Reaction of municipal budgets to state regulation measures: assessment methodology

Reaction of municipal budgets to state regulation measures: assessment methodology

Автор: Leonov S.N.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The geographical scale of the Russian Federation dictates the need for differentiated spatial implementation of economic strategy and tactics. The municipal component of these processes is particularly important, since a significant part of regional resources is formed at the local level, causing multiplicative effects in the structures operating in the territory. In the conditions of sanctions pressure and lack of funds to finance the development of municipalities, it is necessary to take into account the reaction and extent of activity of local budgets in relation to government incentive measures. It is necessary to understand which municipalities’ budgets react more actively to the managing effects of state policy; this will effectively stimulate the development of municipalities in the conditions of financial constraints of state bodies. The paper proposes and verifies a methodological approach to the comparative assessment of the activity of municipal budgets in terms of measures of state financial support for municipal development. The approach is based on the maximin criterion and is implemented on the example of municipalities included in the Far Eastern Federal District, which is Russia’s largest one. The information base comprises data of the Federal Treasury on the state of municipalities’ consolidated budgets for 11 Far Eastern constituent entities of the Russian Federation for 2011, 2015 and 2020. We analyze the consolidated budgets of all 164 municipal districts and 66 urban okrugs and estimate their comparative activity in relation to the measures of state financial stimulation of municipal development. We reveal high polarization of the activity of local budgets regarding state regulation measures. We show that the budgets of urban okrugs react more actively to government measures than the budgets of municipal districts. The budgets of urban districts formed a group of local budgets with the most active response to state regulation measures. Nevertheless, the transition of the Magadan and Sakhalin oblasts to single-level local government systems consisting only of urban okrugs by 2020 did not contribute to increasing the activity of the budgets of urban okrugs in these regions in relation to state regulation measures in comparison with other municipalities of the Far Eastern Federal District. The proposed mechanism makes it possible to provide territorial administration bodies with methodological tools for in-depth analysis and comparative assessment of the extent of activity of municipal budgets in relation to state regulation measures.

Еще

Municipalities, local budget, stimulation of municipal development

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241615

IDR: 147241615   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.9

Список литературы Reaction of municipal budgets to state regulation measures: assessment methodology

  • Barabash E.S., Leonov S.N. (2023). Financial and structural prospects of local government reform in Russia. Izvestiya Baikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 33(1), 46–56 (in Russian).
  • Barabash E.S., Leonov S.N., Primachenko L.S. (2014). Estimation of the effectiveness of state regional policy of municipalities. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika=Herald of Omsk University, 2, 128–136 (in Russian).
  • Belov A.V. (2012). Effektiven li tsentralizm? Optimizatsiya byudzhetnykh otnoshenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Is Centralism Effective? Optimization of Budgetary Relations in the Russian Federation]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
  • Dollery B., Byrnes J., Crase L. (2007). Is bigger better? Local government amalgamation and the South Australian rising to the challenge inquiry. Economic Analysis & Policy, 37(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(07)50001-9
  • Ermakova E.A., Bolyakina O.V. (2012). Approaches to the determination of the financial independence of the local budgets of Russia. Finansy i kredit=Finance and Credit, 12(492), 2–8 (in Russian).
  • Fratesi U., Perucca G. (2014). Territorial capital and the effectiveness of cohesion policies: An assessment for CEE regions. Investigaciones Regionales, 29, 165–191. Available at: https://old.aecr.org/images/ImatgesArticles/2014/10/08Fratesi.pdf
  • Kornai J. (1986). The soft budget constraint. KYKLOS, 39(1), 3–30. Available at: http://www.kornai-janos.hu/Kornai1986%20The%20Soft%20budget%20Constraint%20-%20Kyklos.pdf
  • Korotina N.Yu. (2014) Methodology for analyzing the financial state of municipal budgets. Bukhgalterskii uchet v byudzhetnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh, 17(353), 17–27 (in Russian).
  • Kotov A.V. (2020). Assessing the efficiency of regional policy tools. Ekonomika regiona, 16(2), 352–362 (in Russian).
  • Kotov A.V. (2022). Efficiency assessment of preferential treatment at the municipal level. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 10(1).
  • Kulakovsky E.S. (2019). Indicators of sustainable socio-economic development in local authorities’ decision-making at the municipal level (case of Voronezh oblast). Regional'nye issledovaniya, 2(64), 25–35 (in Russian).
  • Kuznetsova O.V. (2006). Intergovernmental relations: Parallels between Russia and Germany. Kazanskii federalist, 3, 56–67 (in Russian).
  • Kuznetsova O.V., Babkin R.A. (2021). Typology of municipalities to monitor their socio-economic development. Federalizm=Federalism, 26(4), 35–53 (in Russian).
  • Lavrov A., Sutherland D., Litwack J. (2001). Reform of fiscal federalist relations in Russia: “Federalism creating a market”. Voprosy ekonomiki, 4 (in Russian).
  • Leonov S.N. (2020). Preferential regimes of established local growth points and its impact on the economy of the Far East. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(3), 28–45 (in Russian).
  • Leonov S.N. (2021). Financial results of the local self-government reform. Experience of the regions of the Far East. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 14(6), 160–175. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.6.78.9 (in Russian).
  • Leonov S.N. (2023). Finansovye i strukturnye aspekty reformy mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossii: monografiya [Financial and Structural Aspects of the Reform of Local Self-Government in Russia: Monograph]. Khabarovsk: Institut ekonomicheskikh issledovanii Dal'nevostochnogo otdeleniya RAN.
  • Levina V.V. (2017). Regulation of regional development using financial instruments: Problems and prospects. Upravlenets=The Manager, 3(67), 18–24 (in Russian).
  • Makarova S.N. (2012). Methodology of financial analysis and evaluation of program expenditures of the budget of public legal education. Audit i finansovyi analiz, 6, 123–133 (in Russian).
  • Mikheeva N.N., Ananyeva R.I. (2011). Tools of regional policy: Assessing the efficiency of their application. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya, 3, 39–57 (in Russian).
  • Minakir P.A., Prokapalo O.M. (2017). Centralization and autonomation as the drivers of socio-economic development of the Russian Far East. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 10(6), 24–41 (in Russian).
  • Minakir P.A., Sergienko V.I. (2011). Sintez nauchno-tekhnicheskikh i ekonomicheskikh prognozov: Tikhookeanskaya Rossiya – 2050 [Synthesis of Scientific, Technological and Economic Forecasts: Pacific Russia – 2050]. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
  • Pechenskaya-Polishchuk M.A. (2020). Instruments and principles of reallocating budgetary resources in the region. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(2), 71–88. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.2.68.5 (in Russian).
  • Pevcin P. (2017а). The evidence on the existence of economies of scale in local government units. In: The Economies of Balkan and Eastern Europe Countries in the Changed World (EBEEC): Conference Proceedings. Available at: https://knepublishing.com/index.php/Kne-Social/article/view/673
  • Pevcin P. (2017b). Municipal mergers: Theoretical considerations, practical evidence and potential implications. In: Future World by 2050: 8th International Scientific Conference (Croatia, Pula, 1–3 June 2017). Available at: https://fet.unipu.hr/_download/repository/Future_World_2050_-_Conference_Proceedings.pdf
  • Pinskaya M.R., Ziganshina L.A. (2015). Balance of regional and local budgets: Issues and solutions. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki=Innovative Development of Economy, 6(30), 90–98 (in Russian).
  • Prokapalo O.M. (2003). Regional'naya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya dinamika: Dal'nii Vostok i Zabaikal'e [Regional Socio-Economic Dynamics: The Far East and Transbaikal Region]. Khabarovsk: Institut ekonomicheskikh issledovanii Dal'nevostochnogo otdeleniya RAN.
  • Puzanov A.S. (2021). Potential for the development of municipalities. Byudzhet, 10(226), 56–59 (in Russian).
  • Selyavina E.A. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of public financial institutions for spatial development: The experience of Russia. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 1, 91–108 (in Russian).
  • Shirokov A.N., Yurkova S.N. (2020). Problems of local self-government development at the present stage: The view of the municipal community. Munitsipal'naya akademiya=Municipal Academy, 4, 77–79 (in Russian).
  • Solomko M.N. (2019). Budget balance: Approaches to definition and estimation. Vestnik Universiteta, 3, 143–150. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2019-3-143-150 (in Russian).
  • Sukharev O.S. (2015). Budgetary costs, efficiency and priorities of economic development. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal, 1(23), 17–28 (in Russian).
  • Temple M. (1994). Regional Economics. London: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Yashina N.I., Emel'yanova O.V. (2008). A technique for estimating the financial condition of consolidated budgets of the Russian Federation regions. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo=Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 5, 154–166 (in Russian).
  • Yashina N.I., Yasenev A.V., Yasenev V.N. (2012). Improvement of methods for assessing fiscal sustainability of municipalities and entities of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo=Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 1-1, 244–253 (in Russian).
  • Yashina N.I., Yashin S.N., Bogomolov S.V., Malova N.G. (2020). Methodological tools for monitoring the creditworthiness of regions and municipalities. Nauchnoe obozrenie: teoriya i praktika, 10(2)(70), 269–282. DOI: 10.35679/2226-0226-2020-10-2-269-282 (in Russian).
  • Zaitseva Yu.S. (2007). Gorodskoi barometr: sistema monitoringa sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya munitsipal'nykh obrazovanii [Urban Barometer: A System for Monitoring Socio-Economic Development in Municipalities]. Moscow: Fond “Institut ekonomiki goroda”.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©