Studying the relationship between climatic factors and cotton production by different applied methods

Автор: Sawan Zakaria M.

Журнал: Журнал стресс-физиологии и биохимии @jspb

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.9, 2013 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This study investigates the statistical relationship between climatic variables and aspects of cotton production ( G.barbadense ), and the effects of climatic factors prevailing prior to flowering or subsequent to boll setting on flower and boll production and retention in cotton. Also, the study covers the predicted effects of climatic factors during convenient intervals (in days) on cotton flower and boll production compared with daily observation. Further, cotton flower and boll production as affected by climatic factors and soil moisture status has been considered. Evaporation, sunshine duration, relative humidity, surface soil temperature at 1800 h, and maximum air temperature, are the important climatic factors that significantly affect flower and boll production. The least important variables were found to be surface soil temperature at 0600 h and minimum temperature. The five-day interval was found to be more adequately and sensibly related to yield parameters. Evaporation, minimum humidity and sunshine duration were the most effective climatic factors during preceding and succeeding periods on boll production and retention. There was a negative correlation between flower and boll production and either evaporation or sunshine duration, while that correlation with minimum relative humidity was positive. The soil moisture status showed low and insignificant correlation with flower and boll production. Higher minimum relative humidity, short period of sunshine duration, and low temperatures enhanced flower and boll formation.

Еще

Cotton flower and boll production, boll retention, evaporation, relative humidity, soil moisture status, sunshine duration, temperature

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14323807

IDR: 14323807

Список литературы Studying the relationship between climatic factors and cotton production by different applied methods

  • Barbour MM, Farquhar GD (2000) Relative humidity-and ABA-induced variation in carbon and oxygen isotope ratios of cotton leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 23: 473-485
  • Bhatt JG (1977) Growth and flowering of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by daylength and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science 89: 583-588
  • Cady FB, Allen DM (1972) Combining experiments to predict future yield data. Agron J 64: 211-214
  • Draper NR, Smith H (1966) Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, NY. 407 pp
  • El-Zik KM (1980) The cotton plant -its growth and development. Western Cotton Prod. Conf. Summary Proc., Fresno, CA, p. 18-21
  • Fisher WD (1975) Heat induced sterility in Upland cotton. Proc 27th Cotton Improvement Conf. 85
  • Guinn G (1982) Causes of square and boll shedding in cotton. USDA Tech. Bull. 1672. USDA, Washington, DC
  • Gutiérrez Mas JC, López M (2003) Heat, limitation of yields of cotton in Andalucia. Agricultura, Revista Agropecuaria 72: 690-692
  • Hearn AB, Constable GA (1984) The Physiology of Tropical Food Crops. Chapter 14: Cotton. P. 495-527 (Edited by Goldsworth, P.R.; Fisher, N.M.), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., NY. 664 pp
  • Holaday AS, Haigler CH, Srinivas NG, Martin LK, Taylor JG (1997) Alterations of leaf photosynthesis and fiber cellulose synthesis by cool night temperatures. In Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 6-10, New Orleans, LA, National Cotton Council, TN pp 1435-1436
  • Human JJ, Du Toit D, Bezuidenhout HD, De Bruyn LP (1990) The influence of plant water stress on net photosynthesis and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J Agron Crop Sci 164: 231-241
  • Kaur R, Singh OS (1992) Response of growth stages of cotton varieties to moisture stress. Indian J Plant Physiol 35: 182-185
  • Meek CR, Oosterhuis DM, Steger AT (1999) Drought tolerance and foliar sprays of glycine betaine. In Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 3-7, Orlando, FL, USA. Memphis, USA. National Cotton Council, 559-561
  • Mergeai G, Demol J (1991) Contribution to the study of the effect of various meteorological factors on production and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibers. Bulletin des Recherches Agronomiqued de Gembloux 26: 113-124
  • Miller JK, Krieg DR, Paterson RE (1996) Relationship between dryland cotton yields and weather parameters on the Southern Hig Plains. In Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 9-12, Nashville, TN, USA, Memphis, USA, National Cotton Council, 1165-1166
  • Oosterhuis DM (1997) Effect of temperature extremes on cotton yields in Arkansas. In Proceedings of the Cotton Research Meeting, held at Monticello, Arkansas, USA, February 13 [Edited by Oosterhuis, D.M.; Stewart, J.M.]. Special Report-Agricultural Experiment Station, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, No. 183: 94-98
  • Orgaz F, Mateos L, Fereres E (1992) Season length and cultivar determine the optimum evapotranspiration deficit in cotton. Agron J 84: 700-706
  • Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM (1995) Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on pima cotton growth. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 54: 17-29
  • Reddy KR, Robana RR, Hodges HF, Liu XJ, Mckinion JM (1998) Interactions of CO2 enrichment and temperature on cotton growth and leaf characteristics. Environ Exp Bot 39: 117-129
  • SAS Institute, Inc (1985) SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. pp. 433-506
  • Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL (2005) Response of flower and boll development to climatic factors before and after anthesis in Egyptian cotton. Climate Research 29: 167-179
  • Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL (2006) Appropriate time scale for aggregating climatic data to predict flowering and boll setting behaviour of cotton in Egypt. Communication in Biometry and Crop Science 1: 11-19
  • Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL, Foote RJ (2010) Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense) flower and boll production as affected by climatic factors and soil moisture status. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 99: 217-227
  • Schrader SM, Wise RR, Wacholtz WF, Ort DR, Sharkey TD (2004) Thylakoid membrane responses to moderately high leaf temperature in Pima Cotton. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 725-735
  • Ward DA, Bunce JA (1986) Responses of net photosynthesis and conductance to independent changes in the humidity environments of the upper and lower surfaces of leaves of sunflower and soybean. J Exper Botany 37: 1842-1853
  • Wise RR, Olson AJ, Schrader SM, Sharkey TD (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 717-724
  • Xiao J-F, Liu Z-G, Yu X-G, Zhang J-Y, Duan A-W (2000) Effects of different water application on lint yield and fiber quality of cotton under drip irrigation. Acta Gossypii Sinica 12: 194-197
  • Zhao D-L, Oosterhuis D (1997) Physiological response of growth chamber-grown cotton plants to the plant growth regulator PGR-IV under water-deficit stress. Environ Exper Botany 38: 7-14
  • Zhou Z-G, Meng Y-L, Shi Pei, Shen Y-Q, Jia Z-K (2000) Study of the relationship between boll weight in wheat-cotton double cropping and meteorological factors at boll-forming stage. Acta Gossypii Sinica 12: 122-126
Еще
Статья научная