Public administration quality: assessment criteria in comparative territorial frames

Автор: Kalashnikov Konstantin Nikolaevich

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical issues

Статья в выпуске: 5 (53) т.10, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The purpose of the article is to generalize, systematize and develop a number of key theories and concepts of public administration efficiency and quality. The author classifies and criticizes the conceptual framework of the study and evaluates the efficiency and quality of public administration. It has been found out that the traditional “functionalist” approaches based on assessment of the achieved socially significant results or economic growth are important, especially in the context of using the program-target method of administration, yet insufficient. The novelty of the research is that in contrast to the authors proposing assessments based on trivial indicators of regions' socio-economic development, the author substantiates the importance of using the complex approach in assessing the effectiveness/ quality of public administration, which helps consider not only the “effectiveness”, but also the quality of procedural mechanisms of public administration (autonomy of the executive power in choosing mechanisms of the implementation of identified policy goals; level of transparency and objectivity of mechanisms of selection and job promotion, professionalization of government employees)...

Еще

Public administration efficiency and quality, criteria, weberian state, theory of impartial political institutions, concept of embedded autonomy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147223987

IDR: 147223987   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.5.53.4

Список литературы Public administration quality: assessment criteria in comparative territorial frames

  • Berlin I. Filosofiya svobody. Evropa .Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2001. 448 p..
  • Ionin L.G. (Ed.). Weber M. Khozyaistvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchei sotsiologii . In 4 volumes. Translated from German. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016..
  • Voroshilov N.V. Effektivnost' munitsipal'nogo upravleniya: sushchnost' i podkhody k otsenke . Problemy razvitiya territorii , 2015, no. 3, pp. 143-159.
  • Gaidar E.T. Gibel' imperii. Uroki dlya sovremennoi Rossii . Moscow: Corpus, 2013. 592 p..
  • Ilyin V.A., Povarova A.I. Problemy effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Tendentsii rynochnykh transformatsii. Krizis byudzhetnoi sistemy. Rol' chastnogo kapitala. Strategiya-2020: problemy realizatsii . 188 s..
  • Kachestvo i uspeshnost' gosudarstvennykh politik i upravleniya. Seriya "Politicheskaya aksiologiya" . Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert, 2012. 496 p.
  • Klistorin V.V. Federativnye otnosheniya, regional'naya politika i problema deformatsii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva Rossii . Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya , 2013, no. 3 (79), pp. 79-95.
  • Simon G., Smithburg D., Thompson V. Menedzhment v organizatsiyakh . Moscow: RAGS "Ekonomika", 1995. 342 p..
  • Foucault M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki. Tsikl lektsii . Informatsionno-analiticheskii portal "Gumanitarnye tekhnologii" . Available at: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/doc/6709..
  • Fukuyama F. Sil'noe gosudarstvo: Upravlenie i mirovoi poryadok v XXI veke . Moscow: Ast: ACT Moskva: Khranitel'. 2006. 542 p..
  • Effektivnost' gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v otsenkakh naseleniya. Monitoring sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo polozheniya munitsipal'nykh raionov Vologodskoi oblasti v 2000-2013 gg. . Vologda: ISERT RAN, 2014..
  • A Conversation with Francis Fukuyama. John B. Hurford Memorial Lecture: Council on foreign relations. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/event/conversation-francis-fukuyama
  • Bluntschli J.K. The Theory of the State. Kitchener, 2000. 491 p.
  • Dahlberg S., Holmberg S., Rothstein B., Khomenko A., Svensson R. Kachestvo pravitel'stva Osnovnoi Nabor dannykh Universitet Geteborga: Kachestvo pravitel'stvennogo Instituta , 2016. Available at: http://www.qog.pol.gu.se DOI: 10.18157/QoGBasJan16
  • Evans P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press, 1995. 325 p.
  • Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305-360.
  • Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3106, 2004.
  • Varraich A. Sorruption: an umbrella concept. QoG Working Paper Series 2014:05.
  • Fukuyama F. The Strange Absence of the State in Political Science. The American Interest, 2012. Available at: https://www.the-american-interest.com/2012/10/02/the-strange-absence-of-the-state-in-political-science/
  • Fukuyama F. Democracy and corruption. The American interest, 2012. Available at: https://www.the-american-interest.com/2012/10/05/democracy-and-corruption/
  • Fukuyama F. What Is Governance? CGD Working Paper 314. Washington, DC? 2013. Center for Global Development. Available at: http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/1426906
  • Rothstein B., Teorell J. What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Political Institutions. QOG Working paper series, 2005:6.
  • Weber M. Politics as a Vocation. The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis: Hackett Company, 2004. 32 p.
  • What is Good Governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Available at: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
  • Woolcock M., Pritchett L. Solutions When the Solution is the Problem: Arraying the Disarray in Development. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development Paper 10, 2002.
  • Wilson W. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 1887, no. 2(2), pp. 197-222. Available at: http://www.commentary.com/admin_thoughts_1887.pdf
  • World Bank. 1997. World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5980
  • Zakaria F. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 1997, pp. 22-43.
Еще
Статья научная