Socio-cultural types of population in the region
Автор: Lastochkina Mariya Aleksandrovna
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Social development
Статья в выпуске: 4 (22) т.5, 2012 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The article presents an analysis of ISEDT RAS social study carried out in the Vologda Oblast that allowed the authors to identify the most important aspects of socio-cultural modernization: the differentiation of behavior, psychological traits of individuals and social self-identification. It is shown that the population of the region, involved in the transformation, is in the process of socio-cultural division into groups that have dissimilar behavioral characteristics; a new system of interests and value relation to the current changes is formed in different social strata.
Vologda oblast, socio-cultural types, modernization, values, socio-cultural dynamics
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147223378
IDR: 147223378
Список литературы Socio-cultural types of population in the region
- Antonova M.A. Cultural capital of the population in the Vologda Oblast. Problems of Development of Territories. 2012. No. 2(58). P. 62-69.
- Belyayeva L.A. Social strata in Russia. Experience of cluster analysis. Sotcis. 2005. No. 12.
- Demidov A.M. The study of socio-cultural styles in Russia: Ten years later. Sotcis. 2011. No. 12. P. 131-136.
- Epishin Yu.G. Integral characteristics of the state’s role and level of socio-economic development: cross-country analysis. In: Mathematical and computer modeling of socio-economic processes: Sat. Articles. Ed. by Yu.N. Gavrilets. Moscow: CEMI RAS, 1997. P. 53-60.
- Zarakovskiy G.M. Quality of life in Russia: psychological components. Moscow, 2009.
- Leonidova G.V. Areas of intellectual capacity assessment. Federalism. 2011. No. 2. P. 69-80.
- The strategy of socio-economic development of the country up to 2020. Available at: http://strategy2020.rian.ru/
- Shabunova A.A., Okulova N.A. Population assessment of socio-cultural environment in the region. Sociological Studies. 2011. No. 6. P. 36-43.
