State Of The Art: A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare

Автор: Iroju Olaronke, Ojerinde Oluwaseun, Ikono Rhoda

Журнал: International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business(IJIEEB) @ijieeb

Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.9, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In general, the applications of robots have shifted rapidly from industrial uses to social uses. This provides robots with the ability to naturally interact with human beings and socially fit into the human environment. The deployment of social robots in the healthcare system is becoming extensive as a result of the shortage of healthcare professionals, rising costs of healthcare and the exponential growth in the number of vulnerable populations such as the sick, the aged and children with developmental disabilities. Consequently, social robots are used in healthcare for providing health education and entertainment for patients in the hospital and for providing aids for the sick and aged. They are also used for dispensing drugs and providing rehabilitation as well as emotional and aging care. Hence, social robots improve the efficiency and quality of healthcare services. The interaction between social robots and human beings is known as human-robot interaction. Human-robot interaction in healthcare is faced with numerous challenges such as the fear of displacement of caregivers by robots, safety, usefulness, acceptability as well as appropriateness. These challenges ultimately lead to a low rate of acceptance of the robotic technology. Consequently, this paper extensively appraises human-robot interaction in healthcare, their applications and challenges. Design, ethical and usability issues such as privacy, trust, safety, users' attitude, culture, robot morphology as well as emotions and deception arising from the interaction between humans and robots in healthcare are also reviewed in this paper.

Еще

Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Human-robot interaction, Robots, Social Robots

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15013510

IDR: 15013510

Список литературы State Of The Art: A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare

  • K. Wada, and T. Shibata, "Living with seal robots in a care house devaluations of social and physiological influences," IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, October 2006.
  • P. S. Lum, C. G. Burgar, P. C. Shor, M. Majmundar, and M. Van der Loos, "Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 83, pp. 952-959, 2002.
  • H.Robinson, A.M. Bruce, N. Kerse, E. Broadbent, "Suitability of healthcare robots for a dementia unit and suggested improvements," JAMDA, Elsevier, pp.1-7. 2012.
  • M.M.A. de Graaf, S. B. Allouch, and J.A.G.M. van Dijk, "What makes robots social?: A user's perspective on characteristics for social human-robot interaction", Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015
  • A.Weiss, and V. Evers, "Exploring cultural factors in Human-Robot Interaction: A matter of personality?," Comparative Informatics Workshop, December, 2011.
  • D. Feil-seifer, and M.J. Mataric, "Ethical principles for socially assistive robotics". Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 18, 2011.
  • K. S. Bankston, and A. Stepanovich,"When robot eyes are watching you: the law & policy of automated communications surveillance", We Robot, University of Miami, 2014.
  • M.Matarić, A.Tapus, C. Winstein,and J. Eriksson, "Socially assistive robotics for stroke and mild TBI rehabilitation", Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation, vol. 145,pp.249-262, 2008.
  • A. De Santis, B. Siciliano, A. De Luca, and A. Bicchi, "An atlas of physical human-robot interaction", Mechanism and Machine Theory, Science Direct, Elsevier, 2007.
  • K. Capek, "Rossum's universal robots,"Dover Publications", 2001.
  • V. Kumar,"Introduction to Robotics," University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia", 2014.
  • Y. S. Choi, "A Study of Human-Robot Interaction with an assistive robot to help people with severe motor impairments", Unpublished PhD Thesis, H. Milton Stewart School Of Industrial And Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute Of Technology, 2009.
  • A. Davison, "Introduction to robotics," Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 2016.
  • F. Hegel, C. Muhl, B. Wrede, M. Hielscher-Fastabend, G. Sagerer, "Understanding social robots, "Advances in Human Computer Interaction, 2009.
  • M. O. Qureshi, and R.S. Syed, "The impact of robotics on employment and motivation of employees in the service sector, with special reference to health care," Safety and Health at Work, vol. 5, pp. 198-202, 2014.
  • S.Kiesler, and P. Hinds,"Introduction to this special issue on Human-Robot Interaction,"Special Issue of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, 2004.
  • B. Keefe, "Robots/robotics in healthcare", Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation, 2015.
  • A. Bruce, I. Nourbakhsh, R. Simmons, "The role of expres¬siveness and attention in human robot interaction", Fall Symposium on Emotional and Intelligence. II, The Tangled Knot of Social. Cog¬nition, 2001.
  • K. G. Engelhardt, R. A. Edwards, "Human robot integration for service robotics," in Human-Robot Interaction, Mansour Rahimi, Waldemar Karwowki. Eds. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd., 1992, pp. 315-346.
  • C. Bartneck, J. Forlizzi, "A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction," Proceedings of RO-MAN, Kurashiki. pp. 591-594, 2004.
  • C. Breazeal, Designing Sociable Robots, Cambridge: MA, MIT Press, 2002.
  • T. W. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, I, K. Dautenhahn, "A survey of socially interactive robots: Concepts, design, and applications," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, pp. 142-166, 2002.
  • J. Złotowski, D. Proudfoot, K. Yogeeswaran and C. Bartneck, "Anthropomorphism: opportunities and challenges in human–robot interaction," International Journal of Social Robots, vol. 7, pp. 347–360, 2015.
  • I. Asimov, "I, Robot," Doubleday, 1950.
  • J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, G. Lugano, and L.Fortunati, "Social robots from a human perspective," Springer, 2015.
  • M. A. Goodrich and A. C. Schultz, "Human–robot interaction: A survey," Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 1, pp. 203-275, 2007.
  • A. Weiss, R. Bernhaupt, M. Tscheligi, and E. Yoshida, "Addressing user experience and societal impact in a user study with a humanoid robot, Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 2009.
  • H.A Yanco, and J. Drury, "Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy," Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol.3, pp.2841-2846, 2004.
  • J.L. Drury, J. Scholtz, and H.A. Yanco, "Awareness in human-robot interactions," Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 111–119, 2003.
  • G. Randelli, "Improving human-robot awareness through semantic-driven tangible interaction," Unpublished PhD Thesis, Sapienza University of Rome, 2011.
  • R.A.Cohen, Health insurance coverage: Early release of estimates from the national health interview survey, National Health Interview Survey Program, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/insur201605.pdf, 2015.
  • M. Montemerlo, J. Pineau, N. Roy, S. Thrun, and V. Verma, "Experiences with a mobile robotic guide for the elderly," National Conference on Artificial Intelligence," 2002.
  • M. E. Pollack, L. Brown, D. Colbry, C. Orosz, B. Peintner, S. Ramkrishnan, S. Engberg, J. Matthews, J. Dunbar Jacob, C. McCarthy, S. Thrun, M. Montemerlo, J. Pineau, and N. Roy," Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly," AAAI Workshop on Automation as Caregiver, 2002.
  • Bestic. "Bestic," http://www.bestic.se/en/home/, 2013.
  • M. Topping, and J. Smith, "The development of Handy 1, a rehabilitation robotic system to assist the severely disabled," Industrial Robot, vol. 25, pp. 316-320, 1998.
  • J. J. Diehl, C. R. Crowell, M. Villano, K. Wier, K. Tang, and L. D Riek, "Clinical applications of robots in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and treatment," Comprehensive Guide to Autism, Springer, pp. 411-422, 2014.
  • L. D Riek, Robotics technology in mental health care,"in Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral Health and Mental Health Care, D. Luxton (Ed.), Elsevier, 2015.
  • C. D. Kidd, and C. Breazeal, "Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2008.
  • M. R. Banks, L. M. Willoughby, and W. A. Banks, "Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: Use of robotic versus living dogs,"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 9, pp. 173-177, 2008.
  • F. Itulua-Abumere, "Ethical issues in health and social care profession," OSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (JHSS), pp. 14-18 , 2012
  • T.L. Beauchamp, and J.F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • P.S Winkelstein, "Ethical and social challenges of electronic health information,"Medical Informatics, pp.139- 159, 2009.
  • O.G. Iroju and J.O. Olaleke," Ethical issues in interoperability of electronic healthcare systems," Communications on Applied Electronics, New York, USA, pp. 12-18, 2015.
  • M. Almacen, "EHR interoperability: legal, ethical, and social challenges," Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois, 2013.
  • M. Scheutz,"The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots," Human-Robot Interaction Laboratory Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University Bloomington, USA, 2015
  • R. Sparrow, and Sparrow, L., "In the hands of machines? The future of aged care," Minds Machines, vol. 16, pp. 141–161, 2006.
  • ISO 9241-11," Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - part 11," Guidance on usability, International Organization for Standardization, 1998
  • D. J. Mayhew, "The usability engineering lifecycle: A practitioner's handbook for user interface design," Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, California, 1999.
  • A. Dillon, 'User acceptance of information technology," in Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics, vol. 1. W. Karwowski, Taylor and Francis, Eds London, 2001.
  • A.Weiss, R. Bernhaupt, M. Lankes and M. Tscheligi, "The USUS evaluation framework for human-robot interaction," HCI and Usability Unit, ICT&S Center, University of Salzburg, Sigmund, Haffner-Gasse ,Salzburg, Austria, 2015.
  • V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies," Management Science, vol. 46, pp. 86–204, 2000.
  • C. May, L. Gask, T. Atkinson, N. Ellis, F. Mair, and A. Esmail, "Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: The case of telepsychiatry", Social Science and Medicine, vol. 52, pp.1889 1901, 2001.
  • M. Pino, M. Boulay, F. Jouen and A.S. Rigaud, "Are we ready for robots that care for us?" Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots," Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol.7, 2015.
  • L. D. Riek, N. Mavridis, S. Antali, N. Darmaki, Z. Ahmed and Al-Neyadi, M.. "Ibn Sina steps out: Exploring Arabic attitudes toward humanoid robots," Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 88-99, 2010.
  • R. W. Picard. "What does it mean for a computer to have emotions," Emotions in humans and artifacts, pp 87-102, 2003.
  • H. Cameron, "On the possibility of robots having emotions. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Depatment of Philosophy, Georgia State University, 2014.
Еще
Статья научная