On hypothetical features of criminal justice

There is no general list of arguments used by those who oppose the concept of judicial law, unlike the arguments used by those who support it, which have been developed and analysed over time. The development of the relevant scientific discussion requires the clarification, and in this context the article attempts to systematise them with elements of completion. The aim is to determine whether or not there are any systemically significant features of criminal cases that could predetermine the uniqueness of the justice they provide. The determining method of the research is the method of comparative jurisprudence. In addition, general and specific methods (analysis and synthesis, logical, special-legal) are also used.