Predictive and analytical capabilities of macroeconomic models in conditions of crisis economic development (using the example of the QUMMIR model)

Автор: Shirov Aleksandr A., Brusentseva Asiya R., Savchishina Kseniya E., Kaminova Sofya V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article deals with the use of econometric macromodels for solving applied problems to substantiate economic policy. The questions of the applicability of econometric methods for modeling economic processes are considered. The requirements for the key qualities of complex macroeconomic models are being formed. Emphasis is placed on the fact that it is econometric modeling based on large amounts of data that contributes to a deep analysis of the causal relationships existing in the economy. As an illustration, we use the description of the quarterly macroeconomic model QUMMIR, which has been used for a decade and a half at the Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences for medium-term forecasting. It is shown that in conditions of increasing economic uncertainty, the importance of analyzing scenarios of socio-economic development and substantiating economic policy measures aimed at tapping the internal potential of economic development increases. We argue that the use of advanced predictive and analytical tools can significantly improve the quality of forecast estimates and the validity of decisions made on their basis. The structure of the model is described in detail with an emphasis on budget and financial blocks. The final part of the article provides an example of using a quarterly macroeconomic model to analyze decisions in the field of fiscal and monetary policy. Calculations demonstrate a positive impact on the dynamics of GDP on the part of budget system expenditures in the absence of a significant effect on the growth of inflation. In terms of monetary policy, calculations demonstrate its relative neutrality in relation to economic dynamics, as well as the exhaustion of the positive impact on the economy in the current conditions due to the weakening of the ruble exchange rate.

Еще

Macroeconomic models, econometric modeling, economic policy, fiscal policy, monetary policy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147239136

IDR: 147239136   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.6.84.2

Список литературы Predictive and analytical capabilities of macroeconomic models in conditions of crisis economic development (using the example of the QUMMIR model)

  • Almon C. (2012). Iskusstvo ekonomicheskogo modelirovaniya [The Craft of Economic Modeling]. Translated from English. Moscow: MAKS Press.
  • Almon C. (2016). Intersectoral INFORMUM models: Origin, development and overcoming of problems. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2(155), 3–15 (in Russian).
  • Bardazzi R., Ghezzi L. (2021). Large-scale multinational shocks and international trade: A non-zero-sum game. Economic Systems Research, 34(2), 1–27.
  • DeJong D.N. (2011). Structural Macroeconometrics. Second edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Drobyshevskii S.M., Kadochnikov P.A. (2003). Econometric analysis of the 1998 financial crisis. In: Ekonomika perekhodnogo perioda: sb. izbr. rabot 1999–2002 gg. [The Economy of the Transition Period: Collection of Selected Works 1999–2002]. Moscow: Delo (in Russian).
  • Dubinin S.K. (2015). Financial crisis. 2014–2015. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=Journal of the New Economic Association, 2(26), 219–225 (in Russian).
  • Hausman D.M. (2011). Mistakes about preferences in the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(1), 3–25.
  • Klepach A.N (2022). Macroeconomics in the context of a hybrid war. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii=The VEO of Russia Today, 235(3), 63–78 (in Russian).
  • Klepach A.N. (2020). Russian economy: The Coronavirus’ shock and the recovery prospects. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii=The VEO of Russia Today, 222(2), 72–87. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-222-2-72-87 (in Russian).
  • Klistorin V.I. (2011). About the accuracy and reliability of forecasts. EKO=ECO, 12(450), 40–47 (in Russian).
  • Lucas R. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In: Brunner K., Meltzer A. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1. New York: American Elsevier.
  • Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R., Sidorenko M.Yu., Khabriev B.R. (2022). Vychislimye modeli obshchego ravnovesiya [Computable General Equilibrium Models]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyi akademicheskii universitet gumanitarnykh nauk.
  • Savchishina K.E. (2008). Forecasting of indicators of the fiscal sphere within the framework of the quarterly macroeconomic model QUMMIR. Nauchnye Trudy, 225–241 (in Russian).
  • Shokhin A.N., Akindinova N.V., Astrov V.Yu. et al. (2021). Macroeconomic effects of the pandemic and prospects for economic recovery (proceeding of the roundtable discussion at the 22th April international academic conference on economic and social development). Voprosy ekonomiki, 7, 5–30. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-5-30 (in Russian).
  • Shoven J.B., Whalley J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, XXII, 1007–1051.
  • Shoven J.B., Whalley J. (1992). Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge University Press.
  • Tinbergen J., Boss H. (1967). Matematicheskie modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta [Mathematical Models of Economic Growth]. Moscow: Progress.
  • Voskoboynikov I.B. et al. (2021). Recovery experiences of the Russian economy: The patterns of the post-shock growth after 1998 and 2008 and future prospects. Voprosy ekonomiki, 4, 5–31 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная