Shared values in the formation of a modern techno-economic paradigm

Автор: Romanova Olga Aleksandrovna, Akberdina Iktoriya Viktorovna, Bukhvalov Nikolai Yuvenalevich

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Innovation development

Статья в выпуске: 3 (45) т.9, 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article presents the evolution of the concept of techno-economic paradigm. It points out that the concept of transformative investments (impact investing) has a significant impact on the formation of a modern techno-economic paradigm. In the framework of this concept, “shared values” are considered as a central element in the development strategy of any state. The ideology of shared values is based on pragmatic principles that create economic value to meet the interests of society. It is based on “three pillars of sustainable development”: planet, people and profit. The authors identify three main types of impact investing - responsible investing, development investing, localizing investing. The paper highlights the most important areas of impact investing and substantiates the expediency of promoting the ideas of impact investing at the level of individual business entities, which formulate a specific approach to the management of socio-economic systems of the micro-level, the authors call this approach “impact management”...

Еще

Techno-economic paradigm, transformative investments (shared values), inclusive development, structural inclusion, spatial inclusion, impact management, agglomeration

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147223835

IDR: 147223835   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2016.3.45.10

Список литературы Shared values in the formation of a modern techno-economic paradigm

  • Akaev A.A. Bol'shie tsikly kon»yunktury i innovatsionno-tsiklicheskaya teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Shumpetera-Kondrat'eva . Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii , 2013, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 7-29. .
  • Akaev A.A., Rumyantseva S.Yu., Sarygulov A.I., Sokolov V.N. O strukturno-tekhnologicheskoi paradigme tekhnologicheskoi modernizatsii ekonomiki . Kondrat'evskie volny , 2015, no. 4, pp. 23-53. .
  • Babikova A.V. Gosudarstvennye promyshlennye korporatsii i formirovanie novoi tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi paradigmy: strategiya innovatsionnogo razvitiya . Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki , 2015, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 19-22. .
  • Brazevich D.S. Sovremennyi nauchnyi diskurs po probleme innovatsii: ot tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi paradigmy k sotsiokul'turnoi . Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment , 2014, no. 4, pp. 50-54. .
  • Bukhvalov N.Yu. Impakt-menedzhment i ierarkhichnost' mul'tiintellektual'noi sistemy upravleniya vysokotekhnologichnym predpriyatiem . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii , 2016, no. 2, pp. 48-56. .
  • Gureev P.M. Transdistsiplinarnaya kontseptsiya tsiklicheskogo razvitiya tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi paradigmy . Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya , 2016, no. 3, pp. 55-58. .
  • Glazyev S.Yu., Mikerin G.I., Teslya P.N. et al. Dlinnye volny: nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie . Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sibirskoe otdelenie, 1991. 224 p. .
  • Dmitrii Medvedev vyvel formulu inklyuzivnogo razvitiya ekonomiki Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona . Available at: http://bujet.ru/article/126201.php. .
  • Zakon Sverdlovskoi oblasti ot 21 dekabrya 2015 g. № 151-OZ “O Strategii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sverdlovskoi oblasti na 2016-2030 gody” . Available at: http://www.garant.ru/hotlaw/sverdlovsk/679712/#ixzz46Ls3EZpx. .
  • Kokoshin A., Bartenev V. Problemy vzaimozavisimosti bezopasnosti i razvitiya v strategicheskom planirovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ot tselepolaganiya k prognozirovaniyu . Problemy prognozirovaniya , 2015, no. 6, pp. 6-17. .
  • Konkurentosposobnost' sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem: vyzovy novogo vremeni . Under the scientific editorship of A.I. Tatarkin and V.V. Krivorotov. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2014. 466 p. .
  • Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii . Moscow: Progress, 1997. 300 p. .
  • Malyshkin P.A., Tanina M.A. Formirovanie sistemy preobrazhayushchikh investitsii v territorial'nom obshchestvennom samoupravlenii . Nauchnye zapiski molodykh issledovatelei , 2016, no. 1, pp. 52-62. .
  • Perez C. Tekhnologicheskie revolyutsii i finansovyi kapital. Dinamika puzyrei i periodov protsvetaniya . Moscow: Delo; RANKhiGS, 2011. 232 p. .
  • Filatova M.G. Strukturnaya perestroika promyshlennosti: sushchnost', zakonomernosti, mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya . Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 1999. 227 p. .
  • Reichheld F., Markey R. Iskrennyaya loyal'nost'. Klyuch k zavoevaniyu klientov na vsyu zhizn' . Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2012. 352 p. .
  • Elkington J. Lyudoedy s vilkami . Available at: http://appli6.hec.fr/amo/Public/Files/Docs/148_en.pdf
  • Yurasov I.A., Bondarenko V.V., Tanina M.A., Yudina V.A. Modelirovanie sistemy impakt-investirovaniya v razvitie informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoi infrastruktury seti territorial'nogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya . Upravlenie razvitiem territorii na osnove preobrazhayushchikh investitsii . Ed.by V.V. Bondarenko. Penza: Izd-vo PGU, 2015. Pp. 209-217. .
  • Yurasov I.A., Bondarenko V.V., Tanina M.A., Yudina V.A. Kontseptualizatsiya ponyatiya preobrazuyushchikh investitsii v sfere territorial'nogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya na osnove modelirovaniya setevogo upravleniya territoriei . Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki , 2015, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 143-160. .
  • Barnes T. New economic geography. The Dictionary of Human Geography. Ed. by D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M.J. Watts, S. Whatmore. 5th edition. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 500 p.
  • Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. vol. 1 (1996), vol. 2 (1997), vol. 3 (1998). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Dinc M., Haynes K.E. Sources of regional inefficiency: an integrated shift-share, data envelopment analysis and input-output approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 1999, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 469-489.
  • Fujita M., Krugman P. The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 2004, vol. 83, pp. 139-164;
  • Lall S.V., Yilmaz S. Regional economic convergence: Do policy instruments make a difference? The Annals of Regional Science, 2001, vol.35, no. 1, p. 160.
  • Leijonhufvud C., O'Donohoe N., Saltuk Y., Bugg-Levine A., Brandenburg M. Impact Investment. J.P. Morgan Global Research, 2010. Available at: http://ventureatlanta.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/JP-Morgan-impact_investments_nov2010.pdf
  • Porter M. E., Kramer M.R. Creating shared value: redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Harvard Business Review, 2011, January/February, vol. 89, no. 1/2, pp. 62-77.
  • Porter M., Kramer M. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 2011, no. 1, 17 p. Reprint R1101C. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/fellows/N_Lovegrove_Study_Group/Session_1/Michael_Porter_Creating_Shared_Value.pdf
Еще
Статья научная