Comparative analysis of the immediate and long-term results of open surgical interventions with extended occlusion of the superficial femoral artery
Автор: Zhdanovich K.V., Puzdryak P.D., Gusinskiy A.V., Shlomin V.V., Kucherenko V.S., Fionik O.V., Danilova D.A., Arutyunyan S.O.
Журнал: Вестник Национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н.И. Пирогова @vestnik-pirogov-center
Рубрика: Оригинальные статьи
Статья в выпуске: 1, 2025 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Rationale: The research topic reflects the issues of steno-occlusive lesion of the femoral-popliteal segment and methods of surgical treatment.Methods: The results of open operations on the femoral-popliteal segment in 141 patients were analyzed. Three study groups were formed: №1 (n = 53) - after remote endarterectomy (RE), №2 (n = 47) - after vein bypass (VBP), № 3 (n = 41) - after polytetrafluorethylene bypass (PTFE). The period of retrospective analysis corresponded to 3, 5 and 10 years of follow-up.Results: After 3 years, the PP in RE and VBP was 78.4% and 80%, respectively, significantly lower in PTFE - 60,5% (p = 0,085). SP was 86,3%, 88,9%, and 76,3%, respectively. Freedom from reintervation is higher in RE - 54,5%, in bypass surgery groups 33,3% and 30,8%, respectively. The percentage of limb preservation was 94,1% vs 95,5% in the RE and VBP groups, 81,6% in PTFE (p = 0,02). The overall survival rate was 96,2%, 95,7% and 92,7%, respectively. After 5 years, the PP is 43,8% vs 46,3% vs 30,5%. SP is higher in the VBP group - 70,7%, compared with PTFE and RE - 58,3% and 66,6%, respectively. Freedom from reinterpretation is 44,4% vs 27,2% vs 28%, respectively. Limb preservation rates remained high in the RE and VBP groups - 87,5% vs 85%, in the PTFE group - 72,22% (p = 0,075). The survival rate was 90,56%, 87,23% and 87,8%, respectively. By the age of 10, there were no primary passable synthetic shunts. The PP of RE and VBP decreased to 22,2% and 26,3%, respectively (p = 0,006). SP is 53,3% vs 57,9% vs 41,2%, respectively. The frequency of limb preservation is 82,2% vs 76,3% vs 61,8%, respectively (p = 0,058). RE has the highest freedom from reintervation (p = 0,091). The survival rate was 84,9%, 80,8% and 82,9%, respectively.Conclusion: The advantages of the remote endarterectomy have been revealed in comparison with bypass surgery, slightly inferior to vein bypass in primary patency, which confirms the importance of the method in arterial surgery and opens up new opportunities for reintervations.
Femoral-popliteal segment, bypass surgery, remote endarterectomy, vein, polytetrafluorethylene
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140309974
IDR: 140309974 | DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2025_20_1_36