Самозанятость в ненаблюдаемой экономике и ее влияние на экономический рост: мета-анализ

Самозанятость в ненаблюдаемой экономике и ее влияние на экономический рост: мета-анализ

Автор: Резник Галина Александровна, Коробкова Наталья Александровна

Журнал: Регионология @regionsar

Рубрика: Экономика и управление народным хозяйством

Статья в выпуске: 4 (117) т.29, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Введение. Мотивацией к исследованию послужила неоднозначность оценки влияния самозанятости на экономический рост, особенно в части ненаблюдаемой самозанятости. Согласно гипотезе исследования, неформальная самозанятость способствует экономическому росту. Цель статьи - по результатам проведенного исследования обобщить и систематизировать теоретические взгляды ученых по оценке характера влияния неформальной самозанятости на экономический рост. Материалы и методы. В качестве теоретической базы исследования послужили работы ученых, опубликованные в изданиях, индексируемых в Scopus и Web of Science, с 2000 по 2020 г. Данный временной период был обоснован существенными изменениями на рынке труда, вызванными возрастанием самозанятого населения. Ключевым методом исследования является метаанализ эмпирических исследований по представленной проблематике, который позволяет обобщать, оценивать и анализировать результаты эмпирических исследований, объективно определяя закономерности между результатами исследований и источниками разногласий. Результаты исследования. Представлен анализ сущности понятия «ненаблюдаемая экономика», выявлена особенность неформальной самозанятости как части ненаблюдаемой экономики. Выявлены точки зрения относительно влияния ненаблюдаемой экономики на экономический рост, приведены аргументы обеих точек зрения и результаты исследования по разным странам, в том числе России. Показано, какие методы исследования применялись различными авторами для оценки зависимости теневой самозанятости. Выделены исследования, имеющие наибольшую результативность и универсальность с точки зрения возможного практического использования полученных в них выводах. Определены предпосылки и особенности формирования неформальной самозанятости, оценено ее влияние на экономический рост. Обсуждение и заключение. Разработаны рекомендации по дальнейшему теоретико-методологическому исследованию указанной проблематики. Полученные выводы и результаты могут быть полезны при дальнейшем развитии российской системы регулирования деятельности самозанятого населения, поскольку для ее эффективного построения необходима научная проработка и методическое обоснование различных вариантов ее развития с использованием опыта других стран.

Еще

Ненаблюдаемая экономика, теневая экономика, самозанятый, социально-экономическое развитие, экономический рост, институциональные преобразования

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147236083

IDR: 147236083   |   DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.117.029.202104.794-819

Список литературы Самозанятость в ненаблюдаемой экономике и ее влияние на экономический рост: мета-анализ

  • Medina L., Schneider F.G. Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy: A Global Database and the Interaction with the Official One. CESifo Working Paper No. 7981. 2019. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3502028 (accessed 02.04.2021). (In Eng.)
  • Schneider F., Buehn A. Shadow Economy: Estimation Methods, Problems, Results and Open Questions. Open Economics. 2018; 1(1):1-29. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ openec-2017-0001
  • Friedman G. Workers without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy. Review of Keynesian Economics. 2014; 2(2):171-188. (In Eng.) doi: https:// doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03
  • Green D.D. Fueling the Gig Economy: A Case Study Evaluation of Upwork. com. Management and Economics Research Journal. 2018; 4. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.18639/MERJ.2018.04.523634
  • Gerxhani K. The Informal Sector in Developed and Less Developed Countries: A Literature Survey. Public choice. 2004; 120:267-300. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000044287.88147.5e
  • Alm J., Embaye A. Using Dynamic Panel Methods to Estimate Shadow Economies around the World, 1984-2006. Public Finance Review. 2013; 41(5):510-543. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142113482353
  • Nureev R.M., Akhmadeev D.R. Informal Unemployment in Russia: New Tendency of Development in XXI Century. Aktualnye voprosy khozyajstvennoj praktiki = Journal of Economic Regulation. 2019; 10(3):6-22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.17835/2078-5429.2019.10.3.006-022
  • Lizina O.M., Badokina T.E. Assessment of the Shadow Component in the Structure of the National Economy. Moskovskij ehkonomicheskij zhurnal = Moscow Journal. 2020; 9:155-165. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-046X-2020-10620
  • Buehn A., Schneider F. Shadow Economies in Highly Developed OECD Countries: What Are the Driving Forces? Economics Working Papers. 2013. Available at: https://ideas. repec.org/p/jku/econwp/2013_17.html (accessed 09.03.2021). (In Eng.)
  • Ihrig J., Moe K.S. Lurking in the Shadows: The Informal Sector and Government Policy. Journal of Development Economics. 2004; 73(2):541-557. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.04.004
  • Dell'Anno R. The Shadow Economy in Portugal: An Analysis with the MIMIC Approach. Journal of Applied Economics. 2007; 10(2):253-277. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.or g/10.1080/15140326.2007.12040490
  • Anderson J.E. State Tax Rankings: What Do They and Don't They Tell Us? National Tax Journal. 2012; 65(4):985-1010. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2012.4.13
  • Buehn A., Schneider F. Corruption and the Shadow Economy: Like Oil and Vinegar, Like Water and Fire? International Tax and Public Finance. 2012; 19:172-194. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9175-y
  • Bovi M., Dell'Anno R. The Changing Nature of the OECD Shadow Economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2010; 20:19-48. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00191-009-0138-8
  • Li P. The Underground Economy of Urban Villages. Urban Village Renovation. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 125-136. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8971-3_13
  • Vousinas G.L. Shadow Economy and Tax Evasion. The Achilles Heel of Greek Economy. Determinants, Effects and Policy Proposals. Journal of Money Laundering Control. 2017; 20(4):386-404. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2016-0047
  • Choi J.P., Thum M. Corruption and the Shadow Economy. International Economic Review. 2005; 46(3):817-836. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2005.00347.x
  • Baklouti N., Boujelbene Y. A Simultaneous Equation Model of Economic Growth and Shadow Economy: Is there a Difference between the Developed and Developing Countries? Economic Change and Restructuring. 2020; 53(1):151-170. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-018-9235-8
  • Dreher A., Kotsogiannis C., McCorriston S. How Do Institutions Affect Corruption and the Shadow Economy? International Tax and Public Finance. 2009; 16. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9089-5
  • Schneider F., Raczkowski K., Mróz B. Shadow Economy and Tax Evasion in the EU. Journal of Money Laundering Control. 2015; 18(1):34-51. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2014-0027
  • Oleynikova E. Exploring Necessity of Smart Management for Millenials in Digital Space. Functional Aspects of Intercultural Communication. Translation and Interpreting Issues. 2020; 4:749. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2686-8199-2020-7-749-755
  • Meager N. Foreword: JMO Special Issue on Self-Employment/Freelancing. Journal of Management & Organization. 2016; 22(6):756-763. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1017/jmo.2016.42
  • Stone D.L., Deadrick D.L., Lukaszewski K.M., Johnson R. The Influence of Technology on the Future of Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review. 2015; 25(2):216-231. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002
  • Borghi P., Mori A., Semenza R. Self-Employed Professionals in the European Labour Market. A Comparison between Italy, Germany and the UK. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2018; 24(4):405-419. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/1024258918761564
  • Maniatis A. Tax Evasion. E-Journal of Science & Technology. 2018; 13(3). Available at: http://ejst.uniwa.gr/issues/issue_56/Maniatis_56.pdf (accessed 18.06.2021). (In Eng.)
  • Elgin C., Oztunali O. Institutions, Informal Economy, and Economic Development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2014; 50(4):145-162. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.2753/REE1540-496X500409
  • Sarte P.D.G. Informality and Rent-Seeking Bureaucracies in a Model of Long-Run Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2000; 46(1):173-197. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00020-9
  • Loayza N.V. Informality in the Process of Development and Growth. The World Economy. 2016; 39(12):1856-1916. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12480
  • Amaral P.S., Quintin E. A Competitive Model of the Informal Sector. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2006; 53(7):1541-1553. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/). jmoneco.2005.07.016
  • Ihrig J., Moe K.S. The Influence of Government Policies on Informal Labor: Implications for Long-Run Growth. De Economist. 2000; 148:331-343. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004038119150
  • Feld L.P., Schneider F. Survey on the Shadow Economy and Undeclared Earnings in OECD Countries. German Economic Review. 2010; 11(2):109-149. (In Eng.) doi: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00466.x
  • Giles D.E.A., Lindsay M.T., Werkneh G. The Canadian Underground and Measured Economies: Granger Causality Results. Applied Economics. 2002; 34(18):2347-2352. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210148021
  • Schneider F., Hametner B. The Shadow Economy in Colombia: Size and Effects on Economic Growth. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy. 2014; 20(2):293-325. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2013-0059
  • Schneider F., Enste D.H. Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature. 2000; 38(1):77-114. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/ jel.38.1.77
  • Alañón A., Gómez-Antonio M. Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy in Spain: A Structural Model with Latent Variables. Applied Economics. 2005; 37(9):1011-1025. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500081788
