Features of coping resources individual and team athletes sports

Topicality The article deals with the analysis of coping resources of athletes of individual and team sports. The purpose of the study is to search for psychological resources of successful coping behavior, which allows an athlete to effectively overcome stress, in individual and team sports. Research methods: 1. Methods of diagnosing athletes of individual sports: methods of diagnosing strategies for overcoming stressful situations "SACS" (S. Hobboll), resilience (S. Muddy, adaptation of D.A. Leontiev), style of self-regulation of behavior (SSPM) (V.I. Morosanova),, tolerance-intolerance to uncertainty (T.V. Kornilova). 2. Methods of diagnostics of athletes of team sports: methods of diagnosing coping strategies during the crisis of N. Agazade and methods aimed at studying the level of emotional and social intelligence, psy-chosocial maturity, empathy, adaptation, communicative and organizational inclinations. 3. Methods of mathematical statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient). The results of the study and their discussion. In individual sports, the greatest contribution to the development of constructive coping strategies and the reduction of destructive ones is made by the components of resilience, self-regulation and tolerance to uncertainty. In team sports, emotional intelligence, psychosocial maturity and adaptation components, i.e. parameters that provide flexible interaction with people, are the most resourceful. In team sports, the resource of the parameters is distributed differentially, which can be seen in the absence of anti-resources. Conclusion The study revealed fundamentally different approaches to the process of overcoming stress in groups of athletes of individual and team sports. In individual sports, resilient, risky and independent athletes in a situation of stress can show impulsivity and asociality, since the consequences of their actions are reflected mainly only on themselves. Athletes in individual sports use prosocial coping, which is similar to team coping. At the same time, in prosocial coping, society supports the athlete, but does not solve the problem with him, unlike team coping, where all participants in the process are interested in overcoming difficulties.