Reproductive attitudes of young families: driving forces and implementation conditions (on the basis of in-depth interviews)

Автор: Korolenko Aleksandra V., Kalachikova Olga N.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Promoting population reproduction is one of the key tasks from the standpoint of ensuring national security. In the conditions of aging motherhood, the young family becomes the most important object of demographic policy, since it is a prosperous two-parent family with children that is the main resource of quantitative and qualitative parameters of human capital. The article analyzes reproductive attitudes of young families and the drivers of their implementation. We reveal that, on average, young people are focused on creating a family and having few children. The registered failure to fulfill reproductive intentions (the desired number of children is more than their expected number) is due to the financial and economic situation of the family, the uncertainty (possible risks) of the future, and intra-family relations. The formation of young people's reproductive attitudes largely depends on their parents' example, the quality of child-parent relations and the immediate environment. With a high probability, those raised in a family with few children or those who have no siblings at all may not want to have many children or have children at all. As for children from medium and large families, they may have different views on having children. Reproductive attitudes are linked to marital ones. As a rule, the orientation toward a legitimate happy marriage is reinforced by the desire to have children. A variant of child-centered motives is observed in girls and manifested in the desire “to have a big family and many children”, which somewhat shifts the focus of the priority of intra-family relations. The importance of the housing issue and ensuring a decent standard of living for oneself and one's children is determined by the fact that the unresolved nature of these problems influences the intention to have the first child and reduces the chances of having a few and many children even if they are desirable. State support for young families is needed, despite differences in the estimates of its effectiveness. The difference lies in determining the most desirable mechanisms - it is either direct support in the form of allowances, benefits, etc., or the creation of conditions for raising children (affordable quality social infrastructure) and the possibility of decent earnings for parents. Today, a young family needs state support, and, undoubtedly, the needs of young families should be taken into account in the national demographic policy.

Еще

Young family, reproductive attitudes

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238038

IDR: 147238038   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.11

Список литературы Reproductive attitudes of young families: driving forces and implementation conditions (on the basis of in-depth interviews)

  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Behaviour. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Andreev E.M., Bondarskaya G.A. (2000). Can we use data on the expected number of children in population projections? Voprosy statistiki, 11, 56–62 (in Russian).
  • Andreev E.M., Bondarskaya G.A., Khar’kova T. (1998). Falling birthrate in Russia: Hypotheses and facts. Voprosy statistiki, 10, 82–93 (in Russian).
  • Antonov A.I., Zhavoronkov A.V., Malyavin S.I. (2005). Reproductive orientations of a rural family: A study of the degree of father-mother coincidence in 20 regions of Russia. In: Elizarov V.V., Arkhangel’skii V.N. (Eds.). Politika narodonaseleniya: nastoyashchee i budushchee. IV Valenteevskie chteniya: sb. Dokladov [Population Policy: Present and Future. IV Valenteev Readings: Collection of Papers]. Moscow: MAKS Press (in Russian).
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N. (1987). Attitudes toward having children in the value orientation system of the urban family. In: Demograficheskie aspekty uskoreniya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Demographic Aspects of the Acceleration of Socio-Economic Development]. Kyiv: IE AN USSR (in Russian).
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N. (2006). Faktory rozhdaemosti [Fertility Factors]. Moscow: TEIS.
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N., Dzhanaeva N.G. (2014). Regional characteristic of fertility dynamics and demographic policy. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 1(191), 73–82 (in Russian).
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N., Elizarov V.V., Zvereva N.V., Ivanova L.Yu. (2005). Demograficheskoe povedenie i ego determinatsiya [Demographic Behavior and Its Determination]. Moscow: TEIS.
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N., Rostovskaya T.K., Vasil’eva E.N. (2021). Influence of the standard of living on the reproductive behavior of Russians: Gender aspect. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve=Woman in Russian Society, 3–24. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2021.0.1 (in Russian).
  • Belova V.A. (1975). Chislo detei v sem’e [Number of Children in the Family]. Moscow: Statistika.
  • Belova V.A., Darskii L.E. (1972). Statistika mnenii v izuchenii rozhdaemosti [Opinion Statistics in the Study of Fertility]. Moscow: Statistika.
  • Bongaarts J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27, 260–281.
  • Borisov V.A. (1976). Perspektivy rozhdaemosti [Prospects for Fertility]. Moscow: Statistika.
  • Borozdina E., Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. (2012). Maternity capital: Social policies and strategies for families. Demoskop Weekly=Demoscope Weekly, 495–496. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0495/analit03.php (in Russian).
  • Chernova Zh.V. (2010). “Demographic reserve”: A young family as an object of state policy. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve=Woman in Russian Society, 2(55), 26–38 (in Russian).
  • Coombs L.C. (1979). Reproductive goals and achieved fertility: A fifteen-year perspective. Demography, 16(4), 523–534.
  • Darskii L.E. (1972). Statistika mnenii v izuchenii rozhdaemosti [Opinion Statistics in the Study of Fertility]. Moscow: Statistika.
  • Darskii L.E. (1979). Fertility and family reproduction. In: Volkova A.G. (Ed.). Demograficheskoe razvitie sem’i [Demographic Development of the Family]. Moscow: Statistika (in Russian).
  • Dement’eva I.F. (1991). Pervye gody braka: problemy stanovleniya molodoi sem’i [The First Years of Marriage: The Challenges of Becoming a Young Family]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Denisov S.B. (2000). The problem of defining the concept of “young family” in the theory and practice of social work. Vestnik Mordovskogo un-ta=Mordovia University Bulletin, 3, 47–53 (in Russian).
  • Dobrovol’skaya V.M. (1974). Housing conditions and demographic behavior. In: Sem’ya i zhilaya yacheika: sb. nauch. trudov [The Family and the Living Unit: Collection of Scientific Works]. Moscow (in Russian).
  • Golod S.I. (1998). Sem’ya i brak: istoriko-sotsiologicheskii analiz [Family and Marriage: A Historical and Sociological Analysis]. Saint Petersburg: Petropolis.
  • Grishina O.V. (2008). Reproductive behavior of parents and their children in Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika=Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 6, 29–41 (in Russian).
  • Gudkova T.B. (2019). Fertility intentions in Russia: Motivation and constraints. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 6(4), 83–103. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v6i4.10428 (in Russian).
  • Gurko T.A. (1985). Young family in a big city. In: Molodozheny: sb. statei [Newlyweds: Collection of Articles]. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
  • Heiland F., Prskawetz A., Sanderson W.C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population, 24(2), 129–156.
  • Ipatova A.A., Tyndik A.O. (2015). Reproductive age: 30 years old in preferences and biographies. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya=Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, 24(4), 123–148 (in Russian).
  • Katkova I.P. (1971). Rozhdaemost’ v molodykh sem’yakh [Fertility in Young Families]. Moscow: Meditsina.
  • Katkova I.P. (1973). Some socio-hygienic features of birth control in young families. In: Kompleksnoe izuchenie sostoyaniya zdorov’ya naseleniya Tambovskoi oblasti v svyazi s Vsesoyuznoi perepis’yu naseleniya 1970 [Comprehensive Study of the Population Health in the Tambov Oblast Related to the Soviet Census of 1970]. Tambov (in Russian).
  • Kharchev A.G. (1979). Brak i sem’ya v SSSR [Marriage and Family in the USSR]. 2nd ed. revised and supplemented. Moscow: Mysl’.
  • Krasnenkov V.L., Frolova N.A. (1984). Socio-hygienic aspects of birth control in young families living in rural areas. Sem’ya i obshchestvo=Family and Society, 24–25, Moscow.
  • Kravtsova G.F., Pleshakova M.V. (1991). Formirovanie sem’i v dal’nevostochnom gorode [Family Formation in a Far Eastern City]. Khabarovsk: DVO AN SSSR.
  • Kuz’menko T.V. (2010). Reproductive counsels of young married couple: impact of elder generation. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki=Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 4(20), 60–67 (in Russian).
  • Kuz’min A.I. (1986a). The influence of the relationship with parents on the demographic behavior of a young family. In: Razvitie i stabilizatsiya molodoi sem’I [Development and Stabilization of the Young Family]. Sverdlovsk (in Russian).
  • Kuz’min A.I. (1986b). Regional features of fertility. In: Osobennosti vosproizvodstva i migratsii naseleniya na Urale: sb. nauch. tr. [Features of Reproduction and Migration in the Urals: Collection of Scientific Works]. Sverdlovsk: UNTs AN SSSR (in Russian).
  • Kuz’min A.I. (1990). The role of the young family in the reproduction of the region’s population. In: Molodaya sem’ya i realizatsiya aktivnoi sotsial’noi politiki v regione: sb. nauch. tr. [The Young Family and the Implementation of Active Social Policy in the Region: Collection of Scientific Works]. Sverdlovsk (in Russian).
  • Kuz’min A.I. (1993). Sem’ya na Urale: demogr. aspekty vybora zhizn. puti [Family in the Urals: Demographic Aspects of Life Choice]. Yekaterinburg: Nauka: Ural. izd. firma.
  • Makarentseva A.O. (2020). The impact of the epidemiological situation on the reproductive intentions of the population. Monitoring ekonomicheskoi situatsii v Rossii. Tendentsii i vyzovy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya= Monitoring of the economic situation in Russia. Trends and challenges of socio-economic development, 17(119). Available at: https://www.iep.ru/upload/iblock/2f2/3.pdf (accessed: February 15, 2022).
  • Maleva T., Makarentseva A., Tret’yakova E. (2017). Pronatalist demographic policy in the eyes of the population: Ten years later. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy, 12(6), 124–147 (in Russian).
  • Matskovskii M.S., Gurko T.A. (1986a). Molodaya sem’ya v bol’shom gorode [Young Family in a Big City]. Moscow: Znanie.
  • Matskovskii M.S., Gurko T.A. (1986b). Successful functioning of a young family in a large city. In: Matskovskii M.S. (Ed.). Programma sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii molodoi sem’i (programmy i metodiki issledovanii braka i sem’i) [Program of Sociological Research on Young Families (Marriage and Family Research Programs and Methods)]. Moscow (in Russian).
  • Medkov V.M. (1986). Socio-demographic characteristics of spouses and their attitudes toward having children. In: Rybakovskii L.L. et al. (Eds.). Detnost’ sem’i: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Children in the Family: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.]. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
  • Mitrofanova E.S. (2011). Marriages, partnerships and fertility of generations in Russia. Demoskop Weekly=Demoscope Weekly, 477–478. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2011/0477/tema01.php (accessed: February 15, 2022; in Russian).
  • Mokerov I.P., Kuz’min A.I. (1990). Ekonomiko-demograficheskoe razvitie sem’I [Economic and Demographic Development of the Family]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Morgan S.P. (2001). Should fertility intentions inform fertility forecasts. In: Proceedings of U.S. Census Bureau Conference: The Direction of Fertility in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Morgan S.P., Rackin H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 91–118.
  • Osipova I. (2020). Reproductive attitudes of Russians and how they regard government measures to support fertility. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 7(2), 97–120. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11143 (in Russian).
