Screening of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) germplasm for drought stress

Screening of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) germplasm for drought stress

Автор: Priya S., Franklin C.J.

Журнал: Журнал стресс-физиологии и биохимии @jspb

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.19, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Common bean is a species having high nutritional composition. Drought response in plants is complex phenomenon relating interactions between structure, functions and development of the plant. The Improvement of drought resistant for common bean has major objectives for many breeding programs. The growth of the plant, related to the parameter plays a vital role in the selection criteria for drought resistance. The increasing drought tolerance in commercial varieties is highly desirable. 20 varieties of common bean leaves were collected, it is subjected in vitro water stress with 10% polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000). The parameters are determined as a relative water content (RWC), seedling root length, leaf area, stomatal index, wax and proline. The result points out that these varieties responded differently during the drought stress. Tolerant and Susceptible comes under the varieties that are categorized which are based on RWC. The tolerant varieties maintain a high water content. Generally, the tolerant varieties are higher in seedling root length, leaf area, stomatal index, wax than the susceptible varieties. The proline accumulations are higher in susceptible varieties when compared to the tolerant varieties. A significant correlation was observed from the above parameters. The results are discussed with reference to the plant’s response during drought.

Еще

Common bean, drought, proline, relative water content, stomatal index, susceptible, tolerant, wax

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143180977

IDR: 143180977

Список литературы Screening of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) germplasm for drought stress

  • Acosta-Gallegos J. A. (1988). Selection of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) Genotypes with Enhanced Drought Tolerance and Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  • Andrade. J.L., Larquee-Saavedra A. and Trejo C.L. (1995). Proline accumulation in leaves of four cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. with different drought resistance, Phyton 57: 149-157.
  • Araus J. L., Slafer G. A., Reynolds M. P. and Royo C. (2002). Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann. Bot. 89, 925-940 10.1093/aob/mcf049.
  • Bates LS, Waldren RP and Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205-207.
  • Beebe S. E. (2012). Common bean breeding in the tropics. Plant Breed. Rev. 36, 357-426
  • Blum A. (1988). Plant Breeding for Stress environments. CRC Press Florida 212. pp. 223. ISBN 0-8493-63888.
  • Canavar Oner, Klaus-Peter Gotz, Frank Ellmer, FrankMichael Chmielewski, Mustafa Ali Kaynak. (2014). Determination of the relationship between water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and proline in sunflower genotypes under drought stress. AJCS 8(2):232-242 ISSN:1835-2707.
  • Choudhury Apurba Kanti, Md Abdul Karim, Md Moynul Haque, Qazi Abdul Khaliq, Jalal Uddin Ahmed and Mohammad Mofazzal Hossain (2014). Leaf Water Status and Its Relationship with Reproductive Responses of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes under Water Stress. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 5:1547-1556.
  • Edwin-Wosu, L. Nsirim and Ndukwu. C. Benjamin. (2012). Biosystematic Studies in Loganiaceae (Series 3): Stomatal Morphology Inrelation to intraspecific delimitation among members of the tree species in the Genus Anthocleista found in parts of Tropical Rainforest in Nigeria. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2 (3):807-813.
  • Ganjeali Ali, Hassan Porsaa, and Abdolreza Bagheri. (2011). Assessment of Iranian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms for drought tolerance. Agricultural Water Management 98: 1477- 1484.
  • Kavi Kishor PB, Hong Z, Miao G-H, Hu C-AA and Verma DPS (1995). Over-expression of [delta]-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 108:1387-1394.
  • Kaydan, D. and M. Yagmur, (2008). Germination seedling growth and relative water content of shoot in different seed sizes of triticale under osmotic stress of water and NaCl. African Journal of Biotechnology. 7: 28622868.
  • Lydia Lasley Amy. (2013). Evaluation of root traits associated with drought tolerance in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A thesis Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology - Crop and Soil Sciences - Master of Science.
  • Maggio, A., Miyazaki, S., Veronese, P., Fujita, T., Ibeas, J. I., Damsz, B..... & Bressan, R. A. (2002). Does proline accumulation play an active role in stress-induced growth reduction?. The plant journal, 31(6), 699-712.
  • McGee, D. C. (1988). Maize Diseases: A Reference Source for Seed Technologists. APS Press St. Paul.MN. p. 150.
  • Mitra J. (2001). Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Curr. Sci. 80: 758762.
  • Mokter Hossaina Md, Xueyi Liub, Xusheng Qic, Hon-Ming Lama and Jianhua Zhanga, (2014). Differences between soybean genotypes in physiological response to sequential soil drying and rewetting. The crop journal 2: 366 - 380.
  • Pandey S. K. and Hema Singh (2011). A Simple, Cost-Effective Method for Leaf Area. Journal of Botany Vol. Article ID 658240, 6 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/658240
  • Rauf S (2008). Breeding sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for drought tolerance. Commun Biometry Crop Sci. 3: 29-44.
  • Romero L., and Ruiz J.M., (2010). Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants, Plant Sci. 178 30e40.
  • Sanchez-Rodriguez E., M.M. Rubio-Wilhelmi, L.M. Cervilla, B. Blasco, J.J. Rios, M.A. Rosales, Sponchiado B.N., White J.W., Castillo J.A. and Jones P.G. (1989). Root growth of four common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance in environments with contrasting soil types. Experimental Agriculture 25:249-257.
  • Stoyanov ZZ, (2005). Effects of water stress on leaf water relations of young bean plants. J. Cent Eur Agric Vol. 6: (5-14).
  • Trivedi. R. (2014). Morpho-anatomical characterization of groundnut genotypes showing differential reaction to late leaf spot pathogen. Journal of Botany Vol. 12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/658240.
  • Victor Montero-Tavera, Roberto Ruiz-Medrano, and Beatriz Xoconostle-Cazares. (2008). Systemic nature of drought-tolerance in common bean. Plant Signal Behav 3(9): 663-666 PMCID: PMC2634550.
  • White J. W. (1988). Preliminary results of the Bean International Drought Yield Trial (BIDYT), in Research on Drought Tolerance in Common Bean. Working Document No. 41, eds White J. W., Hoogenboom J. W. D., Ibarra F., Singh S. P., editors. (Cali, Colombia: CIAT; ), 126-145.
  • White J. W. and Castillo J. A. (1989). Relative effect of root and shoot genotypes and yield on common bean under drought stress. Crop Sci. 29, 360-362
  • White J.W. and Singh, S.P. (1991). Breeding for adaptation to drought. In: A. van Schoonhoven and O. Voysest (ed.) Common beans: Research for crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, UK & CIAT, Cali, Colombia pp. 501-560.
  • Zadraznik T., Hollung K., Egge-Jacobsen W., Meglic V. and Sustar-Vozlic J. (2013). Differential proteomic analysis of drought stress response in leaves of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Proteomics. 78: 254-272.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp