Обработка трехмерных моделей археологических артефактов
Автор: Чистяков Павел Вячеславович, Бочарова Екатерина Николаевна, Колобова Ксения Анатольевна
Журнал: Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология @historyphilology
Рубрика: История и теория науки, новые методы исследований
Статья в выпуске: 7 т.20, 2021 года.
Бесплатный доступ
В предлагаемой статье подробно рассматривается процесс сканирования, постобработки и дальнейших манипуляций с трехмерными моделями, полученными при помощи сканеров структурированного подсвета. Авторами описан алгоритм создания моделей, их позиционирования, упрощения, сохранения в различных форматах и экспорта. Основная последовательность постобработки 3D-моделей включает: обработку групп отсканированных проекций (их чистка и совмещение), создание модели артефакта и обработка / исправление полученных материалов в специальных программах. В результате работы по алгоритму исследователь получает масштабированную модель артефакта, полностью соответствующую оригиналу. Дополнительно освещены возможности последующих исследовательских процедур. Данный алгоритм является универсальным и может быть применен практически к любому сканеру структурированного подсвета и к любым археологическим и этнографическим артефактам.
Трехмерное моделирование, 3D-модели, алгоритм, археология
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147234468
IDR: 147234468 | DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-7-48-61
Список литературы Обработка трехмерных моделей археологических артефактов
- Abouaf J. The Florentine Pietà: Can Visualization Solve the 450-Year-Old Mystery? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1999, vol. 19 (1), p. 6–10. DOI 10.1109/38.736462
- Archer W., Djakovich I., Brenet M., Bourguignon L., Presnyakova D., Schlager S., Soressi M., McPherron Sh. P. Quantifying differences in hominin flaking technologies with 3D shape analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, vol. 150, p. 102912. DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102912
- Archer W., Pop C. M., Rezek Z., Schlager S., Lin S. C., Weiss M., Dogandžić T., Desta D., McPherron Sh. P. A geometric morphometric relationship predicts stone flake shape and size variability. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 1991–2003, 2018, vol. 10. DOI 10.1007/s12520-017-0517-2
- Arnold D., Kaminsky J. 3D scanning and presentation of ethnographic collections – potentials and challenges. Journal of Museum Ethnography, 2014, vol. 27, p. 78–97.
- Arriaza M. C., Yravedra J., Domínguez-Rodrigo M., Mate-González M. A., García Vargas E., Palomeque-González J. F., Aramendi J., González-Aguilera D., Baquedano E. On applications of microphotogrammetry and geometric morphometrics to studies of tooth mark morphology: the modern Olduvai carnivore site (Tanzania). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2017, vol. 488, p. 103–112. DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.036
- Beraldin J. A., Blais F., Cournoyer L., Rioux M., El-Hakim S. H., Rodella R., Bernier F., Harrison N. Digital 3D Imaging System for Rapid Response on Remote Sites. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Ottawa, Canada). Ottawa, 1999, p. 34–43.
- Bretzke K., Conard N. J. Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts. The Journal of Archaeological Science, 2012, vol. 39, p. 3741–3749. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.039
- Brunoa F., Brunoa S., De Sensib G., Luchi M.-L., Mancusoc S., Muzzupappaa M. From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2010, vol. 11, iss. 1, p. 42–49. DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.006
- Chistyakov P. V., Kovalev V. S., Kolobova K. A., Shalagina A. V., Krivoshapkin A. I. 3D modelirovanie arkheologicheskikh artefaktov pri pomoshchi skanerov strukturirovannogo podsveta [3D Modeling of Archaeological Artifacts by Structured Light Scanner]. Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovanii [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research], 2019, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 35–39. (in Russ.) DOI 10.14258/tpai(2019)3(27).-07
- De Reu J., De Smedt P., Herremans D., Van Meirvenne M., Laloo P., De Clercq W. On introducing an image-based 3D reconstruction method in archaeological excavation practice. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, vol. 41, p. 251–262. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.020
- Grosman L., Ovadia A., Bogdanovsky A. Neolithic masks in a digital world. In: Face to Face. The Oldest Masks in the World. Jerusalem, The Israel Museum, 2014, p. 54–59.
- Grosman L., Smikt O., Smilansky U. On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts. The Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, vol. 35 (12), p. 3101–3110. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.011
- Harush O., Glauber N., Zora A., Grosman L. On quantifying and visualizing the potter’s personal style. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2019, vol. 108. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2019.104973
- Harush O., Roux V., Karasik A., Grosman L. Social signatures in standardized ceramic production – A 3-D approach to ethnographic data. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2020, vol. 60. DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101208
- Karasik A., Smilansky U. 3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: practice and theory. The Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, vol. 35, p. 1148–1168. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.008
- Kolobova K. A., Zotkina L. V., Markin S. V., Vasilev S. K., Chistyakov P. V., Bocharova E. N., Kharevich A. V. Kompleksnoe izuchenie personal’nogo ukrasheniya iz reztsa surka v rannegolotsenovom komplekse peshchery Kaminnaya (Rossiiskii Altai) [Complex study of a personal ornament made on a marmot incisor from the Early Holocene complex of Kaminnaya Cave (Russian Altai)]. Stratum plus: Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya [Stratum plus: Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology], 2021, no. 1, p. 319–335. (in Russ.)
