Opinion dynamics on prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections against the background of COVID-19 pandemic

Автор: Vladimir I. Timoshilov, Aleksey V. Breusov, Kristina V. Polyakova, Sergey V. Pisklakov

Журнал: Saratov Medical Journal @sarmj

Статья в выпуске: 2 Vol.3, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Objective: analysis of opinion dynamics in young people on prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) against the background of COVID-19 pandemic vs. the pre-pandemic period. Materials and Methods. Our research was based on a comparison of data from a sociological survey of 400 respondents 16-21 years of age in 2021 and an analysis of 838 questionnaires from participants of the same age in a similar study in 2017. The research employed the methodology of sociological questionnaire. The original questionnaire was used, consisting of 46 questions, combined into five thematic blocks: assessment of the STI problem relevance, likelihood of infection risk, readiness to undergo preventive screening examinations, preferred directions for seeking medical help in the event of STI, and consent to examination and treatment in conjunction with a sexual partner. By gender, the distribution of study subjects was as follows: 51% of women (n=427) in 2017 vs. 52% (n=208) in 2021; 49% of men (n=411) in 2017 vs. 48% (n=192) in 2021. In processing and presenting the data, extensive indicators were used, compared with the assessment of the significance of differences sensu Student’s t-test. Results. In 2021, we observed an increase in the interest of young people in undergoing screening examinations (79.5% vs. 63% in 2017, p=0.006) and seeking medical help (93.5% vs. 89.5%, p=0.007); on the other hand, in 2021, young people were more likely to conceal their health status from a partner (32.2% vs. 8.3%, p=0.003). Conclusion. The study revealed a change in the opinions of respondents regarding STIs during the pandemic, specifically, an increase in understanding the need for regular examinations and seeking medical help in the event of STI symptoms, but at the same time, there was a reduced responsibility for the sexual health of their partner.

Еще

Sexually transmitted infections, COVID-19 pandemic, young people

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149146151

IDR: 149146151   |   DOI: 10.15275/sarmj.2022.0204

Текст научной статьи Opinion dynamics on prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections against the background of COVID-19 pandemic

Prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is built mainly as work with young people. This is due to the fact that individuals under the age of 35 years old dominate in the age structure of newly detected cases of this category of diseases, and most of the manageable risk factors for the spread of STIs are relevant for this age group [1-3]. Extensive examination of published data and expert evaluation of risk factors and their properties revealed that modifiable factors of public opinion and social wellbeing impose crucial impact on the sexual lifestyle, which determines the epidemiological processes of STIs [4–6].

Against the background of COVID-19 pandemic in 20202021, there have been significant changes in state policy, public life and social wellbeing of the population, which a number of authors have already described as unprecedented [7]. Restrictions imposed on mass events and the transfer of educational institutions to a remote mode of operation have significantly reduced the potential of traditional health education of young people in organized groups [8]. Against the background of the inevitable focus on coronavirus topics in the work of the official media, the role of informal Internet community in shaping public opinion on general health issues has increased [9]. Meanwhile, different authors gave opposite conclusions about the changes that occurred in the attitude of the population to public health issues and prerequisites for their formation. Among positive changes, there was an increase in the perception of diseases as a public rather than a personal problem [10]; an increasing attention to personal health and its value [11]; an increase of interest in medical information, respect and trust in doctors [12]; rallying of a certain part of the population around government structures, and the intensification of volunteer activities in the field of health care [13, 14]. The development of such attitudes was always considered the goal of preventing all diseases.

At the same time, other studies focused on the development of reverse trends, designated as risk factors that reduced the effectiveness of preventive work. It was noted that people’s attention to their health was manifested mainly

2022. Volume 3. Issue 2 (June). Article CID e0204

in relation to the symptoms of coronavirus [15]. Under the influence of large-scale restrictive measures and their consequences for the economy and social sphere, manifestations of dissatisfaction with official state institutions, including the healthcare system, are currently growing, and the variety of alternative information sources in social networks activates medical dissidence [9, 16, 17].

The coexistence of opposing changes in public opinion has been noted not only in Russia, but in other countries as well, including the results of studies of past smaller-scale epidemics and other social upheavals [16, 18, 19].

Список литературы Opinion dynamics on prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections against the background of COVID-19 pandemic

  • Krasnoselskikh TV, Shaboltas AV. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and blood-borne infections. HIV Infection and Immunodeficiency Disorders 2018; 10 (4): 100-12. [In Rus.] https://doi.org/10.22328/2077-9828-2018-10-4-100-112
  • Gagauz O, P ahomii I. Youth health and health-risk behavior. Economie si Sociologie 2017; (4): 94-105.
  • Timoshilov VI. Sexual Infections and HIV in the Russian Federation and Chernozem Regions in 2014-2019: Incidence, Problems and Ways of Developing Monitoring. Kursk 2021; 96 p. [In Russ.]
  • Konina MA, Kholmogorova AB, Sorokova MG. The phenomenon of unrestricted sexual behavior in contemporary society: Pathological cultural trends of culture or pathology of personality? Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy 2014; (2): 88-118. [In Russ.]
  • Westerlund M, Santtila P, Johansson A, et al. Does unrestricted sociosexual behavior have a shared genetic basis with sexual coercion? Psychology, Crime & Law 2010; (16): 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802621925
  • Timoshilov VI, Lastovetskiy AG. Risk factors for contracting and spreading sexually transmitted infections: Analytical review and expert assessment. Bulletin of New Medical Technologies, eEdition 2018; (2): 25-32. [In Russ.]
  • Digest of research in clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy 2020; 28 (2): 190-6. [In Russ.]
  • Serafimovich IV, Baranova YuG, Ivanova EA. Features of the socio-psychological barriers of teachers towards remote format of work in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. In: Social and Professional Development of Personality in an Era of Great Challenges: Interdisciplinary Discourse. Proceedings of Russian National Conference with International Participation. Yaroslavl 2021; р. 124-30. [In Russ.]
  • Ostapenko AG, Shvartskopf EA, Ostapenko AA, et al. Infodemic and social networks: Induced risks and chances. Information and Security 2020; 23 (2): 235-44). [In Russ.]
  • Tkhostov ASh, Rasskazova EI. Psychological content of anxiety and prevention in an Infodemic Situation: Protection from coronavirus or the vicious circle of anxiety. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy 2020; 28 (2): 70-89. [In Russ.]
  • Koltsova IV, Dolganina VV. The impact of the pandemic on the occurrence of anxiety among students of a pedagogical university. The World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology 2020; (4). URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/29PSMN420.pdf (10 Oct 2021).
  • Zhuravlev AL, Kitova DA. Attitude of Russian residents to information about the coronavirus pandemic (case study of Internet search engine users). Psychological Journal 2020; (4): 5-18. [In Russ.]
  • Paklina EA. Organization of volunteer activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture 2020; 4 (45): 130-5. [In Russ.]
  • Mamedova AO, Bykova PV, Sysoev AA, et al. Volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic. StudNet 2020; 3 (7): 216-21. [In Russ.]
  • Gut YuN, Tkachenko NS, Doronina NN, et al. Dynamics of the impact of self-isolation on the emotional state of students and university teachers. Prospects for Science and Education 2021; 2 (50): 340-52. [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.2.23.
  • Micah AE, Cogswell IE, Cunningham B, et al. Tracking development assistance for health and for COVID-19: A review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 204 countries and territories, 1990-2050. The Lancet 2021; 398 (10308): 1317-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01258-7
  • Kubrak TA, Latynov VV. Opportunities and limitations of information and psychological impact in the situation of the coronavirus pandemic. Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology 2020; 2 (18): 84-114. [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.003
  • Jang K, Paek YM. When information from public health officials in untrustworthy: The use of online news, interpersonal networks, and social media during the MERS outbreak in South Korea. Health Communication 2019; 34 (9): 991-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1449552.
  • Cornwall W. Social scientists scramble to study pandemic, in real time. Science 2020; (368): Iss. 6487.
  • Narkevich AN, Vinogradov KA. Methods of determining the minimum required sample size in medical research. Social Aspects of Public Health 2019; 65 (6): 10. [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2019-65-6-10
Еще
Статья научная