The age factor in the digital divide: the edges of inequality

Автор: Gruzdeva Mariya A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

At the end of the 1990s - beginning of the 2000s, due to the spread of the Internet at an increasing rate in certain countries, while others were lagging behind, it became necessary to study the digital gap issues. At the present stage, when the existence of the digital divide in the world and individual states is obvious and proven, researchers have focused on studying its factors. The article aims to assess the influence of the age factor on the scale and prevalence of the digital divide within a three-level model. To do this, we consider theoretical and methodological approaches to studying the age factor of the digital divide; we analyze trends in the use of information and communication technologies by representatives of various age groups, and the inclusion of children, adolescents and the elderly in the digital environment. The model of three levels of the digital divide developed by modern scientists is used as a theoretical basis. According to the model, inequality manifests itself in access to technical means, differences in the digital literacy, and the benefits derived from digitalization. In the course of the work, we use a set of general scientific methods. We reveal significant differences in the practices of using personal computers and the Internet among representatives of different age groups and calculate the time periods necessary to reduce intergenerational gaps in Russia and the Vologda Oblast. We assess the impact of online habits on a person’s life, the purposes of using the Internet and the possibility of receiving bonuses from it, the availability of digital skills for various age groups of Vologda Oblast population. The scientific novelty of the study consists in assessing the influence of the age factor on the prevalence of digital gap parameters at the regional level. The results can be used for identifying the groups that are at risk of being excluded from the processes of digital development. The findings will be also useful in formulating the relevance of social retraining programs for the able-bodied population in accordance with the requirements of new jobs, in teaching older people digital skills, and in making managerial decisions for successful digital development.

Еще

Information and communication technologies, digital divide, age factor, youth, elderly people, older people, middle-aged people, digital skills, internet