- Kolobova K. A., Fedorchenko A. Y., Basova N. V., Postnov A. V., Kovalev V. S., Chistyakov P. V., Molodin V. I. The Use of 3D-Modeling for Reconstructing the Appearance and Function of Non-Utilitarian Items (the Case of Anthropomorphic Figurines from Tourist-2). Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2019, no. 4 (47), p. 66–76. DOI 10.17746/1563-0102.2019.47.4.066-076
- Kovarovic K., Aiello L. C., Cardini A., Lockwood C. A. Discriminant function analyses in archaeology: Are classification rates too good to be true? Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, vol. 38, iss. 11, p. 3006–3018. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2011.06.028
- Li H., Lei L., Li D., Lotter M. G., Kuman K. Characterizing the shape of Large Cutting Tools from the Baise Basin (South China) using a 3D geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2021, vol. 36. DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102820
- Magnani M., Guttorm A., Magnani N. Three-dimensional, community-based heritage management of indigenous museum collections: Archaeological ethnography, revitalization and repatriation at the Sámi Museum Siida. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2018, vol. 31, p. 162–169. DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2017.12.001
- Morales J. I., Lorenzo C., Vergès J. M. Measuring Retouch Intensity in Lithic Tools: A New Proposal Using 3D Scan Data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2015. vol. 22, p. 543–55. DOI 10.1007/s10816-013-9189-0
- Porter S., Roussel M., Soressi М. A Comparison of Châtelperronian and Protoaurignacian core technology using data derived from 3D models. Journal of computer applications in archaeology, 2016, no. 2 (1), p. 41–55. DOI 10.5334/jcaa.17
- Shalagina A. V., Kharevich V. M., Maury S., Baumann M., Krivoshapkin A. I., Kolobova K. A. Rekonstruktsiya tekhnologicheskikh tsepochek proizvodstva bifasial’nykh orudii v industrii Chagyrskoi peshchery [Reconstruction of the bifacial technological sequence in Chagyrskaya Cave assemblage]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian Historical Research], 2020, vol. 3, p. 130–151. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17223/2312461X/29/9
- Valletta F., Smilanski U., Goring-Morris N. A., Grosman L. On measuring the mean cutting-edge angle of lithic tools based on 3-D models – a case study from the Southern Levantine Epipaleolithic. Archaeological Anthropological Sciences, 2020. vol. 12. DOI 10.1007/s12520-019-00954-w
- Vavulin M. V. Tekhnologii trekhmernoi otsifrovki krupnykh avtonomnykh arkheologicheskikh ob”ektov [3D digitizing of large separate artifacts]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2016, iss. 407, p. 55–60. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17223/15617793/407/9
- Vavulin M. V., Zaitseva O. V., Pushkarev A. A. Metodika i praktika 3D skanirovaniya raznotipnykh arkheologicheskikh artefaktov [3D Scanning Techniques and Practices used for Different Types of Archaeological Artifacts]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian Historical Research], 2014, no. 4, p. 21–37. (in Russ.)
- Vavulin M. V., Zaitseva O. V., Pushkarev A. A. Trekhmernoe skanirovanie i modelirovanie korabel’nykh detalei kocha [3D scanning and modeling of ship parts of the koch]. In: Virtual’naya arkheologiya (effektivnost’ metodov) [Virtual Archaeology (the effectiveness of methods)]. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference. 1–3 June 2015. State Hermitage Museum. St. Petersburg, 2015, p. 234–239. (in Russ.)
- Zaitseva O. V. “3D revolyutsiya” v arkheologicheskoi fiksatsii v rossiiskoi perspektive [“3D revolution” in archaeological recording in Russian perspective]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian Historical Research], 2014, no. 4, p. 10–20. (in Russ.)
- Zotkina L. V., Kovalev V. S., Shalagina A. V. Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy primeneniya trekhmernoi vizualizatsii kak instrumenta analiza v arkheologii [Opportunities and Prospects for the Use of Three-Dimensional Visualization as an Analysis Tool in Archaeology]. Nauchnaya vizualizatsiya [Scientific Visualization], 2018, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 172–190. (in Russ.) DOI 10.26583/sv.10.5.11
Статья научная