  • Philipov D. (2009). Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population, 25(4), article number 355. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9202-1
  • Rodzinskaya I.Yu. (1986). Factors affecting the reproductive attitudes of spouses. In: Detnost’ sem’i: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Children in the Family: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.]. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
  • Rostovskaya T.K. (2014). The status of a young family in the modern Russian society. Chelovek v mire kul’tury=Man in the World of Culture, 3, 74–80 (in Russian).
  • Rostovskaya T.K., Arkhangel’skii V.N., Ivanova A.E., et al. (2021а). Sem’ya i demograficheskie protsessy v sovremennoi Rossii: monografiya [Family and Demographic Processes in Modern Russia: Monograph]. FNISTs RAN. Moscow: Ekon-Inform.
  • Rostovskaya T.K., Shabunova A.A. et al. (2021c). Demograficheskoe samochuvstvie regionov Rossii. Natsional’nyi demograficheskii doklad-2021 [Demographic well-being of Russian regions. National Demographic Report-2021]. Moscow: FNISTs RAN.
  • Rostovskaya T.K., Shabunova A.A., Arkhangel’skii V.N. et al. (2021d). Demograficheskoe samochuvstvie regionov Rossii. Natsional’nyi demograficheskii doklad-2020 [Demographic well-being of Russian regions. National Demographic Report-2020]. FNISTs RAN. Moscow: Perspektiva.
  • Rostovskaya T.K., Vasil’eva E.N., Knyaz’kova E.A. (2021b). Tools for in-depth interview to analyze inner motivation of reproductive, matrimonial, self-preserving and migration behavior. Voprosy upravleniya=Management Issues, 1(68), 103–117. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2021-1-103-117 (in Russian).
  • Rusanova N.E. (2020). Post-pandemic birth rate: “Baby boom” or “demographic hole”? Vestnik Moskovskogo finansovo-yuridicheskogo universiteta=Herald of the Moscow University of Finances and Law MFUA, 4, 152–159 (in Russian).
  • Safonova T.E. (1982). Number of children in the family of origin and reproductive orientations. In: Sem’ya i deti: tezisy dokladov vsesoyuznoi konferentsii [Family and Children: Abstracts of Reports of the All-Union Conference] (in Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N. (2008). Reproductive choice of modern family. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 41, 62–67 (in Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N. (2013). On the reasons for the growth of the birth rate in the period of activation of Russia’s demographic policy (in the case of the Vologda Oblast). Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 5(140), 129–136 (in Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N., Korolenko A.V. (2021). Demograficheskaya situatsiya i sotsial’no-demograficheskaya politika Vologodskoi oblasti v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19: II regional’nyi demograficheskii doklad [Demographic Situation and Socio-Demographic Policy of the Vologda Oblast in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: II Regional Demographic Report]. Vologda: VolNTs RAN.
  • Sinel’nikov A.B. (1989). Brachnost’ i rozhdaemost’ v SSSR [Marriage and Fertility Rate in the USSR]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Testa M.R., Sobotka T., Morgan P.S. (2011). Reproductive decision-making: Towards improved theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 1–9.
  • Tyndik A.O. (2012). Reproductive attitudes and their realization in modern Russia. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 10(3), 361–376 (in Russian).
  • Van de Kaa D.J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review, 27, 290–331.
  • Van Peer C., Rabušic L. (2008). Will we witness an upturn in European fertility in the near future? In: People, Population Change and Policies. Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Varlamova S.N., Noskova A.V., Sedova N.N. (2006). Family and children in the attitudes of Russians. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 10, 61–73 (in Russian).
  • Volkov A.G. (1986). Sem’ya – ob’’ekt demografii [Family as an Object of Demography]. Moscow: Mysl’.
  • Westoff C.F. (1990). Reproductive intentions and fertility rates. International Family Planning Perspectives, 16(3), 84–96.
  • Zhuk E.I. (2016). Reproductive settings of young and middle-aged muscovites. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 1, 156–174. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.1.06 (in Russian).
  • Zotin V., Mytil’ A. (1987). Ideas of newlyweds about the number of children in the family. In: Valentei D.I. et al. (Eds.). Gorodskaya i sel’skaya sem’ya [Urban and Rural Families]. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
  • Zuikova E.M., Kuznetsova N.V. (1994). Molodaya sem’ya [Young Family]. Moscow: Soyuz.
Еще
Статья научная