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238479

IDR: 147238479   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.14

Список литературы The age factor in the digital divide: the edges of inequality

  • Anderson M., Perrin A. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults: Technology use among seniors. Available at: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/14/2017/05/16170850/PI_2017.05.17_OlderAmericans-Tech_FINAL.pdf
  • Arkhipova M.Yu., Sirotin V.P., Sukhareva N.A. (2018). Development of a composite indicator for measuring the value and dynamics of digital divide in Russia. Voprosy statistiki, 25(4), 75–87 (in Russian).
  • Berner J., Rennemark M., Jogréus C., Berglund J. (2012). Distribution of personality, individual characteristics and internet usage in Swedish older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 16, 119–126. DOI:10.1080/13607863.2011.602958
  • Bikkulov A.S., Sergeeva O.V. (2016). Personal computer as everyday technology: Empirical research of computer usage among Russian elderly. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki=Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2(42), 95–103 (in Russian).
  • Charness N., Boot W.R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258.
  • Chassiakos Y.J., Radesky D., Christakis M. et al. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2593
  • Darinskaya L.A., Moskvicheva N.L. (2017). Opportunities of intergenerational interaction when involving the elderly people in the digital environment. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal=Saint Petersburg Psychological Journal, 20, 43–65 (in Russian).
  • Dmitrieva A.V. (2018). Achieving the social inclusion of elderly people: A continuation of employment or ‘advanced’ leisure? Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki=The of Social Policy Studies, 1, 37–50 (in Russian).
  • Dobrinskaya D.E., Martynenko T.S. (2019). Perspectives of the Russian information society: Digital divide levels. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 108–120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-108-120 (in Russian).
  • Donelle L., Facca D., Burke Sh., Hiebert B., Bender E., Ling S. (2021). Exploring Canadian children’s social media use, digital literacy, and quality of life: Pilot cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Formative Research, 5. DOI: 10.2196/18771
  • Ershova R.V. (2019). Digital generation: Between myth and reality. Filosofskie nauki=Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 62(2), 96–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-2-96-108 (in Russian).
  • Gladkova A.A., Garifullin V.Z., Ragnedda M. (2019). Model of three levels of the digital divide: Current advantages and limitations (exemplified by the Republic of Tatarstan). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 4, 41–72. DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.4172 (in Russian).
  • Gorelova T.P., Serebrovskaya T.B. (2021). Generation N: The formation of new digital consumers. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya=International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 6, 263–278 (in Russian).
  • Gruzdeva M.A. (2020). Inclusion of population in digital space: Global trends and inequality of Russian regions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(5), 90–104. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.5 (in Russian).
  • Khvatov A.E., Vatoropin A.S. (2017). Factors preventing the public from receiving public services in electronic form. Voprosy upravleniya=Management Issues, 3, 53–61 (in Russian).
  • Kuchmaeva O.V., Arkhipova Yu.M. (2021). Digital technologies in everyday life of the Russians. Voprosy statistiki, 3, 45–55 (in Russian).
  • Lelkes O. (2013). Happier and less isolated: Internet use in old age. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(1), 33–46.
  • Mitzner T., Savla J., Boot W., Sharit J., Charness N., Czaja S., Rogers W. (2019). Technology adoption by older adults: Findings from the PRISM trial. Gerontologist, 59(1), 34–44. DOI:10.1093/geront/gny113
  • Nieminen H. (2016). Digital divide and beyond: What do we know of information and communications technology’s long-term social effects? Some uncomfortable questions. European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115614198
  • Ragnedda M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 2366–2375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006
  • Ragnedda M., Kreitem H. (2018). The three levels of digital divide in East EU countries. World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 4, 5–27. DOI: 10.30547/worldofmedia.4.2018.1
  • Robinson L., Cotten S.R., Ono H. et al. (2015) Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
  • Safiullin A.R., Moiseeva O.A. (2019). Digital inequality: Russia and other countries in the fourth industrial revolution. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskie nauki=St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 12(6), 26–37. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12602 (in Russian).
  • Senokosova O.V. (2018). Problems of labor use and training of the population aged 60 and older. Professional’naya orientatsiya=Professional Orientation, 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-ispolzovaniya-truda-i-podgotovki-naseleniya-v-vozraste-60 (in Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Korolenko A.V. (2019). Children’s involvement in digital space: Gadgetization trends and threats to human development. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya=Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations, 3(4), 430–442 (in Russian).
  • Shakirova G.F. (2017). Interrelations between the psychological climate, social status of families and interpersonal relations of preschool children using digital technologies. Filologiya i kul’tura=Philology and Culture, 4(50), 249–252 (in Russian).
  • Shakirova G.F. (2020). Psychological features of students’ gadget addiction. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal=Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 1(138), 217–223 (in Russian).
  • Shinyaeva O.V., Poletaeva O.V., Slepova O.M. (2019). Information and digital inequality: Searching for effective population adaptation practices. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 68–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.04 (in Russian).
  • Shinyaeva O.V., Slepova O.M. (2019). Information digital divide of population: Risk and anti-risk factors. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya=Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 19(1), 53–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2019-19-1-53-61 (in Russian).
  • Smirnykh L.I. (2020). Digital literacy of the elderly population and digitalization of enterprises: Experience of European countries. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 104–124 (in Russian).
  • Solomatina V.A. (2020). Digital literacy of young learners. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-gumanitarnogo universiteta=Bulletin of the State University of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(37), 71–74 (in Russian).
  • Varlamova Yu.A. (2022). The intergenerational digital divide in Russia. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 31(2), 51–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-2-51-74 (in Russian).
  • Volchenko O.V. (2016). Dynamics of the digital divide in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 5, 163–182. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.5.10 (in Russian).
  • Yates S., Kirby J., Lockley E. (2015). Digital media use: Differences and inequalities in relation to class and age. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 1–21. DOI: 10.5153/sro.3751
  • Zarubina Yu.N., Vlasova A.A. (2018). Gender inequality in digital society. Vestnik sotsial’no-politicheskikh nauk=Vestnik Social’no-Politicheskikh Nauk, 17, 16–20 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная