Современные подходы к хирургическому и малоинвазивному лечению пациентов с доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы

Автор: Зимичев Александр Анатольевич, Гусев Денис Олегович, Почивалов Алексей Сергеевич, Сумский Павел Владимирович, Тарасов Иван Валерьевич, Виноградов Дмитрий Сергеевич

Журнал: Вестник медицинского института "РЕАВИЗ": реабилитация, врач и здоровье @vestnik-reaviz

Рубрика: Клиническая медицина

Статья в выпуске: 4 (46), 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Аденома предстательной железы является одним из наиболее распространённых урологических заболеваний среди лиц мужского пола. Процент страдающих ДГПЖ возрастает прямо пропорционально возрасту пациентов. Несмотря на высокую изученность этиологии, патогенеза и проявлений данного заболевания, не всегда удаётся достигнуть нужного эффекта с использованием консервативной терапии. Учитывая немолодой возраст большинства пациентов, обращающихся с данной проблемой, наличие ряда сопутствующих заболеваний, при наличии технической возможности приоритет отдаётся наименее травматичным оперативным вмешательствам. В обзоре литературы работе анализируются существующие подходы к хирургическому и малоинвазивному лечению пациентов с доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы.

Еще

Доброкачественная гиперплазия предстательной железы, хирургическое лечение дгпж, малоинвазивное лечение дгпж, современное лечение аденомы предстательной железы

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143172370

IDR: 143172370

Список литературы Современные подходы к хирургическому и малоинвазивному лечению пациентов с доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы

