Comparative results of performing low anterior rectal resection without the formation of a preventive stoma and with the formation of a preventive transverse ostomy and/or ileostomy in a routine ward: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Автор: Smirnov A.A., Chernikovsky I.L., Khrykov G.N., Sheremetev D.Yu., Ayupov R.T., Feoktistov D.V., Goncharov A.L., Chir-Chir E.M., Burlov N.N., Goncharova V.S.
Журнал: Московский хирургический журнал @mossj
Рубрика: Литературные обзоры
Статья в выпуске: 1 (95), 2026 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Introduction. Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection (LAR) is a life-threatening complication. Preventive stoma formation is the primary method of prevention, but is associated with decreased quality of life and the need for reoperation. Objective: To compare the outcomes of LAR with total mesorectumectomy (TME) with and without a preventive stoma in patients with a low initial risk of leakage. Materials and methods. This multicenter RCT included patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic LAR with TME at a low risk of leakage. The study group consisted of patients without stoma formation, while the control group consisted of patients with similar characteristics but with a preventive ileostomy or transverse ileostomy. Discussion. The advisability of a stoma in low-risk patients remains unresolved. A protocol for a multicenter RCT, the RELOAD-trial, was developed to investigate this issue. Conclusion. The results will show the incidence of leaks, immediate outcomes, quality of life, and the incidence of ileostomy syndrome in the compared groups.
Rectal cancer, total mesorectumectomy, preventive stoma, randomized trial
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142247262
IDR: 142247262 | УДК: 616.351-031-089.87.008 | DOI: 10.17238/2072-3180-2026-1-235-245