Relationship between Middle School Students' Frequency of Participation in Lab Activities and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs: Turkish Case

Relationship between Middle School Students' Frequency of Participation in Lab Activities and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs: Turkish Case

Автор: Hatice Esma OZBAY, Mustafa Serdar KÖKSAL

Журнал: International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS) @ijmecs

Статья в выпуске: 12 vol.7, 2015 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The purpose of this study is to investigate relationship of fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth grade students' scientific epistemological beliefs with their frequency of participating in laboratory activities. For this purpose, correlational study method was used. Sample of the study involved 301 students purposively selected from convenient schools. The data of the study was collected by a Likert type scale called "Scientific Epistemological Beliefs Scale" and information form about frequency of participating in laboratory activities and description of sample laboratory activities. The findings showed that majority of the students never participated in lab activities or participated in one time during one year. Also the fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth grade students' scientific epistemological beliefs were significantly related to their frequency of participating in laboratory activities. They are positively correlated to each other. However there were no significant relationships between the students' scientific epistemological beliefs and their frequency of participating in laboratory activities. Hence it can be claimed that participating in lab activities is associated with development of sophisticated scientific epistemological beliefs.

Еще

Scientific epistemological beliefs, laboratory activities, correlational study, middle school students, Turkish students

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15014816

IDR: 15014816

Список литературы Relationship between Middle School Students' Frequency of Participation in Lab Activities and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs: Turkish Case

  • Deryakulu, D. Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme ve ders çalışma stratejileri ile epistemolojik inanışları arasındaki ilişki, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 38, 230-249. 2004.
  • Hofer, B.K. & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). Personel epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumassociates. 2002.
  • Perry, W.G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In a. Chickering (ed.), The Modern American Collage (pp. 76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schommer, M. Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504. 1990
  • Hofer, B. Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and instruction, Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-382. 2001.
  • Hammer, D & Elby,A. On the form of a personal epistemology, B.K. Hofer, P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Erlbaum, Mahwah. 2002. pp. 169–190.
  • Metallidou, P. Epistemological beliefs as predictors of self-regulated learning strategies in middle school students. School Psychology International, 34(3), 283–298. 2012.
  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. Self-regulated science learning with gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59–74.2002.
  • Topçu, M. S., & Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö. Elementary students' metacognition an epistemological beliefs considering science achievement, gender and socioeconomic status. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 676-693.2009.
  • Tsai, C.C. Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths: A study of eighth graders' scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities, Science Education, 83 (6), 654-674.1999.
  • Tsai, C. C. Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42, 193-205.2000.
  • Deryakulu, D. Denetim odağı ve epistemolojik inançların öğretim materyalini kavramayı denetleme türü ve düzeyi ile ilişkisi. Hacettepe Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22, 55-61.2002
  • Perry, W. G. Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.1970.
  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.1986.
  • Kuhn, D. The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.1991.
  • Kuhn, D. Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2005.
  • Tsai, C. C. Content analysis of Taiwanese 14 yearolds' information processing operations shown in cognitive structures following physics instruction, with relations to science attain mentand scientific epistemological beliefs. Research in Science &Technological Education, 17(2), 125-138. 1999.
  • Özkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Çakıroğlu, J., & Sungur, S. A conceptual model of relation ships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, epistemological beliefs, and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Difference, 9 (1), 71-79.2009.
  • Chen, J. & Pajares, F. Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87.2010.
  • Hofer, B. Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405. 2000.
  • Muis, K., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. Domain-generality and domain specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3-54. 2006.
  • Schommer-Aikins, M. & Duell, O. K. Domain specific and general epistemological beliefs. Their effects on mathematics. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31 (2), 317-330.2013.
  • Conley, M. A., Pintrich, R. P., Vekiri L. & Harrison D. Changes in epistemologicabeliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.2004.
  • Yenice, N. & Ozden, B. Analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs of eighth graders. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(2), 107-115.2013.
  • Yeşilyurt, E. İlköğretim okulu öğrencilerinin bilimsel epistemolojik inançları, International Journal of Social Science, 6 (1), 1587-1609. 2013.
  • Blosser, P. E. The role of the laboratory in science teaching. Research matters to the science teacher [On-line]. Available: http://science.coe.uwf.edu/NARST/research/labs.htm. 1990.
  • Layton, D. Students laboratory practice and the history and philosophy of science. In E.Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge.1990.pp. 37–59.
  • Lazarowitz, R.,& Tamir, P. Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. L.Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York:Macmillan. 1994. pp. 94–128.
  • Kang, N.H. & Wallace, C.S. Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165. 2005.
  • Ozdem, Y., Ertepinar, H., Cakiroglu, J., & Erduran, S. The nature of pre-service science teachers' argumentation in inquiry-oriented laboratory context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2559-2586.2013.
  • McDonald, C.V. An examination of preservice primary teachers' written arguments in an open inquiry laboratory task, Science Education International, 24 (3), 254-281. 2013.
  • Beck,C., Butler, A. & da Silva, K.B. Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: are we meeting the grade?, CBE Life Science Education, 13(3), 444-452.2014.
  • Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2006.
  • Kurt, F. Cinsiyetin, Sınıf Seviyesinin, Eğitim Gördükleri Alanların, Öğrencilerin Epistemolojik İnançları Üzerindeki Etkisi. (Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. 2009.
  • Köksal, M.S. & Çakıroğlu, J. Development of nature of science scale (NSS) for advanced science students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9, 87-98. 2010.
  • Boz Y., Aydemir M.,& Aydemir N. Türkiye'deki 4., 6. ve 8. sınıf ilköğretim öğrencilerinin epistemolojik inançları. İlköğretim Online, 10(3), 1191-1201. 2011.
  • Sadıç A., Çam A. &Topçu M.S. İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Epistemolojik İnançlarının Cinsiyet ve Sınıf Düzeyine Göre İncelenmesi. Muğla Üniversitesi. Muğla.http://kongre.nigde.edu.tr/xufbmek/dosyalar/tam_metin/pdf/2266-18_05_2012-14_43_ 19.pdf. 2012.
  • Dunbar, K. Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17, 397– 434. 1993.
  • Schauble, L.,Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 131– 166. 1995.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp