Peculiarities of Financing Road Activities in the Arctic Region: the Experience of the Murmansk Oblast

Автор: Serova N.A.

Журнал: Arctic and North @arctic-and-north

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 45, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article presents the results of a study of the peculiarities of financing the road economy of the Murmansk Oblast — the Arctic region, the development of transport, including road, infrastructure of which acquires particular importance in the light of the implementation of national interests and priority directions of Russian state policy in the Arctic. In the course of work, the author considered the dynamics of spending funds from the Road Fund of the Murmansk Oblast for 2012–2020. It has been determined that the existing volume of financing of the regional road infrastructure does not allow the region to fully implement the tasks of developing road infrastructure and improving the quality of highways (primarily local ones). It is concluded that additional funds are needed to finance the road infrastructure of the Arctic regions, including through the use of public-private partnership mechanisms. The results of the study can be used in the formation of a policy in the field of road facilities in the Murmansk Oblast, as well as in further research on the financial support of road activities and the functioning of road funds.

Еще

Murmansk Oblast, arctic region, road facility, road fund, highway

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148323172

IDR: 148323172   |   DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.45.36

Текст научной статьи Peculiarities of Financing Road Activities in the Arctic Region: the Experience of the Murmansk Oblast

Financing of road activities is one of the most capacious and significant investments of national importance, since a developed road infrastructure, along with other infrastructure sectors, plays a key role in sustainable economic development [1, Deng T.; 2, Ng C.P. et al.], formation of a favorable investment climate [3, Martinkus B., Lukasevicius K.] and improving the quality of life [4, Berman N.].

Road funds are one of the most common mechanisms for financing road activities in the world [5, Kirk R.S., Mallet W.J.; 6, Kosov M.E.; 7, Dung N. et al.]. In Russia, this mechanism began to be used in the early 1990s at the federal and regional levels 1. Sources for the targeted off-budget road funds formation were the following: tax on economic entities as users of highways at a rate of 2.5% of their revenues (enterprises engaged in the production of agricultural products were exempted from payment), tax on vehicles purchase, tax on vehicle owners, and tax on the sale of fuels and lubricants. Subsequently, the land tax, excise tax on petroleum products, excise tax on car sales, etc. were also transferred to road funds.

In 2001, taxes on fuels and lubricants sale and vehicles purchase were abolished 2, which resulted in ceasing of the Federal Road Fund financing and its liquidation. Two years later, the tax on road users, which was the main source of territorial road funds, was abolished as well, and, as a result, their operation was also terminated.

The law “On road funds of the Russian Federation” was abolished in 2005. 3 After that, financing of the road sector was carried out directly from the budget, without the allocation of separate revenue sources [8, Golovanova N.V.; 9, Protasenia S.I.]. The result of the road funds liquidation was a chronic underfunding of the transport industry and, as a consequence, a slowdown in the development of road facilities [10, Korobitsyn T.G.; 11, Konvisarova E.V., Uksumenko A.A.]. Thus, if in 1992–2000 Russia built about 6.1 thousand km of paved roads annually, then in 2001–2009 the average increase was only about 2.85 thousand km per year [12, Afanasyev R.S.].

The revival of the road fund system was initiated in 2011, when Article 179.4 4 was introduced into the Budget Code, defining road funds as “part of the budget funds to be used for the financial support of road activities in relation to public highways, as well as capital repairs and repairs of yard territories of apartment buildings in residential districts” 5. After the Federal Road Fund was established on January 1, 2012, regional road funds were created in each constituent territory of the Russian Federation, and since 2013, municipal road funds were created as well. Thus, the system of financing road activities has been restored.

The purpose of this study was to identify the main trends and features of funding road activities in the Murmansk Oblast — the Arctic region, where the development of transport, including road infrastructure, is of particular importance in the light of the implementation of Russia's strategic priorities to create a unified Arctic transport system and integrate it into the country's transport system. [13, Leksin V.N., Profiryev B.N.; 14, Kikkas K., Romashkina E.; 15,

Characteristics of the road network in the Murmansk Oblast

Numerous studies [21, Kondratov N.A.; 22, Biev A.A.; 23, Ulchenko M.V., Bashmakova E.P.; 24, Matveev A.S. and etc.; 25, Kozmenko S.Yu., Ulchenko M.V.], including the author’s ones [19; 26–27], repeatedly emphasized that the territory of the Russian Arctic, occupying about half of the country's area, lags several times behind the average Russian indicator by the level of availability of motor roads.

