Semiolinguistics of protective communication

Бесплатный доступ

The current paper investigates the notion of protective communication represented by systems of signs, texts, rituals which the authors regard as means of neutralizing cognitive constructs, generated by phobias of varying degrees of irrationality. Classification of phobias on psycho- and sociolinguistic grounds allows developing their typology from the point of view of the cause of their origin: supernatural entities (superstition), individual fearful images (prejudice), social suspicion (bias). As the study showed, sacred horror caused by destructive forces of nature, climatic phenomena not subjected to man, and astronomical events gave rise to supernatural, esoteric phobias reflected in superstitions. Biological phobias appeared in response to real dangers, associated with daily human activities, personal imaginarytroubles and fears, which generated a system of prejudice invented by man himself. Social interaction of people, with its negative stereotyping and categorization of social space, entailed a wide range of phobias (racial, religious, age, gender, etc,) which turned into social biases. On his way of development, a man tried hard to find protection against phobias of different nature, creating an extensive system of protective means incorporated in religious, magical and intolerant types of discourse, consequently neutralizing superstitions, prejudices and biases in specific genres, verbal and non-verbal signs, texts and rituals of the above mentioned types of discourse.

Еще

Protective communication, superstition, prejudice, bias, religious discourse, magical discourse, intolerant discourse

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149129985

IDR: 149129985   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2019.3.14

Список литературы Semiolinguistics of protective communication

  • Allport G.W., 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, Addison-Wesley. 467 p.
  • Astafurova T.N., Olyanich А.V. 2015. Lingvosemiotika vlastnogo rituala [Lingua-Semiotics of Power Ritual]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2, Yazykoznaniye [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 2 (26), pp. 41-49. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2015.2.5
  • Astafurova T.N., Olyanich А.V., 2018. Semiolinguistics of Sacred Power. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2, Yazykoznaniye [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 180-187. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.4.17
  • Bakhtin M.M., 1997. Problema rechevykh zhanrov [The Problem of Speech Genres]. Sobranie sochineniy. V 7 t. T. 5 [Collected Works. In 7 vols. Vol. 5]. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., pp. 159-206.
  • Benveniste E., 1971. General Linguistics. University of Miami Press. 371 p.
  • Condor S., 2006. Social Identity and Time. Robinson W.P., ed. Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel. London, Butterworth / Heinemann, pp. 285-315.
  • Dijk T.A. van, 1985. Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam, Benjamin. 170 p.
  • Ivanova O.F., 2002. Politkorrektnost v Rossii [Political Correctness in Russia]. Vestnik Evrazii [Acta Eurasica], no. 3. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9457411 (accessed 5 May 2018).
  • Luria A.R., 1998. Language and Consciousness. Moscow, Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta. 335 p.
  • Mechkovskaya N.I., 1998. Language and Religion. Moscow, Fair Publ. 352 p.
  • Morris C., 1938. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. New York, George Brazilles. 60 p.
  • Shcherbatykh Yu.V., 2007. Psychology of Fear. Moscow, Eksmo Publ. 512 p.
  • Shmelyova T.V., 1995. Rechevoy zhanr: opyt obshchefilologicheskogo osmysleniya [Speech Genre: the Experience of a General Philological Understanding]. Collegium, no. 1/2, pp. 57-65.
  • Wetherell M., 1987. Unequal Egalitarianism: A Preliminary Study of Discourses Concerning Gender and Employment Opportunities. Social Psychology, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 59-71.
  • Wodak R., 1996. The Genesis of Racist Discourse in Austria since 1989. Caldas-Coulthard С.R., Coulthard M., eds. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London, Routledge, pp. 107-128.
Еще
Статья научная