Protectionism in Russia: new trends in the context of the import of institutions

Автор: Grinberg Ruslan S., Komolov Oleg O.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article examines the institutional aspect of state regulation of foreign economic activity in Russia. Theoretical basis of the research is the concept of “educational protectionism” by F. List, which involves the cultivation of “young industries” under the shelter of protective customs tariffs until they become competitive in domestic and foreign markets; as well as the theory of “delinking” by S. Amin, who considers protectionism as a method for the countries, which are on the periphery of the world economy, to exit the relations of unequal exchange with industrialized countries: national economic policy should be aimed at meeting the needs of domestic development, rather than promoting international competitiveness (food security, full employment, minimum wage, etc.). Such measures were a stable element of the socio-economic model of the USSR and acted as a source of capital accumulation for the development of industry and the military-industrial complex. We come to the conclusion that the mindless borrowing (transplantation) of institutions of free trade and protectionism in Russia in the 1990s, which was not accompanied by the formulation and implementation of state strategic plans for the development of the Russian economy, led to the formation of a “mutant” economic model. On the one hand, the complete abandonment of the policy of state monopoly on foreign trade led to the flooding of the domestic market with imported goods and, as a consequence, massive ruin of domestic manufacturing enterprises. On the other hand, the purpose of the fragmentary application of protectionist policy instruments was not so much to support national producers as to create a comfortable environment for the distribution of state property among a narrow group of people close to the authorities, as well as favoring monopoly capital in a number of sectors of the domestic economy.

Еще

Protectionism, institutions, free-trade, Russia, agriculture

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147237722

IDR: 147237722   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.3

Список литературы Protectionism in Russia: new trends in the context of the import of institutions

  • Afanasyev V.S., Medvedeva Y.M., Abdulov R.E. (2015). Niels Bohr’s principle of complementarities in political economy. European Research Studies Journal, 18(4), 275–292.
  • Aksenova A.O. (2016). Compensation for workers in the USA – can this experience be used in Russia? Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauka=Current Problems of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 4. Available at: https://publikacia.net/archive/2016/4/2/1 (accessed: September 12, 2021; in Russian).
  • Amin S. (1990). Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World. London: ZED Books.
  • Amin S. (1996). The challenge of globalization. Review of International Political Economy, 3(2), 216–259.
  • Apokin A. (2011). Towards new policy incentives for fixed capital investment and technological upgrades in Russia. Voprosy ekonomiki, 6, 12–21 (in Russian).
  • Dzarasov R.S., Novozhenov D.V. (2009). Krupnyi biznes i nakoplenie kapitala v sovremennoi Rossii [Big Business and Capital Accumulation in Modern Russia]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Librokom.
  • Dzarasov R.S. (2010). Critical realism and Russian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(6), 1041–1056.
  • Epshtein D.B. (2017). The growth rate of food import prices and the growth of Russian agriculture. In: Nikonovskie chteniya [Nikonov Readings].
  • Evenett S., Vines D. (2012). Crisis-era protectionism and the multilateral governance of trade: An assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(2), 195–210.
  • Feenstra R. (1992). How costly is protectionism? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3), 159–178.
  • Grinberg R.S., Komolov O.O. (2020). Import of institutions: Theoretical aspect and practical experience. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: Fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(3), 17–27. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.2 (in Russian).
  • Gruzinov V.P. (1979). The USSR’s Management of Foreign Trade. White Plains: M. E. Sharpe Inc.
  • Lenin V.I. (1974). The immediate tasks of Soviet government. In: V.I. Lenin. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works of V.I. Lenin]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury.
  • List F. (2017). Natsional’naya sistema politicheskoi ekonomii [The National System of Political Economy]. Moscow: Sotsium.
  • Maslov G.A. (2019). Technological and economic development and the return of protectionism. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki=Problems of Modern Economics, 1, 43–47 (in Russian).
  • Obolenskii V.P. (2018). From legitimate protectionism to trade wars? Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya=World Eсonomy and International Relations, 62(9), 18–25 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2008). Current state of the economic reforms theory. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2, 6–45 (in Russian).
  • Sukharev O.S. (2021). Functional approach in decision-making: Dysfunction and efficiency of rules and systems. Upravlenets=The Manager, 12(1), 2–17. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-1-1 (in Russian).
  • Suleimanov S.V. (2003). Participation of foreign nationals in privatization in the Russian Federation. Zakonodatel’stvo=Legislation, 8, 9–17 (in Russian).
  • Tolkachev S.A., Brzhezinskii V.G. (2018). Instruments of state support of the industry through the prism of the institutional approach. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta=Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University, 1(31), 97–106 (in Russian).
  • Tsedilin L.I. (2014). Protektsionizm v rossiiskoi ekonomicheskoi politike: institutsional’nyi istoricheskii opyt [Protectionism in Russian Economic Policy: Institutional Historical Experience]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.
  • Yakub A.V. (2018). The monopoly of foreign trade policy of the RSFSR in 1917–1922 and counter-trends in the organization of international philately. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: istoricheskie nauki=Herald of Omsk University. Series “Historical Studies”, 1, 167–171 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная