Specifics of reproductive behavior of female residents of Moscow

Автор: Arkhangelskii V.N., Bogdan I.V., Kalachikova O.N., Chistyakova D.P.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Birth rate dynamics in Russia’s population remains one of the major objects of attention of demographic science and politics. In 2019, the aggregate birth rate in Moscow exceeded the Russian average, giving rise to assumptions about the likelihood of the emergence of a new trend, despite the fact that studies of reproductive behavior of city dwellers indicate the prevalence of intentions to have fewer children. The article presents estimates of birth rates in metropolitan megacities of Russia, indicating that the values of indicators are still lower than the Russian average and even lower than the same indicators for Russia’s urban population. According to the data of an up-to-date survey of female Moscow residents, we find the prevalence of intentions to have fewer children and postpone childbirth. Significant factors influencing the intentions of female Moscow residents to have children are marital behavior, level of education, standard of living and value orientations. Birth rates in female Moscow residents with higher education in real generations are slightly lower than the Russian average. A slightly less pronounced inclination toward getting married in a civil ceremony also has a significant determinant role. The impact of income level cannot be assessed unambiguously. Indeed, in groups of women with relatively lower welfare, fertility rates are higher, but this is due to the ratio of satisfaction with the standard of living and the importance of children (the need for children). A higher level of income (and satisfaction with it) contributes to the realization of reproductive intentions. Female Moscow residents tend to have fewer children since such an attitude is passed down from previous generations; besides, among them, there is a higher proportion of those focused on individual values, which also determines a lower birth rate in a metropolitan megacity. Taking into account birth rate trends and the peculiarities of reproductive behavior of female Moscow residents can contribute to improving the effectiveness of demographic policy.

Еще

Women's reproductive behavior, reproductive behavior of female moscow residents, drivers of women's reproductive behavior

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241605

IDR: 147241605   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.3.87.12

Список литературы Specifics of reproductive behavior of female residents of Moscow

  • Antonov A.I., Medkov V.M., Arkhangel’skii V.N. (2002). Demograficheskie protsessy v Rossii XXI veka [Demographic Processes in Russia in the 21st Century].
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N., Elizarov V.V., Dzhanaeva N.G. (2021). Children or material support: The determination of choice. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population of the Regions of Russia, 17(1), 102–120. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.1.8 (in Russian).
  • Arkhangelsky V.N., Zinkina Yu.V., Shulgin S.G. (2019). Fertility differentiation according to female education levels in Russia: Current situation and forecast scenarios. Narodonaselenie=Population, 22(1), 21–39 (in Russian).
  • Beginina I.A., Kalugina T.A. (2018). The peculiarities of rural women’s reproductive goals. Izv. Sarat. un-ta. Nov. ser. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya=Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 4, 413–418 (in Russian).
  • Belova V., Darskii L. (1968). Women’s views on family formation (according to a special survey of employees of several Moscow enterprises). Vestnik statistiki, 8, 27–36 (in Russian).
  • Blinova T.V., Vyalshina A.A. (2012). Reproductive preferences of women in rural areas and value of children in the family. Promyshlennost’: ekonomika, upravlenie, tekhnologii, 4(43), 165–170 (in Russian).
  • Borisov V.A. (1976). Perspektivy rozhdaemosti [Prospects for Fertility]. Moscow: Statistika.
  • Denisov A.Yu. (2015). Specificity and significance of reproductive behavior of Belarusian urban population. Sotsiologicheskii al’manakh, 6, 165–171 (in Russian).
  • Frejka T., Sardon J.P. (2005). First birth trends in developed countries: Persisting parenthood postponement. Demographic Research, 6(15), 147–180.
  • Gustafsson S. (2005). Having kids later. Economic analyses for industrialized countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 5–16.
  • Gustafsson S., Worku S. (2005). Assortative Mating by education and postponement of couple formation and first birth in Britain and Sweden. Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 91–113.
  • Lappegård T., Rønsen M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population, 21, 31–49.
  • Marini M.M. (1984). Women’s educational attainment and the timing of entry into parenthood. American Sociological Review, 49, 491–511.
  • Medkov V.M. (1983). Living standards and reproductive behavior of an urban two-child family. In: Sotsial’no-demograficheskie issledovaniya braka, sem’i, rozhdaemosti i reproduktivnykh ustanovok [Socio-Demographic Studies of Marriage, Family, Fertility, and Reproductive Attitudes]. Erevan (in Russian).
  • Novoselova E.N. (2014). The traditional family in the big city: Social atavism and essential value. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 4, 138–165 (in Russian).
  • Rusanova N. E. Ozhiganova A.A. (2022). Reproductive strategies of Russian women: Results of the pilot survey. Narodonaselenie=Population, 25(4), 55–67. DOI: 10.19181/population.2022.25.4.5 (in Russian).
  • Shabunova. A.A. (2010). Zdorov’e naseleniya v Rossii: sostoyanie i dinamika: monografiya [Population Health in Russia: State and Dynamics: Monograph]. Vologda: ISERT RAN.
  • Sifman R.I. (1976). Fertility and wealth. In: Rozhdaemost’ [Fertility] (in Russian).
  • Sinel’nikov A.B. (2015). The impact of marriage on fertility and population policy in Russia. Sem’ya i sotsial’no-demograficheskie issledovaniya. Nauchnyi internet-zhurnal, 4, 1–17 (in Russian).
  • Sinel’nikov A.B. (2019). Transformation of marriage and fertility in Russia. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2, 26–39 (in Russian).
  • Sivoplyasova S.Yu., Sigareva E.P., Arkhangel’skii V.N. (2022). Living of standards and fertility: The relationship of two inequalities at the macro and micro levels. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo=Economics, Taxes & Law, 15(3), 38–51. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-3-38-51 (in Russian).
  • Sobotka T. (2004). Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe. Groningen and Amsterdam: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen and Dutch University Press.
  • Stepanova A.V. (2014). Demographic development of Moscow in the early 2000 years. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 4, 103–112. DOI: 10.12737/7406 (in Russian).
  • Zhuk E.I. (2016). Reproductive settings of young and middle-aged Muscovites. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 156–174. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.1.06 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная