On argumentation in legal scientific writings

In empirical research, new facts are clearly established and the argument is based on the demonstration of the process of obtaining a result. The theoretical study deals with entities not included in the sphere of human or social experience, and the argument represents the idea with logically constructed links. The violation of the rules of logic leads to the wrong result. In the field of law, the research is theoretical, but the implementation of the results always has very real consequences that directly affect the life of the State, society and the individual. That is why it is important for a young researcher to start his work from the arguments - both with his own and with others. The article deals with the results of the joint analytical work of the starting investigator and his scientific adviser at the stage of studying the scientific topic - «Legal regulation of constitutional control in Russia». The analysis touched on the issues that had generated debate in the scientific community.