However, in comparison with other Arctic territories 7, the road network of the Murmansk Oblast can be characterized as sufficiently developed (Table 1). The region is crossed by about 1.17 thousand public roads with a length of 3585.1 km (9.9% of the total length of the AZRF roads), more than 95.2% of which are paved. Of these, 561.2 km are of the federal highway R-21 “Kola” (St. Petersburg — Petrozavodsk — Murmansk), about 2 thousand km — of regional roads, and 971.8 km of local roads. In 2021, two regional roads to multidirectional automobile border crossing points (MABCPs) on the border with Finland — Lotta highway with a length of 228 km (Kola — Verkhnetulomskiy — Lotta checkpoint) and Salla highway with a length of 166 km (Kandalaksha — Alakurtti — Salla checkpoint) will be transferred to federal ownership.

Level of the road network development in Russia's Arctic territories, 2020.

Table 1

Public roads

incl. paved surfaces

Share in

AZRF, %

Provision ratio 8

Share in

AZRF, %

Provision ratio 9

AZRF, including:

-

0.318

-

0.125

Republic of Karelia (Arctic part)

7.4

0.976

16.9

0.869

Komi Republic (Arctic part)

8.2

0.671

5.5

0.175

Arkhangelsk Oblast (Arctic part)

14.4

0.408

19.3

0.214

Nenets Autonomous Okrug

1.1

0.137

2.0

0.101

Murmansk Oblast

9.9

0.347

24.0

0.331

Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug

7.7

0.135

16.6

0.115

Krasnoyarsk Krai (Arctic part)

8.0

0.180

3.7

0.032

Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) (Arctic part)

37.3

1.291

6.0

0.081

Chukotka Autonomous Okrug

6.0

0.358

6.0

0.142

Despite the fact that the density of highways in the Murmansk Oblast is almost three times higher than the same indicator for the whole AZRF (24.7 km per 1000 km2 of the region territory versus 7.3 km per 1000 km2 of the AZRF territory), only about 20 % of the area can be considered transported (Fig. 1):

  • •    along the federal highway R-21 “Kola”, which crosses the oblast from south to north to the Borisoglebsk checkpoint on the border with Norway (Pechenga highway);

  •    along roadways to settlements in the central and western regions of the oblast (the cities of Apatity, Kirovsk, Monchegorsk, Kovdor, etc.), as well as to the Lotta checkpoint and Salla checkpoint.

Fig. 1. Scheme of public roads in the Murmansk Oblast.

The situation in the eastern part of the Murmansk Oblast is completely different — due to the lack of highways, most settlements are connected with the regional center and the centers of municipal districts only by air transport.

Peculiarities of financing road activities in the Murmansk Oblast

In the Murmansk Oblast, the Road Fund (RF) was established in 2012 10. Over the eight years of its existence, more than 17.9 billion rubles were allocated to the road infrastructure of the region, the overwhelming part (74.4%) of which was directed to the maintenance and repair of roads (both regional and local) and only 3.9 % for construction and reconstruction. However, while in 2012 the share of funds allocated for the construction of new and reconstruction of existing roads in the region was 15.2%, by 2019 it decreased to 0.4%. Only in 2020, after the start of construction of a 5-kilometre section of a new four-lane road near Murmansk, the share of funds for this expenditure item increased to 6.1% (Table 2).

Table 2

Dynamics of expenditure of Murmansk Oblast Road Fund for construction (reconstruction) and maintenance and repair of roads 11

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Funds from the Road Fund used, mln rub

1477.1

1752.7

1864.1

1523.2

2215.3

2374.9

1970.2

3157.1

1646.6

of which aimed at:

Construction (reconstruction) of roads, mln rub

224.3

9.7

61.9

2.1

188.1

77.4

27.4

12.9

100.0

share in the total amount of funds, %

15.2

0.6

3.3

0.1

8.5

3.3

1.4

0.4

6.1

Repair and maintenance of roads, mln rub

1249.9

1438.8

1644.7

1385.7

1938.3

2116.7

1661.6

2512.3

1244.5

share in the total amount of funds, %

84.6

82.1

88.2

91.0

87.5

89.1

84.3

79.6

75.6

Another noteworthy trend is the reduction in the funds for the maintenance and repair of highways in the region. This mainly affected local roads, as due to the redistribution of funding (in particular, in 2014, a new item appeared in the structure of spending — expenditures on road maintenance facilities) less funds were allocated for subsidies to municipal budgets (Table 3).

Structure of Murmansk Oblast Road Fund expenditure, % 12

Table 3

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Construction, maintenance and repair of regional roads

81.1

72.2

79.4

85.8

83.2

78.1

79.8

71.5

69.7

Subsidies to municipal budgets

18.7

23.0

15.8

9.6

12.8

16.3

5.9

18.2

16.4

Activities of road facilities

-

-

4.6

4.5

3.6

3.9

13.8

9.7

13.8

Other areas of spending

0.2

4.9

0.2

0.2

0.4

1.8

0.4

0.6

0.2

How the reduction in financing of road activities of the Murmansk Oblast municipalities has affected the quality of local roads is clearly illustrated by the dynamics of the share of roads that do not meet the regulatory requirements in the total length of roads in the region (Fig. 2). Thus, if in 2010 96.2% of local roads in the region met the standards (it is one of the highest indicators not only among the regions of the Russian Arctic, but also in the country as a whole), by 2018 their share decreased by 25.3, accounting for 70.9%.

78,2

2010      2011       2012      2013      2014      2015      2016      2017      2018      2019

----•    Regional or inter-municipal roads .......•...... Local roads

Fig. 2 The share of roads in the Murmansk Oblast that do not meet regulatory requirements, in the total length of highways.

The situation began to change only in 2019, when the national project “Safe and Quality Roads” 13 was launched in the region, one of the main tasks of which is to bring at least 50% of regional highways and 85% of the road network of urban agglomerations to a standard 2024. For these purposes, more than 6.6 billion rubles will be allocated to the budget of the Murmansk Oblast over the entire period of the project implementation. In particular, in 2019–2020, these funds have already been used to repair more than 20 sections of regional roads and 27 objects of the street and road network of Murmansk (part of the Murmansk agglomeration). In 2021, 5 sections of regional roads, more than 30 objects of the urban road network and 3 bridges will be repaired.

Conclusion

The analysis has shown that the current amount of funding for road activities in the Murmansk Oblast does not allow the region to fully implement the tasks of developing road infrastructure and improving the quality of roads (primarily, local ones) in the region. For the regions of the Russian Arctic, which includes the Murmansk Oblast, the problem of underfunding of road activities is exacerbated by the influence of the “Arctic specifics” (huge hard-to-reach areas, extreme climate, etc.), which limits the possibilities of building new roads and causes difficulties in maintaining the roads in a high quality condition. This implies that additional funding is needed to finance road activities in the Arctic regions, including public-private partnership mechanisms.

Acknowledgments and funding

This article was prepared within the framework of the research work under the state assignment of the Federal Research Center of the KSC RAS (project No. 0226-2019-0027).

Список литературы Peculiarities of Financing Road Activities in the Arctic Region: the Experience of the Murmansk Oblast

