Rural territories development through the government support of bioenergy

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. Sustainable economic development of rural territories, especially remote areas development, is one of the priorities in government management in many countries in the world. The basis of sustainable development is the renewable energy. The paper looks at the relevant issues related to the rural areas' development under government policy in the field of sustainable development and bioenergy. The study investigates the issue through the case study of Russia. The paper looks at the relevant issues related to the rural areas' development under the alternative energy and bioenergy. The study presents an overview of scientific research in government policy instruments for bioenergy under in the frame of sustainable development and economic aspects. The most relevant issue for the rural territories - the implementation of small energy generation based on biofuel - should be dealt with comprehensively and viewed from economic to socio-environmental prospective. The role of government is to provide government support for such projects at the state level. Aims. The main aim of this article is to investigate the theoretical base of the government policy in the field of government support of bioenergy. Also the article looks at how the problem of energy supply for remote rural areas in Russia can be settled successfully by developing the network of small bioenergy plants, which are quickly growing in rural forested areas. Bioenergy development in the rural territories also will allow starting new high-tech production in remote and northern regions, providing them with an autonomous energy sources. The methods of theoretical research (systems analysis, abstraction and concretization, idealization, etc.), as well as the methods of empirical research (method of expert assessment, comparison, analogy, and generalization) are applied in the study. Results. Theoretical and practical solution of the research task will allow to complete and develop the domestic and world scientific knowledge in the field of alternative ecologically safe energy, to promote the development of mono-economy regions and to stimulate economic development and growth of the bioenergy capacity in the largest forested regions of Russia (with the possible establishment of export-oriented industries). The results that will be obtained during the project implementation are of high scientific and practical value for popularization of the green economy concept based on renewable energy, for its development in Russia and in countries with similar economic and climatic conditions, such as Canada, Finland, Norway, Switzerland and others. Conclusion. The research shows how the usage of local fuel solves the problem of providing electricity and heating to the remote settlements regardless of their remoteness and availability of transportation routes. Besides, the implementation of a small boiler operating on wood chips will help to create employment of local population, which has a very positive social impact. Creating boiler systems based on bioenergy generated with woodchip in municipalities will reduce the transportation costs of electricity and heating.

Еще

Rural territory, rural development, government policy, bioenergy, renewable energy, wood chips, remote areas, government support, regional green economy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147246652

IDR: 147246652   |   DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2018-3-489-501

Список литературы Rural territories development through the government support of bioenergy

