Conciliation procedures in the system of ways of alternative settlement of civil law disputes

Persons who have decided to resolve the conflict with the help of conciliation procedures may face a choice, which of the possible ways of reconciliation is best to resort to. The content of this work is a comparative characteristic of such types of conciliation procedures as negotiations, mediation and judicial reconciliation. The analysis was carried out on the basis of the criteria of the scope of the procedure, the grounds and conditions for its initiation, the subject composition, the procedure and timing of the conciliation procedure. The issues of the legal nature of the concluded agreements, the legal status of the mediator and the judicial conciliator are considered. Some problems in terms of mediation and judicial reconciliation have also been identified.