Regulatory guillotine the advocacy

Purpose: To identify and problematize the manifestation of excessive rule-making in advocacy, as well as propose measures to respond to this phenomenon. Methodology: The statistical, hermeneutical and comparative legal methods were used. Results: The problem of excessive legal regulation is identified and a mechanism is proposed for overcoming this negative phenomenon in the management of advocacy. Novelty/originality/value: Lack of research on the assessment of the legal administration of advocacy on a scale of «quantity-quality», against the backdrop of legislative euphoria of the bodies of advocate self-government. The author’s use of statistical data in the field of advocacy «rule-making» indicates originality. The scientific and value character of the study is evidenced by those recommendations that the author puts forward, based on the idea of a «regulatory guillotine», to solve the problem of an excess of legal regulation in the advocacy.