Socio-economic vulnerability of regional communities: sociological interpretation and assessment

Автор: Pasovets Yu.M.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The relevance of the study of the socio-economic vulnerability of Russian regions is due to the need to reveal their internal characteristics, indicating unresolved and emerging social problems that weaken the possibilities of regions functioning and productive dynamics. The aim of the work is to clarify the concept of socio-economic vulnerability of the regional community; to define the possibilities of its sociological measurement based on a combination of objective and subjective data; to identify significant characteristics of vulnerability of region socio-economic sphere in contemporary conditions by the example of the regions of the Central Chernozem region. The originality of its formulation and solution is associated with the interpretation of the this phenomenon through the prism of key social problems manifested in objective characteristics and subjective assessments of the population, the promotion of a methodic approach to its sociological diagnosis based on rethinking the heuristic capabilities of the methodic tools of the interregional scientific program, the assessment of important parameters of socio economic vulnerability of the Central Chernozem regions. The empirical object of research is the Central Chernozem regions of Russia - the Voronezh, Kursk and Lipetsk oblasts. The informational basis of research is the data of state statistics (Rosstat); the empirical base is the results of representative survey (N=1200 people) based on the typical program and methodic tools “Socio-cultural portrait of the Russian region”. The paper clarifies the concept of socio-economic vulnerability of regional community, understood as its condition due to the internal characteristics of the socio-economic sphere, concentrating social problems of an objective-subjective nature. It defines the possibilities of its diagnosis based on a combination of measuring objective facts and subjective assessments on a number of indicators of the typical methodic. It reveals the key vulnerabilities of the socio-economic sphere of the central chernozem regions in contemporary conditions: the prevalence of poverty and a high degree of socio-economic differentiation of the population in a subjective measurement; the downward short-term dynamics of the material status of a population significant part. The results expand the scientific understanding of the socio-economic vulnerability of regional communities and can be used to define their social problems of objective and subjective nature and to find ways to solve them.

Еще

Socio-economic vulnerability, material status, poverty, socio-economic polarization, regional community, russian society

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241619

IDR: 147241619   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.13

Список литературы Socio-economic vulnerability of regional communities: sociological interpretation and assessment

  • Alekseenok A.A., Mikhalev I.V. (2020). Socio-economic situation of the poor population in the conditions of transformation of the social structure of modern Russian society. Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk=Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 29–45. DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2020-15-4-29-45 (in Russian).
  • Arthurson K., Baum S. (2015). Making space for inclusion in conceptualizing climate change vulnerability. Local Environment, 20(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.818951
  • Baburin V.L., Badina S.V., Goryachko M.D. et al. (2016). Vulnerability assessment of socio-economic development of the Russian Arctic territories. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya, 6, 71–77 (in Russian).
  • Balasubramani K., Sekar L.G., Kanagarajan A. et al. (2021). Revealing the socio-economic vulnerability and multi-hazard risks at micro-administrative units in the coastal plains of Tamil Nadu, India. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12(1), 605‒630. DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2021.1886183
  • Belekhova G.V. (2023). The scale of inequality and the specifics of its perception in modern Russia. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(1), 164–185. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.9 (in Russian).
  • Belyaeva L.A. (2021). Civilizational heterogeneity of Russia. Property in the field of civilizational development. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 12(3), 27–53. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2021.12.3.736 (in Russian).
  • Blackwood L., Cutter S.L. (2023). The application of the social vulnerability index (SoVI) for geo-targeting of post-disaster recovery resources. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 92, 103722. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103722
  • Bruneckiene J., Pekarskiene I., Palekiene O., Simanaviciene Z. (2019). An assessment of socio-economic systems’ resilience to economic shocks: The case of Lithuanian regions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3), 566. DOI: 10.3390/su11030566
  • Buzási A., Jäger B.S., Hortay O. (2022). Mixed approach to assess urban sustainability and resilience – a spatio-temporal perspective. City and Environment Interactions, 16, 100088. DOI: 10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100088
  • Cutter S.L., Barnes L., Berry M. et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
  • Derakhshan S., Emrich C.T., Cutter S.L. (2022). Degree and direction of overlap between social vulnerability and community resilience measurements. PLoS ONE, 17(10), e0275975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275975
  • Dutta S., Chatterjee S. (2022). Assessment of socio-economic vulnerability in a forested region: An indicator-based study in Bankura District of West Bengal, India. In: Geospatial Technology for Environmental Hazards. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75197-5_21
  • Emrich C.T. (2005). Social Vulnerability in US Metropolitan Areas: Improvements in Hazard Vulnerability Assessment. University of South Carolina.
  • Gorshkov M.K. (2020). Russian society in measurement. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 90(3), 232–242. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320030068 (in Russian).
  • Ikram M., Zhang Q., Sroufe R., Ferasso M. (2020). The social dimensions of corporate sustainability: An integrative framework including COVID-19 insights. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–29, 8747. DOI: 10.3390/su12208747
  • Ilyin V.A., Morev M.V. (2022). Nationwide poverty – “a threat to steady development and our demographic future”. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(1), 9–33. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.1 (in Russian).
  • Johns R.A., Dixon B., Pontes R. (2020). Tale of two neighbourhoods: Biophysical and socio-economic vulnerability to climate change in Pinellas County, Florida. Local Environment, 25(9), 697–724. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1825356
  • Kandari P., Bahuguna U., Salgotra A.K. (2021). Socio-economic and demographic determinants of financial inclusion in underdeveloped regions: A case study in India. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1045–1052. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.1045
  • Kelly M.P., Adger N.W. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climate Change, 47(4), 325–352.
  • Kireyeva A.A., Nurlanova N.K., Kredina A.A. (2022). Assessment of the socio-economic performance of vulnerable and depressed territories in Kazakhstan. R-Economy, 8(1), 21–31. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2022.8.1.002
  • Lapin N.I., Belyaeva L.A., Kogai E.A. et al. (2009). Regiony v Rossii: sotsiokul’turnye portrety regionov v obshcherossiiskom kontekste [Regions in Russia: Socio-Cultural Portraits of Regions in the All-Russian Context]. Moscow: Academia.
  • Lapin N.I., Belyaeva L.A., Shabunova A.A. (Eds.). (2022). Sotsiokul’turnaya evolyutsiya Rossii: 30 let issledovanii [Sociocultural Evolution of Russia: 30 Years of Research]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir.
  • Lev M.Yu. (2021). Poverty and subsistence level of the population in providing social and economic security. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost, 4(3), 549–570. DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.4.3.112403 (in Russian).
  • Mandal K., Dey P. (2022). Coastal vulnerability analysis and RIDIT scoring of socio-economic vulnerability indicators – a case of Jagatsinghpur, Odisha. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 79, 103143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103143
  • Marsden T. (2009). Mobilities, vulnerabilities and sustainabilities: Exploring pathways from denial to sustainable rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(2), 113–131. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00479.x