АГ-Shukri S.H. i dr. Narusheniya mocheispuskaniya u bol'nyh s neudovletvoritel'nymi rezul'tatami hirurgicheskogo lecheniya dobrokachestvennoj giperplazii predstatel'noj zhelezy // Vestnik hirurgii imeni l.l. Grekova. - 2017. - T. 176. - № 6.
Bachurin G.V. i dr. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika chastoty oslozhnenij transuretral'noj rezekcii prostaty i otkrytoj chrespuzyrnoj adenomektomii u bol'nyh s dobrokachestvennoj giperplaziej predstatel'noj zhelezy // Porivnyal'na harakteristika chastoti uskladnen' transuretral'noï rezekciï prostati i vidkritoï cherezmihurovoï adenomektomiï u hvorih na dobroyakisnu giperplaziyu peredmihurovoïzalozi. - 2013.
Tkachuk I.N. Oslozhneniya transuretral'noj rezekcii prostaty u bol'nyh dobrokachestvennoj giperplaziej predstatel'noj zhelezy i puti ih profilaktiki - M., 2011. - 152 s.
Estebesov N.S. Sravnitel'nyj analiz oslozhnenij transuretral'noj rezekcii prostaty i otkrytoj chrespuzyrnoj adenomektomii u bol'nyh s dobrokachestvennoj giperplaziej predstatel'noj zhelezy // Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossijskogo Slavyanskogo Universiteta. - 2014. - T. 14. - № 12. - S. 133-136.
Ahyai S.A. et al. Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Enlargement // European Urology. - 2010. -T. 58. - № 3. - C. 384-397.
Borboroglu Prodromos G. et al. Immediate and postoperative complications of transurethral prostatectomy in the 1990s // Journal of Urology. - 1999. - T. 162. - № 4. - C. 1307-1310.
He L. и др. The effect of immediate surgical bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate on prostatic hyperplasia with acute urinary retention. [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: https://www.pubfacts.com/detail/261783987The-effect-of-immediate-surgical-bipolar-plasmakinetic-transurethral-resection-of-the-prostate-on-pr (дата обращения: 15.07.2019).
Kenny A.G. et al. Brief observation: Prostate artery embolization in patients with acute urinary retention // The American Journal of Medicine. - 2019.
Reich O., Gratzke C., Stief C.G. Techniques and Long-Term Results of Surgical Procedures for BPH // European Urology. - 2006. - T. 49. - № 6. - C. 970-978.
Deng Z, Sun M, Zhu Y et al. Thulium laser Vapo-Resection of the prostate versus traditional transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis // World J Urol. - 2018. - № 36 (9). - P. 1355-1364.
Huang S.W., Tsai C.Y., Tseng C.S. et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis // BMJ. - 2019. - № 367. - P. 15919.
Inzunza G, Rada G, Majerson A. Bipolar or monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia? // Medwave. - 2018. - № 18 (1). - P. e7134.
Izard J., Nickel J.C. Impact of medical therapy on transurethral resection of the prostate: two decades of change // BJU Inf. - 2011. - № 108. - P. 89-93.
Jiang Y.L., Qian L.J. Transurethral resection of the prostate versus prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis // BMC Urol. - 2019. - № 19 (1 ). - P. 11.
Lourenco T, Shaw M, Fraser C et al. The clinical effectiveness of transurethral incision of the prostate: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials // World J Urol. - 2010. - № 28 (1). - P. 23-32.
Madersbacher S., Lackner J., Brössner C.; Prostate Study Group of the Austrian Society of Urology. Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases // Eur Urol. - 2005. - № 47 (4). - P. 499-504.
Mailing B., R0der M.A., Brasso K. et al. Prostate artery embolisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur Radiol. - 2019. - № 29(1). - P. 287-298.
Mayer E.K., Kroeze S.G., Chopra S. et al. Examining the 'gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes // BJU Int. -2012. -№ 110(11). - P. 1595-1601.
Glybochko P.V., Alyaev Yu.G., Lokshin K.L., Dymov A.M. Gol'mievaya enukleaciya prostaty v lechenii bol'nyh dobrokachestvennoj giperpdaziej predstatel'noj zhelezy // Medicinskij vestnik Bashkortostana. - 2011. -T. 6. - № 2. -S. 221-224.
Klinicheskie rekomendacii Evropejskoj associacii urologov, 2019. - M., 2019.
Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Grin1 E.A. i soavt. Sostoyanie kopulyativnoj funkcii u bol'nyh posle gol'mievoj lazernoj enukleacii dobrokachestvennoj giperplazii predstatel'noj zhelezy // Urologicheskie vedomosti. - 2019. - T. 9. -№ 2. - S. 17-22.
Ahyai S.A., Lehrich K., Kuntz R.M. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. // Eur Urol. - 2007. - № 52. - P. 1456-1463.
AI Rawashdah S.F., Pastore A.L., Velotti G. et al. Sexual and functional outcomes of prostate artery embolisation: A prospective long-term follow-up, large cohort study // Int J Clin Pract. - 2019, Nov. - № 26. - P.e13454.
DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13454
Autorino R. et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis // Eur Urol. - 2015. - № 68. - P. 86.
Bouza C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Transurethral Needle Ablation in symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia // BMC Urol. - 2006. - № 6. - P. 14.
Bushman W. Etiology, epidemiology, and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. // Urol Clin North Am. - 2009. - № 36. - P. 403-415.
Cui D. et al. A randomized trial comparing thulium laser resection to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: four-year follow-up results. // World J Urol. - 2014. -№ 32. - P. 683.
Donat R., Mancey-Jones B. Incidence of thromboembolism after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-a study on TED stocking prophylaxis and literature review. Scand J Urol Nephrol. - 2002. - № 36 (2). - P.119-123.
Emberton M., Cornel E., Bassi P., Fourcade O., Go'mez M., Castro R. Benign prostatic hyperplasia as a progressive disease: a guide to the risk factors and options for medical management // Int J Clin Pract. -2008. - № 62. - P. 076-1086.
Enikeev D. et al. Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Enucleation of Prostate: A Retrospective Comparison with Open Simple Prostatectomy // J Endourol. - 2018, Nov. - № 29. doi: 10.1089
Enikeev D., Taratkin M., Laukhtina E. et al. En bloc and two-lobe techniques for laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: retrospective comparative analysis of peri- and postoperative outcomes // Int Urol Nephrol. - 2019, Nov. - № 51 (11). - P. 1969-1974, Epub 2019 Aug 20.
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02259-2
Geavlete B. et al. Bipolar vaporization, resection, and enucleation versus open prostatectomy: optimal treatment alternatives in large prostate cases? // J Endourol. - 2015. - № 29. - P. 323.
Ghobrial F.K., Shoma A., Elshal A.M. et al. A randomized trial comparing bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight laser (xps-180watt) photoselective vaporization of the prostate for treatment of small to moderate benign prostatic obstruction: outcomes after 2 years // BJU Int. - 2019, Oct. - № 16.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14926
Gratzke C. et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. // J Urol. - 2007. - № 177. -P.1419.
Hoffman R.M. et al. Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. - 2012. - № 9. - Cd004135.
Kuntz R.M. et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial // Eur Urol. - 2008. - № 53. - P. 160.
Lim Ng K., Barber N. Prostatic hydroablation (Aquablation): A new effective ultrasound guided robotic waterjet ablative surgery for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia // Arch Esp Urol. - 2019, Oct. - № 72 (8). -P. 786-793.
Lucca I. et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis // World J Urol. - 2015. - № 33. - P. 563.
NICE. (2010) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men & Appendices A-H: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12984/48554/48554.pdf.
Omar M.l. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of bipolar compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) // BJU Int. - 2014. - № 113- P. 24.
Pokorny M. et al. Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Enlargement: Surgical Technique and Outcomes in a High-volume Robotic Centre // Eur Urol. - 2015. - № 68. - P. 451.
Robert G. et al. Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) // BJU Int. - 2016. - № 117. - P. 495.
Skolarikos A. et al. Eighteen-month results of a randomized prospective study comparing transurethral photoselective vaporization with transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas greater than 80 cc // J Endourol. - 2008. - № 22. - P. 2333.
Sotelo R. et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy // J Urol. - 2008. - № 179. - P. 513.
Sun I., Yoo S., Park J. et al. Quality of life after photo-selective vaporization and holmium-laser enucleation of the prostate: 5-year outcomes. // Sei Rep. - 2019, Jun 4. - № 9 (1). P. 8261.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44686-2
Tanaka E.Y., Barbosa F.T., Murta C.B., Claro J.F., Manzano J.P. Diode Laser Vaporization for Benign Prostate Plyperplasia: Outcome After 126 Procedures // J Endourol. - 2019, Dec. - № 33 (12). - P. 1025-1031.
DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0311
Vanderbrink, B.A., et al. Prostatic stents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia // Curr Opin Urol. -2007. - № 17. - P. 1.
Zhou Y. et al. Greenlight high-performance system (HPS) 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized controlled trials // Lasers Med Sci. - 2016. - № 31. - P. 485.

Еще

Статья научная