Social innovation in Spain, China and Russia: key aspects of development

Автор: Soloveva Tatyana S., Popov Andrei V., Caro-Gonzalez Antonia, Hua Li, Соловьева Т.С.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Innovation development

Статья в выпуске: 2 (56) т.11, 2018 года.

Бесплатный доступ

As traditional methods of governance are unable to promptly respond to the conglomerate of issues brought about by system-wide changes and modernity, social innovation is seen as a promising alternative. Its uptake, however, is facilitated and hindered by a variety of factors. Using Spain, China, and Russia as country cases, this article explicates the findings of a systems-based comparative analysis on the drivers and barriers to the development of social innovations as effective tools in addressing social problems. In depth research projects carried out at national or regional levels provides the background knowledge to analyze the scope, size, trajectory, goals and target groups of the initiatives, as well as the geographical, historical and socio-economic frameworks and environments of the social innovations studied. It was found that there is a need to further clarify the concept of social innovation and to stimulate awareness and public support for social entrepreneurship across all three cases. Specific fiscal, legislative, and social measures are also identified for social innovation initiatives to flourish in each of the three countries analyzed. These findings provide a valuable contribution to public policy by illuminating practical ways to move forward in making social innovation an effective and sustainable strategy for addressing pertinent societal issues.

Еще

Social innovation, social policy, drivers, barriers, social entrepreneurship, management, social development

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224045

IDR: 147224045   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.2.56.4

Список литературы Social innovation in Spain, China and Russia: key aspects of development

