Possible errors in the diagnosis of intraocular tumors
Автор: Stoyukhina A.S.
Журнал: Вестник Национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н.И. Пирогова @vestnik-pirogov-center
Рубрика: Оригинальные статьи
Статья в выпуске: 4S1 т.19, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Rationale: The article discusses difficulties in the differential diagnosis of intraocular tumors (IOT), particularly in cases of small choroidal melanoma. Despite a substantial number of publications dedicated to the diagnosis of intraocular tumors, difficulties in interpreting imaging methods, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), persist.Objective: to analyze the OCT patterns that have led to diagnostic errors.Methods: We analyzed the OCT results of 15 patients whose diagnosis of «choroidal hemangioma» was revised to «choroidal melanoma» in 11 cases or «progressive nevus» in 4 cases. The mean age at the time of IOT detection was 50.20±13.08 years (range: 35-79 years); the average tumor prominence was 2.22±0.82 mm (range: 1-3.6 mm), and the average diameter was 8.01±2.72 mm (range: 3.11-11.5 mm). A detailed analysis of the specific OCT patterns that led to diagnostic errors was conducted.Results and discussion: The characteristics of the identified OCT patterns that frequently caused diagnostic difficulties were thoroughly examined, such as cystic changes and the «subretinal cleft» phenomenon. Cases in which complex OCT patterns overlapped with both melanoma and hemangioma were also analyzed, reinforcing the need for a multimodal approach to the interpretation of imaging data.
Choroidal melanoma, choroidal hemangioma, choroidal nevus, differential diagnosis, optical coherence tomography, intraretinal cysts, «subretinal cleft», « retinal pigment epithelial trough»
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140307890
IDR: 140307890 | DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2024_19_4_S1_107