Regional competition for confidence: features of formation

Автор: Vazhenina Irina Svyatoslavovna, Vazhenin Sergei Grigorevich, Sukhikh Vasilii Valentinovich

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social development

Статья в выпуске: 4 (46) т.9, 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The increase in economic independence of the regions inevitably leads to an increase in the quality requirements of the regional economic policy. The key to successful regional policy, both during its development and implementation, is the understanding of the necessity of gaining confidence (at all levels), and the inevitable participation in the competition for confidence. The importance of confidence in the region is determined by its value as a competitive advantage in the struggle for partners, resources and tourists, and attracting investments. In today's environment the focus of governments, regions and companies on long-term cooperation is clearly expressed, which is impossible without a high level of confidence between partners. Therefore, the most important competitive advantages of territories are intangible assets such as an attractive image and a good reputation, which builds up confidence of the population and partners. The higher the confidence in the region is, the broader is the range of potential partners, the larger is the planning horizon of long-term concerted action, the better are the chances of acquiring investment, the higher is the level of competitive immunity of the territories...

Еще

Competition, region, confidence, cooperation, image, reputation, brand

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147223863

IDR: 147223863   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2016.4.46.4

Список литературы Regional competition for confidence: features of formation

  • Primakov E.M. Vazhneishaya problema ekonomiki. Vystuplenie na zasedanii “Merkurii -kluba” . Rossiiskaya gazeta , 2015, no. 112 (May 25), p. 10..
  • Vazhenina I., Vazhenin S. Gorizonty territorial'noi konkurentsii v sovremennom ekonomicheskom prostranstve . Obshchestvo i ekonomika , 2011, no. 3, pp. 67-85..
  • Porter M. Konkurentsiya. Obnovlennoe i rasshirennoe izdanie . Moscow: OOO “I.D. Vil'yams”, 2010. 592 p..
  • Vazhenina I.S. Imidzh, brend i reputatsiya kak konkurentnye preimushchestva regiona . Upravlenets , 2010, no. 5-6, pp. 4-10.
  • Khamel G., Prakhalad K.K. Konkuriruya za budushchee. Sozdanie rynkov zavtrashnego dnya . Moscow: ZAO “Olimp-Biznes”, 2002. 288 p..
  • Hodgson G. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya i instituty: Manifest sovremennoi institutsional'noi ekonomicheskoi teorii . Moscow: Delo, 2003. 464 p..
  • Fukuyama F. Doverie . Moscow: AST; Ermak, 2004, 735 pp..
  • Mil'ner B.Z. Teoriya organizatsii . Moscow: INFRA-M, 2004. 648 p..
  • Granovetter M. Ekonomicheskie instituty kak sotsial'nye konstrukty: ramki analiza . Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii , 2004, volume 7, no. 1, pp.76-88..
  • Gaponenko A., Savel'eva M. Traditsionnye i novye faktory konkurentosposobnosti organizatsii . Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya , 2015, no. 5, pp.117-124..
  • Vazhenina I.S., Vazhenin S.G. Fenomen konkurentnogo immuniteta territorii . Obshchestvo i ekonomika , 2009, no. 11-12, pp.139-156..
  • Vazhenin S.G., Sukhikh V.V. Spetsifika doveriya kak konkurentnoi tseli v ekonomike . Vestnik UrFU. Seriya ekonomika i upravlenie , 2015, no.2, pp.4-23..
  • Vazhenina I., Vazhenin S., Sukhikh V. Konkurentsiya za doverie v ekonomike: sushchnost' i perspektivy razvitiya . Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya , 2015, no. 7, pp. 78-86..
  • Osnova uspekha -doverie . Vedomosti Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Novosibirskoi oblasti . 2015, no. 46. Available at: http://www.vedomosti.sfo.ru/articles/?article=46276 (accessed 15.04.2016)..
  • Zuenko I. Kak kitaiskie regiony reshayut problemy za schet sosedstva s Rossiei . Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi . Available at: http://www.carnegie.ru/publications/?fa=62026 (accessed 11.04.2016)..
  • Ol'sevich Yu.Ya. Fundamental'naya neopredelennost' rynka i kontseptsii sovremennogo krizisa . Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2011. 51 p..
  • Vazhenin S.G., Sukhikh V.V. Opportunizm i konstruirovanie doveriya v ekonomike . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii , 2013, no. 1, pp.78-85..
  • Covey Junior S., Merrill R. Skorost' doveriya. To, chto menyaet vse . Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher, 2010. 432 p..
  • Radaev V.V. Sotsiologiya rynkov: k formirovaniyu novogo napravleniya . Moscow: GU VShE, 2003. 328 p..
  • Vazhenina I.S. Delovaya reputatsiya kak konkurentnyi resurs kompanii . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii , 2006, no. 4, pp.134-150..
  • Shaw R. B. Klyuchi k doveriyu v organizatsii: Rezul'tativnost', poryadochnost', proyavlenie zaboty . Moscow: Delo, 2000. 272 p..
  • Tominskii GOK: Opisanie proekta . Russkaya Mednaya Kompaniya . Available at: http://www.rmk-group.ru/ru/about/tominskiy-gok/(accessed 29.03.2016)..
  • “Uchites' razgovarivat' s lyud'mi!” . Rossiiskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo URA. RU . Available at: http://ura.ru/articles/1036261774 (accessed 24.03.2016)..
  • Eidelman N.Ya. “Byt' mozhet za khrebtom Kavkaza” . Russkaya literatura i obshchestvennaya mysl' pervoi poloviny XIX veka. Kavkazskii aspect . Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 320 p..
  • Tatarkin A.I., Sukhikh V.V., Vazhenin S.G. Gosudarstvo v sisteme otnoshenii doveriya v ekonomike . Obshchestvo i ekonomika , 2006, no. 10, pp.155-172..
Еще
Статья научная