  • Milovidov V.D. (2021). Inequality pandemic: New dimensions of social disparity under coronacrisis. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii=The VEO of Russia, 228(2), 59–81. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2021-228-2-59-81 (in Russian).
  • Niaz M.U. (2022). Socio-economic development and sustainable development goals: A roadmap from vulnerability to sustainability through financial inclusion. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35(1), 3243–3275. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1989319
  • Pasovets Yu.M. (2011). The quality of population’s life as an integrated index of function region’s efficiency. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo: Seriya Sotsial’nye nauki=Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 1(21), 66–73 (in Russian).
  • Pasovets Yu.M. (2019). Socio-economic identification of the population as a factor of structurization of urban space (case study of cities of Kursk Oblast). Primo Aspectu, 4(40), 7–14. DOI: 10.35211/2500-2635-2019-4-40-7-14 (in Russian).
  • Ravichandran V., Kantamaneni K., Periasamy T. et al. (2022). Monitoring of multi-aspect drought severity and socio-economic status in the semi-arid regions of Eastern Tamil Nadu, India. Water (Switzerland), 14(13), 2049. DOI: 10.3390/w14132049
  • Ren C., Zhai G., Zhou S. et al. (2018). A comprehensive assessment and spatial analysis of vulnerability of China’s provincial economies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4), 1261. DOI: 10.3390/su10041261
  • Rozhkovskaya E.A., Garkavaya V.G. (2022). Risks and sources of vulnerability for regions sustainable development. Ekonomicheskii byulleten’ Nauchno-issledovatel’skogo ekonomicheskogo instituta Ministerstva ekonomiki Respubliki Belarus’, 7(301), 23–34 (in Russian).
  • Rygel L., O’Sullivan D., Yarnal B. (2006). A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: An application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11(3), 741–764. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-006-0265-6
  • Shabunova A.A., Gruzdeva M.A. (2016). Development of the regions of the Russian Federation: Integral technique as an evaluation tool. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 1(424), 100–112 (in Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N., Leonidova G.V. et al. (2022). Sotsial’noe razvitie territorii: aktual’nye trendy i novye vyzovy [Social Development of Territories: Current Trends and New Challenges]. Vologda: Vologda Research Center of RAS.
  • Slobodenyuk E.D. (2019). Deep poverty in Russia: The specifics of the objective and subjective poor and their requests for social policy. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika, 7, 4(28), 26–38. DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2019.7.4.6797 (in Russian).
  • Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D. (2021). Resilience of economic systems in the age of globalization and sudden shocks. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk=Bulletin of the IE RAS, 5, 93–115. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2021_5_93_115 (in Russian).
  • Soboleva I.V., Sobolev E.N. (2021). Household income in a pandemic: Shifting vulnerable zones and protection mechanisms. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’, 4(3), 531–548. DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.4.3.112448 (in Russian).
  • Spiliotopoulou M., Roseland M. (2020). Urban sustainability: From theory influences to practical agendas. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18), 1–19, 7245. DOI: 10.3390/su12187245
  • Starovoitov V.G., Starovoitov N.V. (2020). Modern trends of the dynamics of property inequality, poverty, unemployment as sources of threats to the economic and national security of Russia. Razvitie i bezopasnost’, 3(7), 105–114. DOI: 10.46960/2713-2633_2020_3_105 (in Russian).
  • Sun Y., Li Y., Ma R. et al. (2022). Mapping urban socio-economic vulnerability related to heat risk: A grid-based assessment framework by combing the geospatial big Data. Urban Climate, 43, 101169. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101169
  • Tanir T., Sumi S.J., Lima A. D. S. et al. (2021). Multi-scale comparison of urban socio-economic vulnerability in the Washington, DC metropolitan region resulting from compound flooding. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 61, 102362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102362
  • Turner B.L. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 570–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
  • Van Beynen P., Akiwumi F.A., Van Beynen K. (2018). A sustainability index for small island developing states. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25(2), 99–116. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2017.1317673
  • Vasil’ev Yu.S., Didenko N.I., Cherenkov V.I. (2019). Some items and prospective drivers for sustainable development of the Arctic zone of Russian Federation. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka, 1(63), 4–26. DOI: 10.25702/KSC.2220-802X.1.2019.63.4-26 (in Russian).
  • Vyal’shina A.A. (2022). Changing priorities of rural development in conditions of increasing global instability. Regional’nye agrosistemy: ekonomika isotsiologiya=Regional Agrosystems: Economics and Sociology, 3, 91–99 (in Russian).
  • Zeng X., Yu Y., Yang S. et al. (2022). Urban resilience for urban sustainability: Concepts, dimensions, and perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(5), 2481. DOI: 10.3390/su14052481
  • Zhikharevich B.S., Klimanov V.V., Maracha V.G. (2020). Resilience of the territory: Concept, measurement, governance. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 3, 4–15. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2020-3-1 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная