Prosperous old age: from scientific theories to the fundamentals of its programming

Автор: Belekhova G.V., Natsun L.N., Soloveva T.S.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In most countries, due to changes in the age structure of their population caused by the global process of demographic aging, discussions have been held for many decades about the essence of the aging process itself and the mechanisms of adaptation of society to the ongoing changes. The multidimensional nature and complexity of aging, in which biological, age-related, socio-cultural, economic and psychophysiological transformations are intertwined, are repeatedly emphasized. A universal understanding of aging cannot be developed, but each country needs its own aging concept in order to provide for a full-fledged and decent life of older adults. The aim of the study is to generalize conceptual approaches to understanding aging and systematize its factors; this will allow us to conceptualize prosperous old age as a basis for effective public policy in the field of aging. Theoretical basis of the study includes foreign and Russian works on demographic aging. We elaborate on the conceptual framework used in the research and on the relations between key categories; generalize relevant aging concepts and highlight a theoretical basis for our approach; systematize factors contributing to the process of successful aging; provide our own view of the term “prosperous old age” and the conceptual framework of governmental policy on its basis. Scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that we elaborate on the concept of prosperous old age and substantiate ways to formalize it in modern institutions and tools of social policy. The results obtained can provide a theoretical basis and contribute to the further development of Russian research on successful aging.

Еще

Aging, old age, prosperous old age, successful aging, concept, successful aging factors, programming old age

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147243855

IDR: 147243855   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.2.92.12

Список литературы Prosperous old age: from scientific theories to the fundamentals of its programming

  • Aleksandrova N.Kh. (2000). Peculiarities of human subjectivity at late stages of ontogenesis. Razvitie lichnosti, 3–4, 101–125 (in Russian).
  • Anishchenko E.B., Trankovskaya L.V., Vazhenina A.A., Tarasenko G.A. (2022). The state of health as a factor affecting the work activity of working elderly people. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya=Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology, 62(5), 311–321. DOI: 10.31089/1026-9428-2022-62-5-311-321 (in Russian).
  • Antonov A.I., Nazarova I.B., Karpova V.M., Lyalikova S.V. (2023). Threshold of old age: Objective signs and subjective perspective. Narodonaselenie=Population, 26(3), 131–143. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.11 (in Russian).
  • Baltes M.M., Carstensen L.L. (1996). The process of successful aging. Aging and Society, 16, 397−422.
  • Baltes P.B., Baltes M.M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes P.B., Baltes M.M. (Eds.). Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barsukov V.N. (2019). From the demographic dividend to population aging: World trends in the system-wide transition. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(4), 167–182 (in Russian).
  • Borisov G.I. (2019). Personal factors of achievement of psychological well-being by elderly people. Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh, 1(53), 53–62 (in Russian).
  • Boudiny K. (2013). “Active aging”: From empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Aging and Society, 33(6), 1077–1098. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X1200030X
  • Boudiny K. (2020a). “Active aging”: From empty rhetoric to effective policy tool (article summary). In: Evseeva Ya.V., Yadova M.A. (Eds.). Uspeshnoe starenie: sotsiologicheskie i sotsiogerontologicheskie kontseptsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Seriya: Teoriya i istoriya sotsiologii [Successful Aging: Concepts in Sociology and Social Gerontology]. Moscow: INION RAN (in Russian).
  • Bowling A. (1993). The concepts of successful and positive aging. Family Practice, 10(4), 449–453. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/10.4.449
  • Chausov N.Yu., Chausov N.N. (2020). On the issue of strategies for active longevity of older people. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii vestnik=Russian Economic Bulletin, 3(4), 195–199 (in Russian).
  • Chereneva E.A., Safonova L.M., Potylitsina V.Yu., Cherenev D.V. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical support of elderly people as a factor of successful aging. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P. Astaf’eva (Vestnik KGPU), 4(58), 54–62. DOI: 10.25146/1995-0861-2021-58-4-303 (in Russian).
  • Curb J.D., Guralnik J.M., LaCroix A.Z. et al. (1990). Effective aging meeting the challenge of growing older. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38(7), 827–828. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb01478.x
  • Dobrokhleb V.G. (2022). Demographic aging in Russia and new social reality. Narodonaselenie=Population, 25(2), 66–76. DOI: 10.19181/population.2022.25.2.6 (in Russian).
  • Evseeva Ya.V. (2011). Concepts of successful aging in social gerontology. Sotsiologicheskii ezhegodnik, 2011, 281–292 (in Russian).
  • Evseeva Ya.V. (2020b). The theory of successful aging: Contemporary studies: Introduction to the thematic section. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 11: Sotsiologiya, 1, 6–13. DOI: 10.31249/rsoc/2020.01.01 (in Russian).
  • Freund A.M. (2008). Successful aging as management of resources: The role of selection, optimization, and compensation. Research in Human Development, 5(2), 94–10. DOI: 10.1080/15427600802034827
  • Freund A.M., Baltes P.B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642−662.
  • Galkin K.A. (2023). Features of delayed aging in the post-Covid world. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 9(2). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2023.2.38.2. Available at: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/29641 (in Russian).
  • Gibbons H.M. (2016). Compulsory youthfulness: Intersections of ableism and ageism in “successful aging” discourses. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 12(2&3), 70–88. DOI:10.1080/13569783.2017.1326806
  • Golovei L., Strizhitskaya O., Kriulina A. (2014). Personality positive functioning in elderly people: A complex approach. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya=Psychological Studies, 7(36). DOI: 10.54359/ps.v7i36.607 (in Russian).
  • Golubeva E.Yu., Soloviev A.G. (2023). WHO healthy aging decade 2020–2030: Policy conception review in gerontology context. Ekologiya cheloveka=Human Ecology, 30(7), 499–508. DOI: 10.17816/humeco568625 (in Russian).
  • Goroshko N.V., Patsala S.V. (2021). Silver economy as a new trend of world development in the context of global population aging. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki, 2, 198–218. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.2.15 (in Russian).
  • Greve W., Staudinger U.M. (2015). Resilience in later adulthood and old age: Resources and potentials for successful aging. Developmental Psychopathology: Volume Three: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation, 796–840. DOI: 10.1002/9780470939406.ch21
  • Grigoryeva I.A., Kelasev V.N. (2017). Archaic stereotypes and modern approaches for understanding of aging. Uspekhi gerontologii=Advances in Gerontology, 2, 243–247 (in Russian).
  • Grigoryeva I.A., Parfenova O.A., Galkin K.A. (2023). Conference “Extended adulthood / delayed aging in a time of post-Covid and uncertainty”. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 26(1), 256–260. DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2023.26.1.10 (in Russian).
  • Havighurst R.J. (1963). Successful aging. Processes of Aging: Social and Psychological Perspectives, 1, 299–320.
  • Kahana E., Kahana B. (1996). Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding well-being through proactive adaptation. In: Bengtson V. (Ed.). Adulthood and Aging: Research on Continuities and Discontinuities. New York: Springer.
  • Kalachikova O.N., Barsukov V.N., Korolenko A.V., Shulepov E.B. (2016). Determinants of active longevity: Results of a survey of Vologda long-livers. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 5, 76–94. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2016.5.47.4 (in Russian).
  • Kasyanova T.I., Voronina L.I., Zaitseva E.V. (2023). Active longevity: Opportunities, life attitudes and social practices of elderly. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 9(2). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2023.2.38.3 (in Russian).
  • Kerschner H., Pegues J.A. (1998). Productive aging: A quality of life agenda. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(12), 1445–1448. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00327
  • Kislitsyna O.A. (2016). Izmerenie kachestva zhizni/blagopoluchiya: mezhdunarodnyi opyt [Measuring Quality of Life/Well-Being: International Experience]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.
  • Korolenko A.V. (2022). Active aging in the life practices of the Vologda Oblast population. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 8(1). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.1.33.2 (in Russian).
  • Korolenko A.V., Barsukov V.N. (2017). Health status as a factor of labor activity of the retirement-age population. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya, 4, 643–657 (in Russian).
  • Kozlova O.A., Sekitski-Pavlenko O.O. (2022). Theoretical framework for the socio-economic research on age and aging in the context of contemporary demographic trends. Alter Economics, 19(3), 442–463. DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2022.19-3.3 (in Russian).
  • Liang J., Luo B. (2012). Toward a discourse shift in social gerontology: From successful aging to harmonious aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 26(3), 327–334. DOI: 10.1016/j, jaging.2012.03.001
  • Minami U., Nishi M., Fukaya T. et al. (2015). Effects of the change in working status on the health of older people in Japan. PloS One, 10(12), e0144069. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0144069
  • Moody H.R. (2005). From successful aging to conscious aging. In: Wykle M., Whitehouse P., Morris D. (Eds.). Successful Aging through the Life Span: Intergenerational Issues in Health. New York: Springer.
  • Natsun L.N. (2022). Assessment of relationship between population’s life attitudes and ideas about active longevity. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 8(2). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.2.34.2 (in Russian).
  • Nizamova A. (2020). Normativity and the aging self: “Active longevity” media discourse in contemporary Russia. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 12(2), 45–67. DOI: 10.25285/2078–1938–2020–12–2–45–67
  • Notestein F.W. (1945). Population. The Long View. Food for the World. University of Chicago Press.
  • Rowe J.W., Kahn R.L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful. Science, 237(4811), 143–149.
  • Rubinstein R.L., de Medeiros K. (2015). “Successful aging,” gerontological theory, and neoliberalism: A qualitative critique. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 34–42. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu080
  • Ryazantsev S.V., Miryazov T.R. (2021). Demographic well-being: Theoretical approaches to definition and methodology of assessment. DEMIS. Demograficheskie issledovaniya=DEMIS. Demographic Research, 1(4), 5–19. DOI: 10.19181/demis.2021.1.4.1 (in Russian).
  • Ryff C.D., Singer B.H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39.
  • Sadykova N.T. (2017). Old age as a new stage of humanity. Vestnik Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2(34), 53–56 (in Russian).
  • Sergeeva O.V. (2012). Sociology of aging and ageism: A review of the contribution of western approaches. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial’nye tekhnologii, 2(17), 74–79 (in Russian).
  • Sidorenko A., Zaidi A. (2013). Active aging in CIS countries: Semantics, challenges, and responses. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 1, 1–17. DOI:10.1155/2013/261819
  • Strizhitskaya O.Yu., Petrash M.D. (2022). Construction of productive aging: Biological, psychological and environmental factors. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya=Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 30(1), 8–28. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2022300102 (in Russian).
  • Vidyasova L.A. (2023). Active and delayed aging in the assessments of the elderly (according to a pilot study of St. Petersburg). Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 21(3), 485–502. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-3-485 (in Russian).
  • Vidyasova L.A., Grigor’eva I.A., Krivoshapkina A.S. (2024). Career expectations of the elderly in Russia: Based on the analysis of the resumes’ database from the Rostrud portal “Work of Russia”. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal ,1, 26–47. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2024.1.2430 (in Russian).
  • Vishnevskii A.G. (1976). Demograficheskaya revolyutsiya [Demographic Revolution]. Moscow: Statistika.
Еще
Статья научная