Development of low on responsibility for the organization of armed rebellion

The purpose of the study is to study the development of legislation for crimes related to armed encroachment on the foundations of the state system and the security of the state. The study of historical aspects of criminal responsibility for armed rebellion and terrorist crimes allows us to analyze the mistakes that existed in the criminal law of the past years in order to develop a model for improving the current Criminal Code and bring the norms on responsibility for armed forms of seizure of power into a single system that would allow them to be most rationally built to achieve the goals and objectives that the criminal law faces. Based on the analysis, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to improve the studied group of criminal law norms. All the changes that were made to the criminal law were unsystematic, based on the events taking place in the state and the political situation of a particular time, since some norms have changed repeatedly, and some remain unchanged since the adoption of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in 1996. Such haphazardness has caused collisions of criminal law norms that do not contribute to the uniformity of judicial practice in the application of the norms of responsibility for these crimes. The author comes to the conclusion that based on the experience of the past years, it is necessary to create a unified system of norms providing for responsibility for armed forms of seizure of power and terrorist activities. In particular, there is a need to combine in one chapter all crimes that indicate terrorist activity, which would allow applying a unified approach to all elements of the system of terrorist crimes and, thereby, strengthen the criminal legal impact on this system as a whole