  • Klimczuk A. Comparative analysis of national and regional models of the silver economy in the European Union. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2016, no. 10 (2), рр. 31-59.
  • Hansson J., Björk F., Lundborg D., Olofsson L.E. An Ecosystem for Social Innovation in Sweden -A Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda. Lund: Lund University, 2014. 44 р.
  • Chuvakova S.G. Innovations in social sphere and sphere of employment as base preconditions of modernization of domestic economy. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’=National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2010, no. 17 (74), pp. 75-79..
  • The Young Foundation Social Innovation Overview: A deliverable of the project: "The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe" (TEPSIE), European Commission -7th Framework Program. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research, 2012. Part 1. 43 р.
  • Owen R. A new view of society. Essays on the formation of human character, and the application of the principle to practice. London: Cadell & Davies, 1813. Available at: http://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/pluginfile.php/607280/mod_resource/content/2/a207_12_essay1.pdf.
  • Marx K. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1: The Process of Capitalist Production. Translated from the 3rd German edition by S. Moore and E. Aveling. Chicago: C.H. Kerr and Co., 1909. Available at: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/marx-capital-a-critique-of-political-economy-volume-i-the-process-of-capitalist-production
  • Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Martino Fine Books, 2012. 450 p.
  • Durkheim E. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press, 1982. 264 p.
  • Drucker P.F. Social innovation, management, new dimension. Long Range Planning, 1987, no. 20 (6), pp. 29-34.
  • Young M. The Social Scientist as Innovator. Cambridge, Mass: Abt Books, 1983. 265 p.
  • Pol E., Ville S. Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009, no. 38, рр. 878-885.
  • Solov’eva T.S., Popov A.V. Social innovations in employment: a regional perspective. Ars Administrandi, 2015, no. 2, pp. 65-84..
  • Richez-Вattesti N., Vallade D. ESS et innovations sociales: quel modèle socio économique d’incubateur? Revue d’innovation, 2009, no. 30, pp. 41-61.
  • Bouchard M.J., Klein J.L., Harrisson D. L’innovation sociale en économie sociale. L’innovation sociale émergence et effets sur la transformation des sociétés. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal, 2006. Pp. 121-138.
  • Osborne S., Brown K. Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. London: Routledge, 2005. 273 p.
  • Fernandez M.T., Pineda O.M., Chaves R.A. La innovación social como solución a la crisis: hacia un nuevo paradigma de desarrollo. XIII Jornadas de Economia Critica, 2012, February9-11, pp. 1084-1101.
  • European Commission. Social innovation research in the European Union Approaches, findings and future directions. Policy Review. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities, 2013. Available at: http://www.net4society.eu/_media/social_innovation.pdf
  • Monzón Campos J.L., Chaves Ávila R. The social economy in the European Union. Report drawn up for the European Economic and Social Committee by the International Centre of Research and Information on the Public, Social and Cooperative Economy (CIRIEC). Brussels: Visits and Publications Unit, 2012. Available at: http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/qe-30-12-790-en-c.pdf
  • Bernaola G., Atxutegi G. La innovación social en el País Vasco. De la teoría a la práctica. Revista Española Del Tercer Sector. 2017. Pp. 183-188.
  • Innobasque. Informe Opentric, nuestro modelo de innovación. Bilbao, 2011. Available at: https://www.elkarbide.com/sites/default/files/innobasque_1_tr_2011.pdf
  • Caro-Gonzalez A. PhD Thesis "Las Empresas de Inserción y sus Entidades Promotoras: tejido social para la inclusión social en el País Vasco". Las Empresas de Inserción y su papel en el proceso de inclusión de la población inmigrante en el País Vasco. University of Deusto, 2015.
  • Integrated approaches to combating poverty and social exclusion. Best practices from EU Member States. Hague: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, 2016, Pp. 32-33. Available at: http://www.effectiefarmoedebeleid.nl/files/3614/6668/9668/WEB_93954_EUNL_Brochure_A4.pdf
  • Lin K., Dan B., Yi L. An exogenous path of development: explaining the rise of corporate social responsibility in China. International Journal of Social Quality, 2016, № 6 (1), pр. 107-123.
  • Xue J. Operating the strategy of employment first. People’s Tribune, 2017, no. 13, рр. 86-87.
  • Feng L., Yuan B. Innovation how the first impetus leads the development (focusing on the Nineteenth Congress Report and changing to the high quality development stage 3). Available at: http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2017/1102/c1001-29621827.html
  • Liao X., Qiu A. The study of dynamic and resistant factors in social management innovation and its countermeasures. Chinese Public Administration, 2013, no. 3, рр. 62-65.
  • Wang C. Zhejiang University Wangxin Science and Technology Park: becoming a partner of time. Zhejiang Online, 2015. 7 May. Available at: http://biz.zjol.com.cn/system/2015/05/07/020639709.shtml
  • Chen T. Honeycomb-like houses are creating double ecological mass entrepreneurship room. Zhejiang Daily, 2015, 28 May. Available at: http://news.xinhuanet.com/local/2015-05/28/c_127849737
  • Starostin A.M., Ponedelkov A.V., Shvets L.G. Civil society in Russia in the context of transfer of innovation. Vlast’=Power, 2016, no. 5, pp. 5-15..
  • Farakhutdinov Sh.F. Study readiness for innovation in rural areas of the Tyumen region. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal=Regional Economics and Management: Online Scientific Journal, 2016, no. 4 (48), pp. 357-365..
  • Moskovskaya A.A., Soboleva I.V. Social entrepreneurship in the system of social policy: international experience and prospects of Russia. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2016, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 701-706. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700716060113
  • Krasnopol’skaya I.I., Mersiyanova I.V. Transformation of the social sphere administration: demand for social innovations. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya=Problems of state and municipal management, 2015, no. 2, pp. 29-52..
  • Shabunova A.A., Popov A.V., Solov’eva T.S. The potential of women in the labor market of the region. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2017, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 124-144. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.1.49.7
  • Enciso M., Soinu O., Henry G. Southern Europe. Social innovation strategies -regional report. TUDO: Technische Universität Dortmund, 2015. Pp. 42-57.
  • Lin K. East Asia. Social innovation strategies -regional report. TUDO: Technische Universität Dortmund, 2015. Pp. 95-101.
  • European Pillar of Social Rights 2017. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/social-summit-european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en.pdf
  • Solov’eva T.S. The role of social innovations in solving social problems: Russia’s and Belarus’s experience. Belorusskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal= Belarusian Economic Journal, 2017, no. 3 (80), pp. 92-103..
  • Leeuw, F., Vaessen, J. (Eds.) Impact Evaluations and Development -Nonie Guidance On Impact Evaluation. Washington: Nonie, 2009. Pp. 21-34.
Еще
Статья научная