  • Bogunovic, A. (1991), Regionalna ekonomika [Regional Economics], Narodne Novine, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Busch, G. and Thiele, J. C. (2015), "The Bioenergy Allocation and Scenario Tool (BEAST) to Assess Options for the Siting of Short Rotation Coppice in Agricultural Landscapes: Tool Development and Case Study Results from the Göttingen District", in Manning, D. B., Bemmann, A., Bredemeier, M., Lamersdorf, N. and Ammer, Ch. (ed.), Bioenergy from Dendromass for the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 23-44, doi: https:// doi.org/10.1002/9783527682973.ch4.
  • Cavicchi, B., Bryden, J. M. and Vittuari, M. (2014), "A Comparison of Bioenergy Policies and Institutional Frameworks in the Rural Areas of Emilia Romagna and Norway", Energy Policy, vol. 67, pp. 355-363, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.059.
  • Domashchenko, D. V. (2016), "Correlation between Economic Growth, Oil Prices and the Level of Monetization of Economy in Oil and Gas Exporting Countries: Challenges for Russia", Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, no. 1, pp. 96-107, doi: 10.15838/esc/2016.1.43.6.
  • Fedorenchik, A. S. and Lednicky, V. A. (2010), The Energy Use of Low Quality Wood and Wood Waste, Belarusian State Technological University Publishing House, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
  • Gerasimov, Y., Senko, S. and Karjalainen, T. (2013), "Nordic forest energy solutions in the Republic of Karelia", Forests, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 945-967, doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/f4040945.
  • González, A., Riba, J. R., Puig, R. and Navarro, P. (2015), "Review of Micro-and Small-Scale Technologies to Produce Electricity and Heat from Mediterranean Forests' Wood Chips", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 43, pp. 143155, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.013.
  • Gu, J., Renwick, N. and Xue, L. (2018), "The BRICS and Africa's Search for Green Growth, Clean Energy and Sustainable Development, Energy Policy, vol. 120, pp. 675-683, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.028.
  • Huang, S. K., Kuo, L. and Chou, K. L. (2018), "The Impacts of Government Policies on Green Utilization Diffusion and Social Benefits - A Case Study of Electric Motorcycles in Taiwan", Energy Policy, vol. 119, 473-486, doi: 10.1016/j. enpol.2018.04.061.
  • Jenssen, T., König, A. and Eltrop, L. (2014), "Bioenergy Villages in Germany: Bringing a Low Carbon Energy Supply for Rural Areas into Practice", Renewable Energy, vol. 61, pp. 74-80, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.014.
  • Jovanovic, A., Vukovic, D. and Zakic, N. (2012), "Allocation Problems of Institutional Support for Regional Development Financing in Serbia", Actual Problems of Economics, vol. 138 , pp. 370-380.
  • Kubovic, B. (1974), Regionalna ekonomika [Regional Economics], Informator, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Lavrikova, Y. G., Suvorova, A. V. and Kotlyarova, S. N. (2015), "Accounting of Multiplier Effect as a Required Element in Assessing the Effects of Social Programs", Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, no. 6, pp. 123-138, doi: 10.15838/esc/2015.6.42.7.
  • Li, J. and Sun, C. (2018), "Towards a Low Carbon Economy by Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies?", China Economic Review, vol. 50, pp. 17-33, doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.03.006.
  • Mafini, C. and Loury-Okoumba, W. V. (2018), "Extending Green Supply Chain Management Activities to Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises in a Developing Economy", South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-12, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1996.
  • Makar, S. V. and Yarasheva, A. V. (2017), "Development of Regional Forest Potential of Russia in the Context of Bio-Economic Trend", in Gaol, F. L., Filimonova, N. and Hutagalung, F. (ed.), Managing Service, Education and Knowledge Management in the Knowledge Economic Era, CRC Press, London, UK, pp. 13-18, doi: 10.1201/9781315269146-4.
  • Mingaleva, Z., Vukovic, N. and Radovanovic, M. (2017), "Solar Energy Application in Houses Heating Systems in Russia", International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 141-148, doi: 10.5937/IJCRSEE1701141M.
  • Niamir, L., Filatova, T., Voinov, A. and Bressers, H. (2018), "Transition to Low-Carbon Economy: Assessing Cumulative Impacts of Individual Behavioral Changes", Energy policy, vol. 118, pp. 325-345, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2018.03.045.
  • Perroux, F. (1970), "Note on the Concept of Growth Poles", in McKee, D., Dean, R. and Leahy, W. (ed.), Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, The Free Press, N.Y., USA, pp. 93-104.
  • Rugani, B., Golkowska, K., Vazquez-Rowe, I., Koster, D., Benetto, E. and Verdonckt, P. (2015), "Simulation of Environmental Impact Scores within the Life Cycle of Mixed Wood Chips from Alternative Short Rotation Coppice Systems in Flanders (Belgium)", Applied Energy, vol. 156, pp. 449-464, doi:10.1016/j. apenergy.2015.07.032.
  • Sgroi, F., Di Trapani, A. M., Fodera, M., Testa, R. and Tudisca, S. (2015), "Economic Assessment of Eucalyptus (Spp.) for Biomass Production as Alternative Crop in Southern Italy", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 44, pp. 614619, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.032.
  • Sikkema, R. and Fiorese, G. (2014), "Use of Forest Based Biomass for Bioenergy in EU-28", Research for Rural Development, vol. 2, pp. 7-13.
  • Sinclair, P., Cohen, B., Hansen, Y., Basson, L. and Clift, R. (2015), "Stakeholder Engagement within the Sustainability Assessment of Bioenergy: Case Studies in Heat, Power and Perennial and Annual Crops from the UK", Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 73, pp. 11-22, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.11.017.
  • Tretyakov, A. G. (2015), "Economic Accessibility of Forest Resources: Its Determining Factors and the Accuracy of the Estimates", Forestry Engineering Journal, no. 1, pp. 274-287, doi: 10.12737/11285
  • Waldenstrom, C., Ferguson, R., Sundberg, C., Tidaker, P., Westholm, E. and Akerskog, A. (2016), "Bioenergy From Agriculture: Challenges for the Rural Development Program in Sweden", Society & Natural Resources, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1467-1482, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150538.
Еще
Статья научная