  • Mapp T., Moore W. The Informal Economy and Economic Volatility. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies. 2015; 8(1-2):185-200. (In Eng.) doi: https:// doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2014.969291
  • Kiselkina O., Salyahov E., Fakhrutdinov R., Kamasheva A. Assessment of Influence of the Labor Shadow Sector on the Economic Growth of the Russian Economy with the Using Methods of Statistical Modeling. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015; 23:180-184. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00525-0
  • Zaman G., Goschin Z. Shadow Economy and Economic Growth in Romania. Cons and Pros. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015; 22:80-87. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00229-4
  • La Porta R., Shleifer A. The Unofficial Economy and Economic Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, the Brookings Institution. 2008; 39(2):275-363. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w14520
  • Kim B.Y., Kang Y. The Informal Economy and the Growth of Small Enterprises in Russia. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change. 2009; 17(2):351-376. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00348.x
  • Goel R.K., Saunoris J.W., Schneider F. Growth in the Shadows: Effect of the Shadow Economy on US Economic Growth over More than a Century. Contemporary Economic Policy. 2019. 37(1):50-67. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12288
  • Duarte P. The Relationship between GDP and the Size of the Informal Economy: Empirical Evidence for Spain. Empirical Economics. 2017; 52:1409-1421. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1109-1
  • Yerrabati S. Self-Employment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Is More Self-Employment Better? Journal of Economic Studies. 2021. (In Eng.) doi: https:// doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2020-0419
  • González-Sánchez V.M., Martínez R.A., de los Ríos-Sastre S. An Empirical Study for European Countries: Factors Affecting Economic Growth and Self-Employment by Gender. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22). (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229450
  • Estiin S., Mickiewicz T. Shadow Economy and Entrepreneurial Entry. Review of Development Economics. 2012; 16(4):559-578. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12004
  • Willis D.B., Hughes D.W., Boys K.A., Swindall D.C. Economic Growth through Entrepreneurship: Determinants of Self-Employed Income across Regional Economies. Papers in Regional Science. 2020; 99(1):73-95. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12482
  • Loayza N.V., Rigolini J. Informal Employment: Safety Net or Growth Engine? World Development. 2011; 39(9):1503-1515. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. worlddev.2011.02.003
  • Ugur M. Corruption's Direct Effects on Per-Capita Income Growth: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2014; 28(3):472-490. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/joes.12035
  • De Dominicis L., Florax R.J.G.M, De Groot H.L.F. A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Income Inequality and Economic Growth. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 2008; 55(5):654-682. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2008.00470.x
  • Afonso O., Neves P. C., Pinto T. The Non-Observed Economy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. Economic Systems. 2020; 44(1). (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/). ecosys.2020.100746
  • Doucouliagos H., Laroche P. Unions and Profits: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. 2009; 48(1):146-184. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00549.x
  • Schneider F., Klinglmair R. Shadow Economies Around the World: What Do We Know? Working Paper No. 1167. 2004. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=518526 (accessed 12.05.2021). (In Eng.)
  • Pickhardt M., Sarda Pons J. Size and Scope of the Underground Economy in Germany. Applied Economics. 2006; 38(14):1707-1713. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/00036840500426868
  • Schneider F., Buehn A., Montenegro C.E. New Estimates for the Shadow Economies All over the World. International Economic Journal. 2010; 24(4):443-461. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2010.525974
  • Buehn A. The Shadow Economy in German Regions: An Empirical Assessment. German Economic Review. 2012; 13(3):275-290. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-0475.2011.00557.x
  • Buehn A., Schneider F. Corruption and the Shadow Economy: Like Oil and Vinegar, Like Water and Fire? International Tax and Public Finance. 2012; 19:172-194. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9175-y
  • Asfuroglu D., Elgin C. Growth Effects of Inflation under the Presence of Informality. Bulletin of Economic Research. 2016; 68(4):311-328. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ boer. 12057
  • Bologna J. Contagious Corruption, Informal Employment, and Income: Evidence from Brazilian Municipalities. The Annals of Regional Science. 2017; 58:67-118. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0786-1
  • Lapin A.P., Druzhkov A.M. Usage of Weighted Least Squares Method Conversion Functions for Vortex Sonic Flowmeters Research. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya "Kompyuternye tekhnologii, upravlenie, radioehlektronika" = Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series "Computer Technologies, Automatic Control, Radio Electronics". 2013; 13(2):109-113. Available at: https://dspace.susu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/0001.74/4653/13. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 10.04.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  • Volchenko O.V., Shirokanova A.A. Applying Multilevel Regression Modeling to Cross-National Data (On the Example of Generalized Trust). Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie = Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling. 2016; (43):7-62. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/soc4m/article/ view/5264 (accessed 08.05.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  • Ugura M., Trushinb E., Solomona E., Guidia F. R&D and Productivity in OECD Firms and Industries: A Hierarchical Meta-Regression Analysis. Research Policy. 2016; 45(10):2069-2086. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.08.001
  • Korobkova N.A., Patturi Y.V. Self-Employed Taxation: Russian Realities and Prospects. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 2019; 18(1):203-210. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.05.24
  • Bruce D. Effects of the United States Tax System on Transitions into Self-Employment. Labour Economics. 2000; 7(5):545-574. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0927-5371(00)00013-0
  • Jansen G. Solo Self-Employment and Membership of Interest Organizations in the Netherlands: Economic, Social, and Political Determinants. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2020; 41(3):512-539. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/0143831X17723712
  • Agut García C., Núñez González C. The Regulation of Economically Dependent Self-Employed Work in Spain: A Critical Analysis and a Comparison with Italy. E-Journal of International and Comparative. Labour Studies. 2012; 1(1-2). Available at: http:// repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/191063 (accessed 13.03.2021). (In Eng.)
  • Todolí-Signes A. The 'Gig Economy': Employee, Self-Employed or the Need for a Special Employment Regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2017; 23(2):193-205. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©