of the Pechenga positive for isolation of nuclear materials of the modern processes of mineral formation. On the "nuclear" potential of this structure pay attention fellow VNIPIET V.A. Perovskii, Murmansk geological industrials (N.I. Bichukov, V.G. Zaitsev, G.S. Melikhova, etc.), specialists of St. Petersburg University A . Sergeev and P. Bogdanov, and director of the Geological Institute of Kola Scientific Center, RAS (F.P. Mitrofanov), Kola super-deep borehole (D.M. Guberman), Yaroslavl, and superdeep drilling expedition, "Nedra" (L. A. Pevsner), as well as the operator of the Swedish nuclear waste management SKB, ISTC, The UNESCO International Geological Correlation Programme [1620]. Not good signs it, given that, according to legend, at one time in the "caves" "Rock of copper" Pechenga created Sampo "Kalevala"? And no clue whether it is to unite efforts in this area, and not only to geologists? At the "reset" on the Pechenga funding from Yucca Mountain, Novaya Zemlya and other similar projects that do not have socio-cultural reasons and not withstanding the test of time. In order to reliably shield the source of electricity (in the case of an underground nuclear power plants), or (in the case of storage), artificial, complex fluids saturated with gases that inevitably arise in the rocks, which has a long high-energy materials.

Interestingly another "relationship" - the symmetry of the contour of the geopolitical demarcation between Russia and its neighbors. The site "Pechenga" is located at the north-western area, "Krasnokamensk" - at the south-eastern border of Russia. On the one hand, respectively, needs, at least, Europe, and with another - Japan, South Korea and China. Besides, did not work apart from the USA, USSR and Japan do without national nuclear disasters? High risk of terrorist initiation of such disasters in several countries of Western Europe, given their militant politics in the South, rich in hydrocarbon regions. Apparently, what happened and the potential "trouble" -another argument for combining efforts and improve surveillance, for example, has the best prerequisites for the realization with the creation of international underground nuclear storage facilities at the junction of the countries in difficult for unauthorized visits to the area. Join the idea of creating such repositories would be useful, for example, Belarus, Lithuania, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.

With respect to the field antropo -social and nuclear sphere we studied the state of affairs in the political and scientific institutions of the UN. The analysis of research methodology of The United Nations University and the Hiroshima Peace Institute. It is advisable to consider further the social and anthropic aspects of nuclear energy on the network principle -in the UNU (leader-coordinator) and other universities in a single "network of networks". On the spiritual and human, ra- tional and irrational methodological basis, corresponding to the fullest realization of the concept and the angle of the total knowledge of man and society - from the standpoint of the principles of civil society. To facilitate the development of adequate scientific objectives of human development (human and natural), technical and policy advice in relation to the need for monitoring of nuclear and related to her areas of civilization and the nuclear public awareness, the impact on their evolution in order to make a nuclear world safe, durable and comfortable. For a successful search for intelligent and practical establishment generating the optimal future antropo -social and nuclear started.

The key publications of the authors on the topic:

• 1.    Komleva Е. V. Nuclear Humanity and F.M. Dostoevsky. URL: http://rulit.org/ read/860/,

• 2.    Komleva E.V. Humanity and nuclear energy: an attempt to socio - cultural understanding. Information and communication technology in the cultural and civilization changes: Materials of the researchers from conferences. (Moscow, October 21. 2010) / M in the culture of the Russian Federation; FSEIHPE "Chelyab. State. Acad. Culture and the Arts ", Comp. TF Berestov, V. Gushul. Chelyabinsk, 2010. P. 50-54.

• 3.    Komleva E.V. Antropo - social and nuclear discourse and spiritual heritage of Dostoevsky / / Madeniet zharshysy. - 2010. - № 5. - P. 27-31.

• 4.    Komleva E.V. anthropocentricity of nuclear energy / Proc. Conference on "Language, culture, society."M., 2009.

• 5.    Komleva E.V. Sotsio - nuclear anthropic principle and pragmatism geo - nuclear / / Minerals of the Urals. - 2008. - № 5. - p. 44-47, Journal of Environmental Russia. - 2009. - № 1. - p. 39-42, Nuclear Society of Kazakhstan. - 2008. - № 1 (12). - 2008. - № 1 (12).

• 6.    Komleva E.V. Development of nuclear-oil situation of the North Europe / / Russian Journal of Ecology. - 2008. - № 8, 9. - P. 41-47, 36-40.

• 7.    Komleva E.V. Reflection Nuclear Oil and Gas North of the situation in Europe: Germany's interests and capabilities as a partner of Russia / / Geophysical Journal. - 2008. - № 2, T.

• 30.    - S. 3-31. Diploma for 1st place in the International Competition of Polar Research on the International Polar Year 2007/2008. (December 2007, St. Petersburg).

• 8.    Komleva E.V. Nuclear Murman // National interests. – 2007. - № 4 (51). – P. 55-59.

• 9.    Komleva E.V. Civilization and nuclear energy: their understanding to the UN for peace and sustainable development management // the philosophy of the science. – 2007. - № 2 (33). – P. 3-45.

• 10.    Komleva E.V. Nuclear waste, gas fields and the security of the North Europe / / ECO: The National Economic Journal. – 2007. - № 3. - P. 104-111.

• 11.    Komleva E.V. Spiritual and pastoral care of the humanitarian Nuclear Oil and Gas of Russia / / the energy policy of Ukraine. – 2006. - № 1.

• 12.    Komleva E.V. Nuclear energy: a measure of humanity / / Herald analysts. -2005. - № 2. – P. 68-85.

• 13.    Komleva E.V. Nuclear power: the social and humanitarian aspects of the international conference "Nuclear power systems for future generations and global stability GLOBAL 2005", 9-14 October 2005 / Proc. Tsukuba, Japan, 2005.

• 14.    Komleva E.V. The social and philosophical problems of nuclear techno sphere in Russia / / Philosophy of Science. – 2004. - № 3 (22). – P. 121-134.

• 15.    Komleva E.V. Nuclear energy through the eyes of liberal arts / / Rosenergoatom . – 2004. -№ 2. - . P.20-23.