  • Deng T. Impacts of Transport Infrastructure on Productivity and Economic Growth: Recent Advances and Research Challenges. Transport Reviews, 2013, no. 33 (6), pp. 686–699. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.851745
  • Ng C.P., Law T.H., Jakarni F.M., Kulanthayan S. Road Infrastructure Development and Economic Growth. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 512, p. 012045. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/512/1/012045
  • Martinkus B., Lukasevicius K. Investment Environment of Lithuanian Resorts: Researching National and Local Factors in the Palanga Case. Transformations in Business & Economics, 2008, no. 7 (2), pp. 67–83.
  • Berman N. Vliyanie transportnoy infrastruktury na ustoychivoe razvitie: tendentsii i problem [Influence of Transport Infrastructure on Sustainable Development: Trends and Challenges]. International Journal of Advanced Studies, 2020, no. 10 (2), pp. 7–14. DOI: 10.12731/2227-930X-2020-2-7-14
  • Kirk R.S., Mallet W.J. Funding and Financing Highways and Public Transportation. Washington, DC, Congressional Research Service, 2020, 29 p.
  • Kosov M.E. Analiz rezul'tatov deyatel'nosti i otsenka effektivnosti dorozhnykh fondov [Results Analysis and Effectiveness Evaluation of Road Funds]. Vestnik Universiteta, 2019, no. 10, pp. 112–117. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2019-10-112-117
  • Dung N., Hung B., Phuong N., Tuyet P. Completing Capital Mobilization Plan for Road Maintenance in Viet Nam. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 869, p. 022016. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/2/022016
  • Golovanova N.V. Regional'nye dorozhnye fondy: nuzhno li zakreplyat' dokhody na federal'nom urovne? [Regional Road Funds: Should Their Revenue Sources Be Determined at the Federal Level?]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2016, no. 6, pp. 81–89.
  • Protasenia S.I. Genezis dorozhnykh fondov v Rossii [The Genesis of Road Funds in Russia]. Finansy i biznes [Finance and Business], 2017, no. 3, pp. 43–54.
  • Korobitsyn T.G. Osobennosti i problemy finansirovaniya avtodorozhnogo stroitel'stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Features and Problems of Financing Road Construction in the Russian Federation]. Molodoy Uchenyy, 2011, no. 4, vol. 1, pp. 158–161.
  • Konvisarova E.V., Uksumenko A.A. Problemy finansirovaniya avtodorozhnogo khozyaystva v kontekste natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii [The Problems of Road Network Funding in the Context of Russia’s National Security]. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' [National Security / Nota Bene], 2016, no. 2, pp. 276–285. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2016.2.18180
  • Afanasyev R.S. Finansovoe obespechenie dorozhnykh fondov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Financial Support of Road Funds in the Russian Federation]. Problemy sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya [Problems of Modern Science and Education], 2016, no. 32 (74), pp. 51–54.
  • Leksin V.N., Profiryev B.N. Socio-Economic Priorities for the Sustainable Development of Russian Arctic Macro-Region. Economy of Region, 2017, no. 4, pp. 985–1004. DOI: 10.17059/2017-4-2
  • Kikkas K., Romashkina E. Potential Opportunities for the Arctic Transport Space. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, vol. 180, p. 012016. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/180/1/012016
  • Korchak E.A., Serova N.A. Polyarnye vzglyady na Zapolyar'e: arkticheskaya politika Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran [Polar Views on the Arctic: Arctic Policies of Russia and Circumpolar Countries]. Kontury global'nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law], 2019, no. 12 (5), pp. 145–159. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-145-159
  • Gagiev N.N., Goncharenko L.P., Sybachin S.A., Shestakova A.A. National Projects in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], 2020, no. 41, pp. 113–129. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.11
  • Smirnova O.O., Lipina S.A., Kudryashova E.V., Kreydenko T.F., Bogdanova Yu.N. Creation of Development Zones in the Arctic: Methodology and Practice. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], 2016, no. 25, pp. 148–157. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.25.148
  • Samarina V.P., Samarin A.V., Skufina T.P., Baranov S.V. Social and Economic Development of Russia’s Northern Regions: Lessons, Trends and Decisions. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 2019, Vol. lvii, pр. 388–398. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.39
  • Serova N.A., Serova V.A. Transportnaya infrastruktura rossiyskoy Arktiki: spetsifika funktsionirovaniya i perspektivy razvitiya [Transport Infrastructure of the Russian Arctic: Specifics Features and Development Prospects]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 2021, no. 2 (185), pp. 142–151. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-185-142-151
  • Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie severo-arkticheskikh territoriy Rossii [Socio-Economic Development of the North Arctic Territories of Russia]. Ed. by T.P. Skufyina, E.E. Emelyanova. Apatity, KSC RAS, 2019. 119 p.
  • Kondratov N.A. Osobennosti razvitiya transportnoy infrastruktury v Arkticheskoy zone Rossii [Development of Transport Infrastructure in the Arctic Zone of Russia]. Geograficheskiy vestnik [Geographical Bulletin], 2017, no. 4 (43), pp. 68–80. DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2017-4-68-80
  • Biev A.A. Osnovnye napravleniya formirovaniya seti transportnoy i energeticheskoy infrastruktury v arkticheskikh regionakh Rossii [The Main Areas of Focus of Forming a Network of Transportation and Energy Infrastructure in the Arctic Regions of Russia]. Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki [Regional Problems of Transforming the Economy], 2017, no. 11 (85), pp. 66–72.
  • Ulchenko M.V., Bashmakova E.P. Problemy razvitiya transportnoy infrastruktury v regionakh Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Problems of Development of Transport Infrastructure in the Regions of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy i resheniya [Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions], 2018, no. 7 (11), pp. 45–52.
  • Matveev A.S., Matveev D.O., Matveev O.A. Razvitie transportnoy infrastruktury Arktiki — vazhneyshee uslovie privlecheniya investitsiy dlya ispol'zovaniya resursnoy bazy makroregiona [The Development of Transport Infrastructure of the Arctic is an Important Condition for Attracting Investments to Use the Resource Base of the Macroregion]. Colloquium-journal, 2019, no. 15 (39), pp. 88–93. DOI: 10.24411/2520-6990-2019-10481
  • Kozmenko S.Yu., Ulchenko M.V. Development of Transport Infrastructure in the Regions of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation from the Position Provisions of National Security. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 302, p. 012123. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012123
  • Serova N.A., Serova V.A. Critical Tendencies of the Transport Infrastructure Development in the Russian Arctic. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], 2019, no. 36, pp. 42–56. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2019.36.42
  • Serova N.A., Serova V.A. Transportnaya infrastruktura rossiyskoy Arktiki: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Transport Infrastructure of the Russian Arctic: Current State and Development Prospects]. Konkurentosposobnost' v global'nom mire [Competitiveness in the Global World: Economics, Science, Technologies], 2017, no. 12 (59), pp. 1269–1272.
Еще
Статья научная